Online vs Offline: A Comparative Study of First-Party and Third-Party Evaluations of Social Chatbots

Overview

• This paper presents a comparative study of first-party and third-party evaluations of social chatbots.
• The researchers conducted experiments to assess how users' perceptions and judgments of chatbots differ when interacting with them directly (first-party) versus observing others interact with them (third-party).
• The findings provide insights into the factors that influence user experience and evaluation of social chatbots in different contexts.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to understand how people's opinions of chatbots may differ depending on whether they interact with the chatbot themselves or just observe someone else interacting with it. [Chatbots are computer programs designed to have natural conversations with humans.]

In the first-party evaluation, participants directly engaged with the chatbot and provided their feedback. In the third-party evaluation, participants watched videos of someone else talking to the chatbot and then gave their own impressions.

The researchers found that people's judgments of the chatbot's capabilities, likability, and overall quality differed between the first-party and third-party conditions. For example, people who directly interacted with the chatbot tended to rate it more positively than those who just observed the interaction.

This suggests that the context in which people evaluate chatbots - whether they experience it firsthand or just witness it - can significantly impact their perceptions and judgments. The researchers believe these findings have important implications for how we design, deploy, and evaluate social chatbots in the real world.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted two experiments to compare first-party and third-party evaluations of social chatbots.

In the first experiment, participants directly interacted with a chatbot and provided feedback on its capabilities, likability, and overall quality (first-party evaluation). In the second experiment, participants watched videos of someone else interacting with the same chatbot and then gave their own assessments (third-party evaluation).

The results showed that participants' ratings of the chatbot were generally more positive in the first-party condition compared to the third-party condition. Participants who directly interacted with the chatbot tended to view it as more capable, likable, and higher quality overall than those who merely observed the interaction.

The researchers attribute these differences to factors like the level of immersion, emotional investment, and perceived control experienced by participants in the two conditions. Direct interaction may have led to a more positive overall impression, whereas observing the interaction from the outside resulted in more critical or detached judgments.

These findings highlight the importance of considering the evaluation context when assessing the performance and user experience of social chatbots. The researchers suggest that both first-party and third-party perspectives should be incorporated to get a more comprehensive understanding of chatbot capabilities and user perceptions.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their study. First, the sample size was relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Second, the chatbot used in the experiments was a relatively simple system, and more complex or advanced chatbots may produce different results.

Additionally, the researchers did not explore potential moderating factors, such as individual differences in personality, cognitive style, or prior experience with chatbots, that could influence people's evaluations. It's possible that some users may be more susceptible to the effects of the evaluation context than others.

Another potential concern is the use of pre-recorded videos in the third-party condition, which may not fully capture the dynamic nature of real-time interactions. In a true third-party scenario, observers may have access to additional contextual information that could shape their impressions.

Despite these limitations, the study provides valuable insights into the role of evaluation context in shaping perceptions of social chatbots. The findings underscore the importance of considering multiple perspectives and contexts when assessing the user experience and performance of these systems.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comparative study of first-party and third-party evaluations of social chatbots. The results suggest that the evaluation context - whether users directly interact with the chatbot or merely observe others doing so - can significantly influence their perceptions of the chatbot's capabilities, likability, and overall quality.

These findings have important implications for the design, deployment, and assessment of social chatbots. Researchers and practitioners should consider incorporating both first-party and third-party perspectives to gain a more comprehensive understanding of chatbot performance and user experience. By doing so, they can develop more effective and user-friendly conversational agents that can better meet the needs and expectations of diverse users and contexts.