Toward Optimal LLM Alignments Using Two-Player Games
2406.10977
0
0
Abstract
The standard Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) framework primarily focuses on optimizing the performance of large language models using pre-collected prompts. However, collecting prompts that provide comprehensive coverage is both tedious and challenging, and often fails to include scenarios that LLMs need to improve on the most. In this paper, we investigate alignment through the lens of two-agent games, involving iterative interactions between an adversarial and a defensive agent. The adversarial agent's task at each step is to generate prompts that expose the weakness of the defensive agent. In return, the defensive agent seeks to improve its responses to these newly identified prompts it struggled with, based on feedback from the reward model. We theoretically demonstrate that this iterative reinforcement learning optimization converges to a Nash Equilibrium for the game induced by the agents. Experimental results in safety scenarios demonstrate that learning in such a competitive environment not only fully trains agents but also leads to policies with enhanced generalization capabilities for both adversarial and defensive agents.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel game-theoretical approach called "Game-theoretical Preference Optimization (GPO)" for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences.
- The key idea is to cast the alignment problem as a two-player game between the LLM and a "preference optimizer" agent, where the goal is to find an optimal strategy for the LLM to satisfy the preferences of the optimizer.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of GPO through experiments on language generation and reinforcement learning tasks, and show that it can outperform existing preference alignment methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to make large language models (LLMs) behave more in line with human preferences. The core idea is to treat the alignment problem as a game between the LLM and a "preference optimizer" agent. The goal is to find the best strategy for the LLM to satisfy the preferences of the optimizer.
Imagine you have a very capable AI assistant that can help with all sorts of tasks. However, you want to make sure the assistant's behavior aligns with your values and preferences - for example, you don't want it to say inappropriate things or make decisions that go against your moral principles. The proposed Game-theoretical Preference Optimization (GPO) approach is a way to achieve this alignment.
The key insight is to set up the problem as a game between the LLM and a preference optimizer agent. The optimizer's job is to try to identify the LLM's weaknesses and push it towards more desirable behavior. Meanwhile, the LLM tries to learn how to satisfy the optimizer's preferences as best it can. Through this back-and-forth interaction, the LLM can become better aligned with human values.
The authors show that this GPO approach outperforms existing methods for aligning LLMs, both in language generation tasks and reinforcement learning scenarios. By casting the alignment problem as a game, the LLM can learn more robust and effective strategies for behaving in accordance with human preferences.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a Game-theoretical Preference Optimization (GPO) framework for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. The key idea is to formulate the alignment problem as a two-player game between the LLM and a "preference optimizer" agent.
In this game, the preference optimizer aims to identify the weaknesses of the LLM and push it towards more desirable behavior that aligns with human values and preferences. The LLM, on the other hand, tries to learn how to satisfy the optimizer's preferences as effectively as possible.
Through this adversarial interaction, the LLM can develop robust strategies for behaving in accordance with human preferences. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of GPO through experiments on language generation and reinforcement learning tasks, showing that it can outperform existing preference alignment methods such as reinforcement learning from human feedback and self-play adversarial training.
Critical Analysis
The proposed Game-theoretical Preference Optimization (GPO) approach is a promising step towards aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. By framing the problem as a game between the LLM and a preference optimizer agent, the authors introduce a novel and potentially more effective way to achieve this alignment.
One strength of the GPO framework is its ability to identify and address the LLM's weaknesses through the adversarial interaction with the optimizer. This can help the LLM develop more robust and comprehensive strategies for satisfying human preferences, going beyond the limitations of traditional alignment methods.
However, the paper does not delve into the potential challenges and limitations of the GPO approach. For example, it is unclear how the framework would handle situations where the preferences of the optimizer are in conflict or are not well-defined. Additionally, the scalability and computational costs of the game-theoretic optimization process may be a concern, especially as LLMs continue to grow in size and complexity.
Further research is needed to address these issues and explore the broader implications of the GPO framework for aligning LLMs with human values. Careful consideration of ethical and safety concerns should also be a priority, as the misalignment of these powerful models could have significant consequences.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel Game-theoretical Preference Optimization (GPO) approach for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. By framing the alignment problem as a two-player game, the authors demonstrate a promising way to address the shortcomings of existing methods and develop more robust and effective strategies for LLM behavior.
The experimental results show that the GPO framework can outperform other preference alignment techniques, suggesting it could be a valuable tool for ensuring LLMs behave in accordance with human values and principles. However, further research is needed to fully understand the potential challenges and limitations of this approach, as well as its broader implications for the development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.
As the field of AI continues to advance, the need for effective alignment methods will only grow more pressing. The GPO framework represents an important step in this direction, and its continued refinement and exploration could have significant consequences for the future of AI safety and ethics.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
↗️
Adversarial Preference Optimization: Enhancing Your Alignment via RM-LLM Game
Pengyu Cheng, Yifan Yang, Jian Li, Yong Dai, Tianhao Hu, Peixin Cao, Nan Du, Xiaolong Li
0
0
Human preference alignment is essential to improve the interaction quality of large language models (LLMs). Existing alignment methods depend on manually annotated preference data to guide the LLM optimization directions. However, continuously updating LLMs for alignment raises a distribution gap between model-generated samples and human-annotated responses, hindering training effectiveness. To mitigate this issue, previous methods require additional preference annotation on newly generated samples to adapt to the shifted distribution, which consumes a large amount of annotation resources. Targeting more efficient human preference optimization, we propose an Adversarial Preference Optimization (APO) framework, in which the LLM and the reward model update alternatively via a min-max game. Through adversarial training, the reward model can adapt to the shifted generation distribution of the LLM without any additional annotation. With comprehensive experiments, we find the proposed adversarial training framework further enhances existing alignment baselines in terms of LLM helpfulness and harmlessness. The code is at https://github.com/Linear95/APO.
6/4/2024
💬
Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning
Fan Wu, Huseyin A. Inan, Arturs Backurs, Varun Chandrasekaran, Janardhan Kulkarni, Robert Sim
0
0
Positioned between pre-training and user deployment, aligning large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a prevailing strategy for training instruction following-models such as ChatGPT. In this work, we initiate the study of privacy-preserving alignment of LLMs through Differential Privacy (DP) in conjunction with RL. Following the influential work of Ziegler et al. (2020), we study two dominant paradigms: (i) alignment via RL without human in the loop (e.g., positive review generation) and (ii) alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF) (e.g., summarization in a human-preferred way). We give a new DP framework to achieve alignment via RL, and prove its correctness. Our experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach, offering competitive utility while ensuring strong privacy protections.
5/6/2024
🏅
Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning from Preference Human Feedback
Lior Shani, Aviv Rosenberg, Asaf Cassel, Oran Lang, Daniele Calandriello, Avital Zipori, Hila Noga, Orgad Keller, Bilal Piot, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, R'emi Munos
0
0
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become the standard approach for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, allowing LLMs to demonstrate remarkable abilities in various tasks. Existing methods work by emulating the preferences at the single decision (turn) level, limiting their capabilities in settings that require planning or multi-turn interactions to achieve a long-term goal. In this paper, we address this issue by developing novel methods for Reinforcement Learning (RL) from preference feedback between two full multi-turn conversations. In the tabular setting, we present a novel mirror-descent-based policy optimization algorithm for the general multi-turn preference-based RL problem, and prove its convergence to Nash equilibrium. To evaluate performance, we create a new environment, Education Dialogue, where a teacher agent guides a student in learning a random topic, and show that a deep RL variant of our algorithm outperforms RLHF baselines. Finally, we show that in an environment with explicit rewards, our algorithm recovers the same performance as a reward-based RL baseline, despite relying solely on a weaker preference signal.
5/24/2024
💬
The Real, the Better: Aligning Large Language Models with Online Human Behaviors
Guanying Jiang, Lingyong Yan, Haibo Shi, Dawei Yin
0
0
Large language model alignment is widely used and studied to avoid LLM producing unhelpful and harmful responses. However, the lengthy training process and predefined preference bias hinder adaptation to online diverse human preferences. To this end, this paper proposes an alignment framework, called Reinforcement Learning with Human Behavior (RLHB), to align LLMs by directly leveraging real online human behaviors. By taking the generative adversarial framework, the generator is trained to respond following expected human behavior; while the discriminator tries to verify whether the triplets of query, response, and human behavior come from real online environments. Behavior modeling in natural-language form and the multi-model joint training mechanism enable an active and sustainable online alignment. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our proposed methods by both human and automatic evaluations.
5/2/2024