Optimal Control of Logically Constrained Partially Observable and Multi-Agent Markov Decision Processes
2305.14736
0
0
👀
Abstract
Autonomous systems often have logical constraints arising, for example, from safety, operational, or regulatory requirements. Such constraints can be expressed using temporal logic specifications. The system state is often partially observable. Moreover, it could encompass a team of multiple agents with a common objective but disparate information structures and constraints. In this paper, we first introduce an optimal control theory for partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) with finite linear temporal logic constraints. We provide a structured methodology for synthesizing policies that maximize a cumulative reward while ensuring that the probability of satisfying a temporal logic constraint is sufficiently high. Our approach comes with guarantees on approximate reward optimality and constraint satisfaction. We then build on this approach to design an optimal control framework for logically constrained multi-agent settings with information asymmetry. We illustrate the effectiveness of our approach by implementing it on several case studies.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Autonomous systems often face logical constraints from safety, operational, or regulatory requirements.
- These constraints can be expressed using temporal logic specifications.
- The system state may be partially observable and involve a team of multiple agents with common objectives but disparate information and constraints.
- This paper introduces an optimal control theory for partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) with finite linear temporal logic constraints.
- It provides a methodology for synthesizing policies that maximize cumulative reward while ensuring a high probability of satisfying temporal logic constraints.
- The approach is then extended to multi-agent settings with information asymmetry.
Plain English Explanation
Autonomous systems, like self-driving cars or robots, often have to follow certain rules or constraints. These constraints might come from safety requirements, operational needs, or government regulations. The researchers in this paper show how these constraints can be expressed using a type of logical language called "temporal logic."
The systems these autonomous agents operate in may not always have complete information about the world around them. There could also be multiple agents, like a team of robots, working together towards a common goal but having different information and constraints.
The key contribution of this paper is a method for designing control policies, or decision-making strategies, for these partially observable, logically constrained, multi-agent systems. The policies aim to maximize the total reward the system can earn over time, while also ensuring a high probability that the system will satisfy the logical constraints.
This approach allows autonomous systems to operate effectively and safely, even in complex environments with incomplete information and multiple interacting agents.
Technical Explanation
The paper first introduces an optimal control theory for POMDPs with finite linear temporal logic constraints. This allows the researchers to model systems where the full state of the environment is not directly observable, but can be inferred probabilistically.
The temporal logic constraints represent requirements like "the system must visit location A infinitely often" or "the system must avoid obstacle B at all times." The researchers develop a structured methodology to synthesize control policies that maximize cumulative reward while ensuring a high probability of satisfying these temporal logic constraints.
This approach comes with guarantees on the approximate optimality of the reward and the satisfaction of the constraints.
The paper then builds on this framework to design an optimal control system for logically constrained multi-agent settings with information asymmetry. This allows for the coordination of teams of autonomous agents that have different information and constraints, but are working towards a common objective.
The effectiveness of the proposed methods is demonstrated through several case studies.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a significant contribution to the field of autonomous systems by providing a principled framework for handling logical constraints and partial observability in both single-agent and multi-agent settings.
One potential limitation is the assumption of finite linear temporal logic constraints. More expressive temporal logics, such as the full linear temporal logic, could be explored to handle a wider range of requirements.
Additionally, the paper does not explicitly address the problem of determining what information should be observed to strike the best balance between reward maximization and constraint satisfaction. This could be an interesting avenue for future research.
Overall, the proposed approach represents a significant step forward in the field of constrained multi-agent decision-making under partial observability, with promising applications in robotics, transportation, and other domains of autonomous systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel framework for designing optimal control policies for autonomous systems with logical constraints and partial observability, including in multi-agent settings. The key contributions are the structured methodology for maximizing cumulative reward while ensuring a high probability of satisfying temporal logic constraints, as well as the extension of this approach to coordinating teams of agents with information asymmetry.
The proposed techniques have the potential to enable more capable, reliable, and safe autonomous systems that can operate effectively in complex, real-world environments. While the paper identifies some areas for further research, the overall approach represents an important advancement in the field of constrained decision-making for autonomous agents.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👀
Recursively-Constrained Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes
Qi Heng Ho, Tyler Becker, Benjamin Kraske, Zakariya Laouar, Martin S. Feather, Federico Rossi, Morteza Lahijanian, Zachary N. Sunberg
0
0
Many sequential decision problems involve optimizing one objective function while imposing constraints on other objectives. Constrained Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (C-POMDP) model this case with transition uncertainty and partial observability. In this work, we first show that C-POMDPs violate the optimal substructure property over successive decision steps and thus may exhibit behaviors that are undesirable for some (e.g., safety critical) applications. Additionally, online re-planning in C-POMDPs is often ineffective due to the inconsistency resulting from this violation. To address these drawbacks, we introduce the Recursively-Constrained POMDP (RC-POMDP), which imposes additional history-dependent cost constraints on the C-POMDP. We show that, unlike C-POMDPs, RC-POMDPs always have deterministic optimal policies and that optimal policies obey Bellman's principle of optimality. We also present a point-based dynamic programming algorithm for RC-POMDPs. Evaluations on benchmark problems demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithm and show that policies for RC-POMDPs produce more desirable behaviors than policies for C-POMDPs.
6/6/2024
🏅
Provable Representation with Efficient Planning for Partial Observable Reinforcement Learning
Hongming Zhang, Tongzheng Ren, Chenjun Xiao, Dale Schuurmans, Bo Dai
0
0
In most real-world reinforcement learning applications, state information is only partially observable, which breaks the Markov decision process assumption and leads to inferior performance for algorithms that conflate observations with state. Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs), on the other hand, provide a general framework that allows for partial observability to be accounted for in learning, exploration and planning, but presents significant computational and statistical challenges. To address these difficulties, we develop a representation-based perspective that leads to a coherent framework and tractable algorithmic approach for practical reinforcement learning from partial observations. We provide a theoretical analysis for justifying the statistical efficiency of the proposed algorithm, and also empirically demonstrate the proposed algorithm can surpass state-of-the-art performance with partial observations across various benchmarks, advancing reliable reinforcement learning towards more practical applications.
6/12/2024
Optimal Control Synthesis with Relaxed Global Temporal Logic Specifications for Homogeneous Multi-robot Teams
Disha Kamale, Cristian-Ioan Vasile
0
0
In this work, we address the problem of control synthesis for a homogeneous team of robots given a global temporal logic specification and formal user preferences for relaxation in case of infeasibility. The relaxation preferences are represented as a Weighted Finite-state Edit System and are used to compute a relaxed specification automaton that captures all allowable relaxations of the mission specification and their costs. For synthesis, we introduce a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) formulation that combines the motion of the team of robots with the relaxed specification automaton. Our approach combines automata-based and MILP-based methods and leverages the strengths of both approaches while avoiding their shortcomings. Specifically, the relaxed specification automaton explicitly accounts for the progress towards satisfaction, and the MILP-based optimization approach avoids the state-space explosion associated with explicit product-automata construction, thereby efficiently solving the problem. The case studies highlight the efficiency of the proposed approach.
6/5/2024
🖼️
What should be observed for optimal reward in POMDPs?
Alyzia-Maria Konsta, Alberto Lluch Lafuente, Christoph Matheja
0
0
Partially observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) are a standard model for agents making decisions in uncertain environments. Most work on POMDPs focuses on synthesizing strategies based on the available capabilities. However, system designers can often control an agent's observation capabilities, e.g. by placing or selecting sensors. This raises the question of how one should select an agent's sensors cost-effectively such that it achieves the desired goals. In this paper, we study the novel optimal observability problem OOP: Given a POMDP M, how should one change M's observation capabilities within a fixed budget such that its (minimal) expected reward remains below a given threshold? We show that the problem is undecidable in general and decidable when considering positional strategies only. We present two algorithms for a decidable fragment of the OOP: one based on optimal strategies of M's underlying Markov decision process and one based on parameter synthesis with SMT. We report promising results for variants of typical examples from the POMDP literature.
5/20/2024