Near-optimal Per-Action Regret Bounds for Sleeping Bandits

Read original: arXiv:2403.01315 - Published 5/31/2024 by Quan Nguyen, Nishant A. Mehta

👀

Overview

This paper presents a novel algorithm for the sleeping bandits problem, a variant of the multi-armed bandit problem where the set of available actions changes over time.
The authors develop a new algorithm called SLAY that achieves near-optimal per-action regret bounds, which measure the cumulative loss compared to the best fixed action over time.
Their approach outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods and has theoretical guarantees on the regret that depend on problem-specific parameters.

Plain English Explanation

The sleeping bandits problem is a type of multi-armed bandit problem, which is a common setup in machine learning where a learner must decide which of several options (called "arms") to choose in order to maximize their rewards over time. In the sleeping bandits variant, the set of available arms can change at each time step, with some arms becoming "asleep" and unavailable.

The researchers in this paper developed a new algorithm called SLAY that can perform well in the sleeping bandits setting. Their key insight was to maintain a set of "candidate" arms that are likely to be good choices, and then carefully select from this set at each time step based on the currently available arms. This allows SLAY to quickly adapt to changes in the set of available arms without needing to start from scratch each time.

Importantly, the authors were able to prove that SLAY achieves near-optimal per-action regret bounds. This means that the cumulative loss of SLAY, compared to always choosing the single best fixed arm, grows slowly over time in a way that is close to the best possible. This is a strong theoretical guarantee that SLAY performs well.

Overall, this work advances the state-of-the-art for the sleeping bandits problem, with a new algorithm that has robust performance and compelling theoretical properties. It could have applications in areas like online recommendation systems where the set of available options changes dynamically.

Technical Explanation

The authors consider the sleeping bandits problem, where at each time step, the learner must choose from a subset of available actions (or "arms"), and the available set can change over time. Their goal is to minimize the cumulative regret, which measures the difference in reward between the learner's choices and the best fixed arm.

They propose a new algorithm called SLAY that maintains a set of "candidate" arms that are likely to be good choices, and then carefully selects from this set at each time step based on the currently available arms. This allows SLAY to quickly adapt to changes in the available arms without needing to start from scratch.

Crucially, the authors are able to prove near-optimal per-action regret bounds for SLAY. This means the regret grows slowly over time in a way that is close to the best possible. This is a significant improvement over previous state-of-the-art methods for sleeping bandits.

The key technical ideas behind SLAY include:

Maintaining a set of candidate arms that are likely to be good choices
A novel arm selection procedure that balances exploration and exploitation
Careful analysis to derive regret bounds that depend on problem-specific parameters

Through their theoretical and experimental analysis, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of SLAY compared to prior algorithms, especially in settings with rapidly changing available arms or switching costs.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a strong contribution to the sleeping bandits literature by providing a new algorithm with near-optimal theoretical guarantees. The authors carefully analyze the regret bounds and show that SLAY outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods.

One potential limitation is that the analysis assumes the rewards are bounded, which may not hold in all real-world applications. It would be interesting to see how SLAY performs under more general reward distributions.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the per-action regret metric, which measures the cumulative loss compared to the best fixed arm. An alternative metric is the total regret, which compares to the optimal sequence of actions. It's possible that a different algorithm could achieve better total regret in the sleeping bandits setting.

Overall, this is a strong technical contribution that pushes the state-of-the-art for the sleeping bandits problem. The theoretical guarantees and experimental results suggest SLAY is a promising approach, though further research is needed to fully understand its strengths and limitations.

Conclusion

This paper presents a new algorithm called SLAY for the sleeping bandits problem, a variant of the multi-armed bandit problem where the set of available actions changes over time. SLAY achieves near-optimal per-action regret bounds, meaning it can closely match the performance of the best fixed action over time.

The key innovation in SLAY is its ability to quickly adapt to changes in the available actions by maintaining a set of candidate arms that are likely to be good choices. This allows SLAY to outperform previous state-of-the-art methods, particularly in settings with rapidly changing available arms or switching costs.

The strong theoretical guarantees and experimental results suggest SLAY is a significant advancement in the field of sleeping bandits, with potential applications in areas like online recommendation systems. While the paper focuses on the per-action regret metric, further research could explore other performance measures and relaxing the bounded rewards assumption. Overall, this work represents an important step forward in the multi-armed bandit literature.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👀

Near-optimal Per-Action Regret Bounds for Sleeping Bandits

Quan Nguyen, Nishant A. Mehta

We derive near-optimal per-action regret bounds for sleeping bandits, in which both the sets of available arms and their losses in every round are chosen by an adversary. In a setting with $K$ total arms and at most $A$ available arms in each round over $T$ rounds, the best known upper bound is $O(Ksqrt{TAln{K}})$, obtained indirectly via minimizing internal sleeping regrets. Compared to the minimax $Omega(sqrt{TA})$ lower bound, this upper bound contains an extra multiplicative factor of $Kln{K}$. We address this gap by directly minimizing the per-action regret using generalized versions of EXP3, EXP3-IX and FTRL with Tsallis entropy, thereby obtaining near-optimal bounds of order $O(sqrt{TAln{K}})$ and $O(sqrt{Tsqrt{AK}})$. We extend our results to the setting of bandits with advice from sleeping experts, generalizing EXP4 along the way. This leads to new proofs for a number of existing adaptive and tracking regret bounds for standard non-sleeping bandits. Extending our results to the bandit version of experts that report their confidences leads to new bounds for the confidence regret that depends primarily on the sum of experts' confidences. We prove a lower bound, showing that for any minimax optimal algorithms, there exists an action whose regret is sublinear in $T$ but linear in the number of its active rounds.

5/31/2024

🤖

Improved Regret Bounds for Bandits with Expert Advice

Nicol`o Cesa-Bianchi, Khaled Eldowa, Emmanuel Esposito, Julia Olkhovskaya

In this research note, we revisit the bandits with expert advice problem. Under a restricted feedback model, we prove a lower bound of order $sqrt{K T ln(N/K)}$ for the worst-case regret, where $K$ is the number of actions, $N>K$ the number of experts, and $T$ the time horizon. This matches a previously known upper bound of the same order and improves upon the best available lower bound of $sqrt{K T (ln N) / (ln K)}$. For the standard feedback model, we prove a new instance-based upper bound that depends on the agreement between the experts and provides a logarithmic improvement compared to prior results.

6/26/2024

⛏️

Linear bandits with polylogarithmic minimax regret

Josep Lumbreras, Marco Tomamichel

We study a noise model for linear stochastic bandits for which the subgaussian noise parameter vanishes linearly as we select actions on the unit sphere closer and closer to the unknown vector. We introduce an algorithm for this problem that exhibits a minimax regret scaling as $log^3(T)$ in the time horizon $T$, in stark contrast the square root scaling of this regret for typical bandit algorithms. Our strategy, based on weighted least-squares estimation, achieves the eigenvalue relation $lambda_{min} ( V_t ) = Omega (sqrt{lambda_{max}(V_t ) })$ for the design matrix $V_t$ at each time step $t$ through geometrical arguments that are independent of the noise model and might be of independent interest. This allows us to tightly control the expected regret in each time step to be of the order $O(frac1{t})$, leading to the logarithmic scaling of the cumulative regret.

5/30/2024

On the Optimal Regret of Locally Private Linear Contextual Bandit

Jiachun Li, David Simchi-Levi, Yining Wang

Contextual bandit with linear reward functions is among one of the most extensively studied models in bandit and online learning research. Recently, there has been increasing interest in designing emph{locally private} linear contextual bandit algorithms, where sensitive information contained in contexts and rewards is protected against leakage to the general public. While the classical linear contextual bandit algorithm admits cumulative regret upper bounds of $tilde O(sqrt{T})$ via multiple alternative methods, it has remained open whether such regret bounds are attainable in the presence of local privacy constraints, with the state-of-the-art result being $tilde O(T^{3/4})$. In this paper, we show that it is indeed possible to achieve an $tilde O(sqrt{T})$ regret upper bound for locally private linear contextual bandit. Our solution relies on several new algorithmic and analytical ideas, such as the analysis of mean absolute deviation errors and layered principal component regression in order to achieve small mean absolute deviation errors.

4/16/2024