On the Minimax Regret in Online Ranking with Top-k Feedback
0
🏋️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper focuses on online ranking algorithms that receive partial feedback in the form of relevance scores for the top-k ranked items.
- The authors build upon previous work by Chaudhuri and Tewari (2017) and provide a comprehensive analysis of minimax regret rates for various ranking performance measures under the top-k feedback model.
- The authors also present an efficient algorithm that achieves the minimax regret rate for the Precision@n metric.
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world applications, such as search engine optimization or recommendation systems, a learning algorithm is tasked with ranking a set of items in order of relevance. The algorithm receives feedback on its ranking in the form of relevance scores, which are typically obtained through human annotation. However, obtaining full feedback on all ranked items can be costly or impractical.
This paper explores a partial feedback setting, where the algorithm only receives relevance scores for the top-k ranked items. The authors build upon prior work that introduced a framework for analyzing online ranking algorithms with this type of partial feedback. They delve deeper into this problem and solve several open questions posed by the previous research.
Specifically, the authors provide a complete characterization of the minimax regret rates, which measure how well the algorithm performs compared to the best possible ranking, for various ranking performance metrics. These metrics include Pairwise Loss, Discounted Cumulative Gain, and Precision@n. Furthermore, the authors present an efficient algorithm that achieves the optimal minimax regret rate for the Precision@n metric.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on the online ranking problem, where a learning algorithm sequentially ranks a set of items and receives feedback on its ranking in the form of relevance scores. The authors consider a partial feedback setting, where the algorithm only receives relevance scores for the top-k ranked items.
Building upon the framework developed by Chaudhuri and Tewari (2017), the authors provide a comprehensive analysis of the minimax regret rates for several ranking performance measures under the top-k feedback model. They derive tight bounds on the minimax regret rates for Pairwise Loss, Discounted Cumulative Gain, and Precision@n. These bounds characterize the best possible performance an algorithm can achieve in this partial feedback setting.
Additionally, the authors present an efficient algorithm that matches the minimax regret rate for the Precision@n metric. This algorithm leverages techniques from the area of partial monitoring, which is a crucial component in the analysis of online ranking with top-k feedback.
The authors' findings extend the understanding of online ranking with partial feedback and provide a strong foundation for the design and analysis of practical ranking algorithms in settings where obtaining full feedback is challenging or expensive.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous analysis of online ranking algorithms with top-k feedback, addressing several open problems posed by previous research. The authors' comprehensive treatment of the minimax regret rates for various ranking performance measures is a significant contribution to the field.
One potential limitation of the work is that the analysis is primarily theoretical, and the practical applicability of the derived algorithms may depend on the specific characteristics of the real-world ranking problems. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future research could focus on empirical evaluations and the development of heuristics for adapting the algorithms to different problem settings.
Additionally, the analysis assumes a specific feedback model where relevance scores are provided for the top-k ranked items. In some applications, the feedback may take different forms, such as binary relevance judgments or pairwise comparisons. Extending the framework to handle more diverse feedback scenarios could be an area for further research.
Overall, the paper presents a strong theoretical foundation for understanding online ranking with partial feedback and provides a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working in this domain. By challenging the assumptions and exploring the limitations of the current work, future studies can build upon these findings to develop more robust and practical ranking algorithms.
Conclusion
This paper makes significant advancements in the understanding of online ranking algorithms with partial feedback, specifically in the form of relevance scores for the top-k ranked items. The authors provide a comprehensive analysis of the minimax regret rates for several key ranking performance measures, extending and solving open problems from previous research.
The authors' findings contribute to the broader field of online learning and partial monitoring, and have the potential to influence the design of practical ranking algorithms in applications where obtaining full feedback is challenging or expensive. The detailed technical explanations and critical analysis presented in the paper offer valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working in this domain.
By laying a solid theoretical foundation and identifying areas for further exploration, this work paves the way for future studies to build upon these insights and develop more robust and efficient online ranking algorithms that can deliver high-quality results even with limited feedback.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏋️
0
On the Minimax Regret in Online Ranking with Top-k Feedback
Mingyuan Zhang, Ambuj Tewari
In online ranking, a learning algorithm sequentially ranks a set of items and receives feedback on its ranking in the form of relevance scores. Since obtaining relevance scores typically involves human annotation, it is of great interest to consider a partial feedback setting where feedback is restricted to the top-$k$ items in the rankings. Chaudhuri and Tewari [2017] developed a framework to analyze online ranking algorithms with top $k$ feedback. A key element in their work was the use of techniques from partial monitoring. In this paper, we further investigate online ranking with top $k$ feedback and solve some open problems posed by Chaudhuri and Tewari [2017]. We provide a full characterization of minimax regret rates with the top $k$ feedback model for all $k$ and for the following ranking performance measures: Pairwise Loss, Discounted Cumulative Gain, and Precision@n. In addition, we give an efficient algorithm that achieves the minimax regret rate for Precision@n.
Read more4/15/2024
0
Adaptively Learning to Select-Rank in Online Platforms
Jingyuan Wang, Perry Dong, Ying Jin, Ruohan Zhan, Zhengyuan Zhou
Ranking algorithms are fundamental to various online platforms across e-commerce sites to content streaming services. Our research addresses the challenge of adaptively ranking items from a candidate pool for heterogeneous users, a key component in personalizing user experience. We develop a user response model that considers diverse user preferences and the varying effects of item positions, aiming to optimize overall user satisfaction with the ranked list. We frame this problem within a contextual bandits framework, with each ranked list as an action. Our approach incorporates an upper confidence bound to adjust predicted user satisfaction scores and selects the ranking action that maximizes these adjusted scores, efficiently solved via maximum weight imperfect matching. We demonstrate that our algorithm achieves a cumulative regret bound of $O(dsqrt{NKT})$ for ranking $K$ out of $N$ items in a $d$-dimensional context space over $T$ rounds, under the assumption that user responses follow a generalized linear model. This regret alleviates dependence on the ambient action space, whose cardinality grows exponentially with $N$ and $K$ (thus rendering direct application of existing adaptive learning algorithms -- such as UCB or Thompson sampling -- infeasible). Experiments conducted on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate our algorithm outperforms the baseline.
Read more6/10/2024
🧠
0
Online Learning with Sublinear Best-Action Queries
Matteo Russo, Andrea Celli, Riccardo Colini Baldeschi, Federico Fusco, Daniel Haimovich, Dima Karamshuk, Stefano Leonardi, Niek Tax
In online learning, a decision maker repeatedly selects one of a set of actions, with the goal of minimizing the overall loss incurred. Following the recent line of research on algorithms endowed with additional predictive features, we revisit this problem by allowing the decision maker to acquire additional information on the actions to be selected. In particular, we study the power of emph{best-action queries}, which reveal beforehand the identity of the best action at a given time step. In practice, predictive features may be expensive, so we allow the decision maker to issue at most $k$ such queries. We establish tight bounds on the performance any algorithm can achieve when given access to $k$ best-action queries for different types of feedback models. In particular, we prove that in the full feedback model, $k$ queries are enough to achieve an optimal regret of $Thetaleft(minleft{sqrt T, frac Tkright}right)$. This finding highlights the significant multiplicative advantage in the regret rate achievable with even a modest (sublinear) number $k in Omega(sqrt{T})$ of queries. Additionally, we study the challenging setting in which the only available feedback is obtained during the time steps corresponding to the $k$ best-action queries. There, we provide a tight regret rate of $Thetaleft(minleft{frac{T}{sqrt k},frac{T^2}{k^2}right}right)$, which improves over the standard $Thetaleft(frac{T}{sqrt k}right)$ regret rate for label efficient prediction for $k in Omega(T^{2/3})$.
Read more7/24/2024
🏷️
0
The Real Price of Bandit Information in Multiclass Classification
Liad Erez, Alon Cohen, Tomer Koren, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran
We revisit the classical problem of multiclass classification with bandit feedback (Kakade, Shalev-Shwartz and Tewari, 2008), where each input classifies to one of $K$ possible labels and feedback is restricted to whether the predicted label is correct or not. Our primary inquiry is with regard to the dependency on the number of labels $K$, and whether $T$-step regret bounds in this setting can be improved beyond the $smash{sqrt{KT}}$ dependence exhibited by existing algorithms. Our main contribution is in showing that the minimax regret of bandit multiclass is in fact more nuanced, and is of the form $smash{widetilde{Theta}left(min left{|H| + sqrt{T}, sqrt{KT log |H|} right} right) }$, where $H$ is the underlying (finite) hypothesis class. In particular, we present a new bandit classification algorithm that guarantees regret $smash{widetilde{O}(|H|+sqrt{T})}$, improving over classical algorithms for moderately-sized hypothesis classes, and give a matching lower bound establishing tightness of the upper bounds (up to log-factors) in all parameter regimes.
Read more6/21/2024