Optimal Parallel Algorithms for Dendrogram Computation and Single-Linkage Clustering

Read original: arXiv:2404.19019 - Published 5/14/2024 by Laxman Dhulipala, Xiaojun Dong, Kishen N Gowda, Yan Gu
Total Score

0

🔗

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents faster parallel algorithms for computing Single-Linkage Dendrograms (SLDs), a key step in the classic single-linkage hierarchical clustering algorithm.
  • Existing algorithms for computing SLDs require $Omega(nlog n)$ work, where $n$ is the size of the input edge-weighted tree $T$.
  • The authors design new parallel algorithms that can compute SLDs faster both in theory and in practice, based on novel structural results about SLDs.

Plain English Explanation

Hierarchical clustering is a popular technique used to group similar data points into clusters. The single-linkage hierarchical clustering algorithm is one such method, and computing the Single-Linkage Dendrogram (SLD) is a key step in this algorithm.

An SLD is a binary tree-like diagram that summarizes the different ways the data points can be clustered together. Existing algorithms for computing SLDs are quite slow, requiring $Omega(nlog n)$ time, where $n$ is the number of data points.

In this paper, the authors develop new parallel algorithms that can compute SLDs much faster. Their algorithms are based on novel insights about the structure of SLDs, which allow them to be computed more efficiently. For example, one of their algorithms uses a divide-and-conquer approach inspired by Cartesian trees, while another is based on the nearest neighbor chain algorithm for hierarchical agglomerative clustering.

The authors show that their new algorithms can compute SLDs on very large datasets, with up to 150x speedup over the commonly used Union-Find algorithm. This makes it much easier and faster to perform hierarchical clustering on massive datasets, with potential applications in fields like bioinformatics, social network analysis, and more.

Technical Explanation

The authors' key technical contributions are:

  1. A deterministic, output-sensitive parallel algorithm for computing SLDs that requires $O(n log h)$ work and $O(log^2 n log^2 h)$ depth, where $h$ is the height of the output SLD. This algorithm is based on parallel tree contraction.

  2. A deterministic, bottom-up algorithm for computing SLDs that achieves $O(n log h)$ work and $O(h log n)$ depth. This algorithm is inspired by the nearest neighbor chain algorithm for hierarchical agglomerative clustering.

These new algorithms are made possible by a novel divide-and-conquer framework for building SLDs, which is inspired by divide-and-conquer algorithms for Cartesian trees. This framework allows the authors to exploit the structure of SLDs to compute them more efficiently than previous approaches.

The authors evaluate their algorithms both theoretically and empirically, showing that they can compute SLDs on billion-scale trees and achieve up to 150x speedup over the Union-Find algorithm typically used in practice. This represents a significant advancement in the state-of-the-art for computing SLDs, with potential impact on a variety of applications that rely on hierarchical clustering.

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a thorough analysis of their new algorithms, including formal proofs of their theoretical guarantees. They also demonstrate the practical performance of their approaches through extensive experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets.

One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses solely on the task of computing SLDs, and does not consider other types of hierarchical clustering, such as average-linkage or complete-linkage clustering. It would be interesting to see if the authors' techniques could be extended to these other clustering methods as well.

Additionally, while the authors show that their algorithms can scale to very large datasets, they do not explore the performance of their methods on datasets with specific challenging characteristics, such as high-dimensional or noisy data. Understanding the robustness of hierarchical clustering algorithms to such data properties is an important area for further research.

Overall, this paper presents a significant advance in the field of hierarchical clustering, with practical implications for a wide range of applications that rely on efficient and scalable clustering algorithms.

Conclusion

This paper introduces novel parallel algorithms for computing Single-Linkage Dendrograms (SLDs), a key step in the classic single-linkage hierarchical clustering algorithm. The authors' new algorithms, based on a divide-and-conquer framework inspired by Cartesian trees and the nearest neighbor chain algorithm, can compute SLDs much faster than existing approaches, both in theory and in practice.

These advances have important implications for a variety of applications that rely on hierarchical clustering, such as bioinformatics, social network analysis, and more. By enabling the efficient computation of SLDs on massive datasets, the authors' work paves the way for more scalable and versatile hierarchical clustering techniques that can unlock new insights and discoveries in data-driven fields.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔗

Total Score

0

Optimal Parallel Algorithms for Dendrogram Computation and Single-Linkage Clustering

Laxman Dhulipala, Xiaojun Dong, Kishen N Gowda, Yan Gu

Computing a Single-Linkage Dendrogram (SLD) is a key step in the classic single-linkage hierarchical clustering algorithm. Given an input edge-weighted tree $T$, the SLD of $T$ is a binary dendrogram that summarizes the $n-1$ clusterings obtained by contracting the edges of $T$ in order of weight. Existing algorithms for computing the SLD all require $Omega(nlog n)$ work where $n = |T|$. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge no prior work provides a parallel algorithm obtaining non-trivial speedup for this problem. In this paper, we design faster parallel algorithms for computing SLDs both in theory and in practice based on new structural results about SLDs. In particular, we obtain a deterministic output-sensitive parallel algorithm based on parallel tree contraction that requires $O(n log h)$ work and $O(log^2 n log^2 h)$ depth, where $h$ is the height of the output SLD. We also give a deterministic bottom-up algorithm for the problem inspired by the nearest-neighbor chain algorithm for hierarchical agglomerative clustering, and show that it achieves $O(nlog h)$ work and $O(h log n)$ depth. Our results are based on a novel divide-and-conquer framework for building SLDs, inspired by divide-and-conquer algorithms for Cartesian trees. Our new algorithms can quickly compute the SLD on billion-scale trees, and obtain up to 150x speedup over the highly-efficient Union-Find algorithm typically used to compute SLDs in practice.

Read more

5/14/2024

Total Score

0

A Surprisingly Simple Method for Distributed Euclidean-Minimum Spanning Tree / Single Linkage Dendrogram Construction from High Dimensional Embeddings via Distance Decomposition

Richard Lettich

We introduce a decomposition method for the distributed calculation of exact Euclidean Minimum Spanning Trees in high dimensions (where sub-quadratic algorithms are not effective), or more generalized geometric-minimum spanning trees of complete graphs, where for each vertex $vin V$ in the graph $G=(V,E)$ is represented by a vector in $vec{v}in mathbb{R}^n$, and each for any edge, the the weight of the edge in the graph is given by a symmetric binary `distance' function between the representative vectors $w({x,y}) = d(vec{x},vec{y})$. This is motivated by the task of clustering high dimensional embeddings produced by neural networks, where low-dimensional algorithms are ineffective; such geometric-minimum spanning trees find applications as a subroutine in the construction of single linkage dendrograms, as the two structures can be converted between each other efficiently.

Read more

6/5/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

It's Hard to HAC with Average Linkage!

MohammadHossein Bateni, Laxman Dhulipala, Kishen N Gowda, D Ellis Hershkowitz, Rajesh Jayaram, Jakub {L}k{a}cki

Average linkage Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (HAC) is an extensively studied and applied method for hierarchical clustering. Recent applications to massive datasets have driven significant interest in near-linear-time and efficient parallel algorithms for average linkage HAC. We provide hardness results that rule out such algorithms. On the sequential side, we establish a runtime lower bound of $n^{3/2-epsilon}$ on $n$ node graphs for sequential combinatorial algorithms under standard fine-grained complexity assumptions. This essentially matches the best-known running time for average linkage HAC. On the parallel side, we prove that average linkage HAC likely cannot be parallelized even on simple graphs by showing that it is CC-hard on trees of diameter $4$. On the possibility side, we demonstrate that average linkage HAC can be efficiently parallelized (i.e., it is in NC) on paths and can be solved in near-linear time when the height of the output cluster hierarchy is small.

Read more

4/24/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

New bounds on the cohesion of complete-link and other linkage methods for agglomeration clustering

Sanjoy Dasgupta, Eduardo Laber

Linkage methods are among the most popular algorithms for hierarchical clustering. Despite their relevance the current knowledge regarding the quality of the clustering produced by these methods is limited. Here, we improve the currently available bounds on the maximum diameter of the clustering obtained by complete-link for metric spaces. One of our new bounds, in contrast to the existing ones, allows us to separate complete-link from single-link in terms of approximation for the diameter, which corroborates the common perception that the former is more suitable than the latter when the goal is producing compact clusters. We also show that our techniques can be employed to derive upper bounds on the cohesion of a class of linkage methods that includes the quite popular average-link.

Read more

5/3/2024