Online Learning with Sublinear Best-Action Queries
0
🧠
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The research paper explores an online learning model with sublinear best-action queries.
- The focus is on developing algorithms that can efficiently learn the optimal action while minimizing the number of queries to determine the best action.
- The results have potential applications in areas like recommendation systems, online advertising, and reinforcement learning.
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world scenarios, such as recommendation systems, online advertising, and reinforcement learning, we need to make decisions quickly while learning the best possible option over time. The research paper proposes an online learning model that can efficiently identify the optimal action by minimizing the number of queries required to determine the best choice.
The key idea is to develop algorithms that can learn the optimal action with a sublinear number of queries, meaning the number of queries grows more slowly than the number of decisions made. This is important because in many applications, the cost of querying or evaluating each action can be high, so minimizing the number of queries is critical for practical implementation.
The paper explores different approaches and provides theoretical guarantees on the performance of these algorithms, showing they can achieve near-optimal regret bounds while keeping the number of queries sublinear. This represents an improvement over traditional online learning methods, which often require a linear number of queries to determine the optimal action.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces an online learning framework where the learner must repeatedly choose an action from a set of possible actions. After each decision, the learner receives a reward, and the goal is to maximize the cumulative reward over time.
The key difference in this model is that the learner can only obtain the reward of the chosen action, but not the rewards of the other actions. However, the learner is allowed to make a limited number of "best-action queries" to determine the action with the highest reward at any given time.
The paper proposes several algorithms that can efficiently learn the optimal action while keeping the number of best-action queries sublinear in the number of decisions made. This is achieved through a combination of exploration, exploitation, and careful query management strategies.
The theoretical analysis of these algorithms shows that they can achieve near-optimal regret bounds, meaning their performance is close to the best possible outcome that could be achieved with full information about the rewards. This is a significant improvement over traditional online learning methods, which often require a linear number of queries to determine the optimal action.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the proposed algorithms and their performance guarantees. However, it is important to note that the analysis assumes certain simplifying assumptions, such as the rewards being bounded and the set of actions being finite.
In practice, real-world applications may have more complex reward structures or action spaces, which could present additional challenges. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that extending the model to more general settings is an interesting direction for future research.
Additionally, the paper does not provide any empirical evaluation of the proposed algorithms on real-world datasets or applications. While the theoretical results are promising, it would be valuable to see how the algorithms perform in practical scenarios and how they compare to other online learning approaches.
Conclusion
The research paper presents an interesting online learning model with sublinear best-action queries, which has the potential to improve the efficiency of decision-making in a variety of applications, such as recommendation systems, online advertising, and reinforcement learning.
The proposed algorithms demonstrate strong theoretical guarantees, suggesting they can learn the optimal action while minimizing the number of costly queries required. This represents an important advancement in the field of online learning and could lead to more practical and scalable solutions in domains where efficient decision-making is crucial.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
0
Online Learning with Sublinear Best-Action Queries
Matteo Russo, Andrea Celli, Riccardo Colini Baldeschi, Federico Fusco, Daniel Haimovich, Dima Karamshuk, Stefano Leonardi, Niek Tax
In online learning, a decision maker repeatedly selects one of a set of actions, with the goal of minimizing the overall loss incurred. Following the recent line of research on algorithms endowed with additional predictive features, we revisit this problem by allowing the decision maker to acquire additional information on the actions to be selected. In particular, we study the power of emph{best-action queries}, which reveal beforehand the identity of the best action at a given time step. In practice, predictive features may be expensive, so we allow the decision maker to issue at most $k$ such queries. We establish tight bounds on the performance any algorithm can achieve when given access to $k$ best-action queries for different types of feedback models. In particular, we prove that in the full feedback model, $k$ queries are enough to achieve an optimal regret of $Thetaleft(minleft{sqrt T, frac Tkright}right)$. This finding highlights the significant multiplicative advantage in the regret rate achievable with even a modest (sublinear) number $k in Omega(sqrt{T})$ of queries. Additionally, we study the challenging setting in which the only available feedback is obtained during the time steps corresponding to the $k$ best-action queries. There, we provide a tight regret rate of $Thetaleft(minleft{frac{T}{sqrt k},frac{T^2}{k^2}right}right)$, which improves over the standard $Thetaleft(frac{T}{sqrt k}right)$ regret rate for label efficient prediction for $k in Omega(T^{2/3})$.
Read more7/24/2024
🧠
0
Adversarial Online Learning with Temporal Feedback Graphs
Khashayar Gatmiry, Jon Schneider
We study a variant of prediction with expert advice where the learner's action at round $t$ is only allowed to depend on losses on a specific subset of the rounds (where the structure of which rounds' losses are visible at time $t$ is provided by a directed feedback graph known to the learner). We present a novel learning algorithm for this setting based on a strategy of partitioning the losses across sub-cliques of this graph. We complement this with a lower bound that is tight in many practical settings, and which we conjecture to be within a constant factor of optimal. For the important class of transitive feedback graphs, we prove that this algorithm is efficiently implementable and obtains the optimal regret bound (up to a universal constant).
Read more7/2/2024
👀
0
Near-optimal Per-Action Regret Bounds for Sleeping Bandits
Quan Nguyen, Nishant A. Mehta
We derive near-optimal per-action regret bounds for sleeping bandits, in which both the sets of available arms and their losses in every round are chosen by an adversary. In a setting with $K$ total arms and at most $A$ available arms in each round over $T$ rounds, the best known upper bound is $O(Ksqrt{TAln{K}})$, obtained indirectly via minimizing internal sleeping regrets. Compared to the minimax $Omega(sqrt{TA})$ lower bound, this upper bound contains an extra multiplicative factor of $Kln{K}$. We address this gap by directly minimizing the per-action regret using generalized versions of EXP3, EXP3-IX and FTRL with Tsallis entropy, thereby obtaining near-optimal bounds of order $O(sqrt{TAln{K}})$ and $O(sqrt{Tsqrt{AK}})$. We extend our results to the setting of bandits with advice from sleeping experts, generalizing EXP4 along the way. This leads to new proofs for a number of existing adaptive and tracking regret bounds for standard non-sleeping bandits. Extending our results to the bandit version of experts that report their confidences leads to new bounds for the confidence regret that depends primarily on the sum of experts' confidences. We prove a lower bound, showing that for any minimax optimal algorithms, there exists an action whose regret is sublinear in $T$ but linear in the number of its active rounds.
Read more5/31/2024
🗣️
0
Online learning of a panoply of quantum objects
Akshay Bansal, Ian George, Soumik Ghosh, Jamie Sikora, Alice Zheng
In many quantum tasks, there is an unknown quantum object that one wishes to learn. An online strategy for this task involves adaptively refining a hypothesis to reproduce such an object or its measurement statistics. A common evaluation metric for such a strategy is its regret, or roughly the accumulated errors in hypothesis statistics. We prove a sublinear regret bound for learning over general subsets of positive semidefinite matrices via the regularized-follow-the-leader algorithm and apply it to various settings where one wishes to learn quantum objects. For concrete applications, we present a sublinear regret bound for learning quantum states, effects, channels, interactive measurements, strategies, co-strategies, and the collection of inner products of pure states. Our bound applies to many other quantum objects with compact, convex representations. In proving our regret bound, we establish various matrix analysis results useful in quantum information theory. This includes a generalization of Pinsker's inequality for arbitrary positive semidefinite operators with possibly different traces, which may be of independent interest and applicable to more general classes of divergences.
Read more6/7/2024