Designing and Evaluating Multi-Chatbot Interface for Human-AI Communication: Preliminary Findings from a Persuasion Task

Read original: arXiv:2406.19648 - Published 7/1/2024 by Sion Yoon, Tae Eun Kim, Yoo Jung Oh
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This study examines how the availability of multiple AI chatbots impacts human-AI communication, particularly in a persuasion setting aimed at promoting charitable donations.
  • The researchers developed an online environment that enables multi-chatbot communication and conducted a pilot experiment using two AI chatbots - one representing Save the Children and one representing UNICEF - to promote charitable donations.
  • The paper presents the development process of the multi-chatbot interface and preliminary findings from the pilot experiment, including analysis of qualitative and quantitative feedback.

Plain English Explanation

The rise of language models like ChatGPT has reshaped how humans communicate with AI. However, most research has focused on one-on-one interactions, leaving much to be explored about how humans interact with multiple AI chatbots at once.

This study looked at what happens when people communicate with not just one, but two AI chatbots - one representing the charity Save the Children, and one representing UNICEF. The researchers built a special online environment to enable this multi-chatbot interaction, and then ran an experiment where people were encouraged to donate to charity through conversations with the two chatbots.

The researchers share how they developed this multi-chatbot interface, and present some early findings from the experiment. They analyzed both the qualitative feedback (what people said) and quantitative data (measurable outcomes) to understand the impact of this multi-chatbot communication. The paper also discusses the limitations of the study and areas for further research.

Technical Explanation

The researchers designed an online environment that enabled participants to communicate with two separate AI chatbots - one representing Save the Children and one representing UNICEF - in a persuasion setting aimed at promoting charitable donations.

The chatbots were built using GPT-based language models, which are a type of large language model capable of engaging in human-like conversations. The researchers developed a custom interface to facilitate the multi-chatbot interaction, allowing participants to switch between conversing with the two chatbots.

In the pilot experiment, participants were prompted to engage in conversations with the two chatbots and were encouraged to donate to charity. The researchers collected both qualitative feedback (e.g., participant comments) and quantitative data (e.g., donation amounts) to analyze the impact of this multi-chatbot communication.

The paper presents the researchers' process for developing the multi-chatbot interface, as well as preliminary findings from the pilot study. The analysis suggests that the presence of multiple chatbots influenced the persuasion dynamics, with participants engaging in more empathetic and multi-modal interactions compared to typical one-on-one chatbot scenarios.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges the limited scope of the pilot study and calls for further research to better understand the dynamics of human-AI communication in group settings. Some potential limitations include the small sample size, the specific persuasion context, and the use of only two chatbots.

Additionally, the researchers do not delve deeply into the ethical implications of using AI chatbots for persuasion purposes, such as concerns around transparency, human-to-human-to-human communication, and the potential for manipulation.

Future research could explore the impact of multi-chatbot communication in a wider range of contexts, examine the long-term effects on user engagement and behavior, and address the ethical considerations more thoroughly.

Conclusion

This study represents an important step in understanding the evolving dynamics of human-AI communication, particularly in group settings. The researchers' development of a multi-chatbot interface and their preliminary findings suggest that the presence of multiple chatbots can influence the persuasion dynamics in ways that differ from typical one-on-one interactions.

While further research is needed to fully explore the implications of this technology, this paper highlights the potential for multi-chatbot communication to shape various domains, from charitable giving to other persuasion-oriented applications. As AI language models continue to advance, understanding these emerging communication patterns will be crucial for designing ethical and effective human-AI interactions.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

Designing and Evaluating Multi-Chatbot Interface for Human-AI Communication: Preliminary Findings from a Persuasion Task

Sion Yoon, Tae Eun Kim, Yoo Jung Oh

The dynamics of human-AI communication have been reshaped by language models such as ChatGPT. However, extant research has primarily focused on dyadic communication, leaving much to be explored regarding the dynamics of human-AI communication in group settings. The availability of multiple language model chatbots presents a unique opportunity for scholars to better understand the interaction between humans and multiple chatbots. This study examines the impact of multi-chatbot communication in a specific persuasion setting: promoting charitable donations. We developed an online environment that enables multi-chatbot communication and conducted a pilot experiment utilizing two GPT-based chatbots, Save the Children and UNICEF chatbots, to promote charitable donations. In this study, we present our development process of the multi-chatbot interface and present preliminary findings from a pilot experiment. Analysis of qualitative and quantitative feedback are presented, and limitations are addressed.

Read more

7/1/2024

Unveiling the Impact of Multi-Modal Interactions on User Engagement: A Comprehensive Evaluation in AI-driven Conversations
Total Score

0

Unveiling the Impact of Multi-Modal Interactions on User Engagement: A Comprehensive Evaluation in AI-driven Conversations

Lichao Zhang, Jia Yu, Shuai Zhang, Long Li, Yangyang Zhong, Guanbao Liang, Yuming Yan, Qing Ma, Fangsheng Weng, Fayu Pan, Jing Li, Renjun Xu, Zhenzhong Lan

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced user-bot interactions, enabling more complex and coherent dialogues. However, the prevalent text-only modality might not fully exploit the potential for effective user engagement. This paper explores the impact of multi-modal interactions, which incorporate images and audio alongside text, on user engagement in chatbot conversations. We conduct a comprehensive analysis using a diverse set of chatbots and real-user interaction data, employing metrics such as retention rate and conversation length to evaluate user engagement. Our findings reveal a significant enhancement in user engagement with multi-modal interactions compared to text-only dialogues. Notably, the incorporation of a third modality significantly amplifies engagement beyond the benefits observed with just two modalities. These results suggest that multi-modal interactions optimize cognitive processing and facilitate richer information comprehension. This study underscores the importance of multi-modality in chatbot design, offering valuable insights for creating more engaging and immersive AI communication experiences and informing the broader AI community about the benefits of multi-modal interactions in enhancing user engagement.

Read more

6/24/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Empathy Through Multimodality in Conversational Interfaces

Mahyar Abbasian, Iman Azimi, Mohammad Feli, Amir M. Rahmani, Ramesh Jain

Agents represent one of the most emerging applications of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI, with their effectiveness hinging on multimodal capabilities to navigate complex user environments. Conversational Health Agents (CHAs), a prime example of this, are redefining healthcare by offering nuanced support that transcends textual analysis to incorporate emotional intelligence. This paper introduces an LLM-based CHA engineered for rich, multimodal dialogue-especially in the realm of mental health support. It adeptly interprets and responds to users' emotional states by analyzing multimodal cues, thus delivering contextually aware and empathetically resonant verbal responses. Our implementation leverages the versatile openCHA framework, and our comprehensive evaluation involves neutral prompts expressed in diverse emotional tones: sadness, anger, and joy. We evaluate the consistency and repeatability of the planning capability of the proposed CHA. Furthermore, human evaluators critique the CHA's empathic delivery, with findings revealing a striking concordance between the CHA's outputs and evaluators' assessments. These results affirm the indispensable role of vocal (soon multimodal) emotion recognition in strengthening the empathetic connection built by CHAs, cementing their place at the forefront of interactive, compassionate digital health solutions.

Read more

5/9/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Dialogue You Can Trust: Human and AI Perspectives on Generated Conversations

Ike Ebubechukwu, Johane Takeuchi, Antonello Ceravola, Frank Joublin

As dialogue systems and chatbots increasingly integrate into everyday interactions, the need for efficient and accurate evaluation methods becomes paramount. This study explores the comparative performance of human and AI assessments across a range of dialogue scenarios, focusing on seven key performance indicators (KPIs): Coherence, Innovation, Concreteness, Goal Contribution, Commonsense Contradiction, Incorrect Fact, and Redundancy. Utilizing the GPT-4o API, we generated a diverse dataset of conversations and conducted a two-part experimental analysis. In Experiment 1, we evaluated multi-party conversations on Coherence, Innovation, Concreteness, and Goal Contribution, revealing that GPT models align closely with human judgments. Notably, both human and AI evaluators exhibited a tendency towards binary judgment rather than linear scaling, highlighting a shared challenge in these assessments. Experiment 2 extended the work of Finch et al. (2023) by focusing on dyadic dialogues and assessing Commonsense Contradiction, Incorrect Fact, and Redundancy. The results indicate that while GPT-4o demonstrates strong performance in maintaining factual accuracy and commonsense reasoning, it still struggles with reducing redundancy and self-contradiction. Our findings underscore the potential of GPT models to closely replicate human evaluation in dialogue systems, while also pointing to areas for improvement. This research offers valuable insights for advancing the development and implementation of more refined dialogue evaluation methodologies, contributing to the evolution of more effective and human-like AI communication tools.

Read more

9/11/2024