It's Hard to HAC with Average Linkage!

Read original: arXiv:2404.14730 - Published 4/24/2024 by MohammadHossein Bateni, Laxman Dhulipala, Kishen N Gowda, D Ellis Hershkowitz, Rajesh Jayaram, Jakub {L}k{a}cki
Total Score

0

👁️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper discusses the limitations of efficient parallel algorithms for average linkage Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (HAC), a widely used hierarchical clustering method.
  • The authors provide hardness results that rule out near-linear-time and efficient parallel algorithms for average linkage HAC.
  • They establish a runtime lower bound for sequential combinatorial algorithms and prove that average linkage HAC is likely not parallelizable even on simple graphs.
  • The paper also demonstrates that average linkage HAC can be efficiently parallelized on paths and solved in near-linear time when the height of the output cluster hierarchy is small.

Plain English Explanation

Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (HAC) is a popular technique for grouping data points into clusters, where the clusters are organized in a hierarchical structure. One specific variant of HAC is called "average linkage," which determines the similarity between clusters based on the average distance between their members.

As datasets have become larger, there has been a growing interest in developing fast, efficient algorithms for average linkage HAC. The authors of this paper investigate the limits of what is possible in terms of near-linear-time and parallel algorithms for this problem.

The key findings are:

  1. Sequential Hardness: The authors show that any sequential combinatorial algorithm for average linkage HAC on n-node graphs will take at least $n^{3/2-\epsilon}$ time to run, which is close to the best-known runtime for the problem. This suggests that significant further speedups may be difficult to achieve.

  2. Parallel Hardness: The authors prove that average linkage HAC is unlikely to be parallelizable, even on relatively simple graph structures like trees of diameter 4. This means that it may be challenging to develop parallel algorithms that can significantly speed up the computation of average linkage HAC.

  3. Positive Results: However, the authors also identify some cases where average linkage HAC can be efficiently parallelized or solved in near-linear time. Specifically, they show that it can be parallelized on path graphs and solved efficiently when the height of the output cluster hierarchy is small.

These results provide important insights into the fundamental limits of algorithms for average linkage HAC, which could guide future research and development in this area. Understanding the hardness of a problem is a crucial step in identifying the most promising directions for algorithmic improvements.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the complexity of algorithms for average linkage Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (HAC), an extensively studied and widely applied method for hierarchical clustering.

On the sequential side, the authors establish a runtime lower bound of $n^{3/2-\epsilon}$ on n-node graphs for sequential combinatorial algorithms under standard fine-grained complexity assumptions. This essentially matches the best-known running time for average linkage HAC, suggesting that significant further speedups may be difficult to achieve.

On the parallel side, the authors prove that average linkage HAC is likely not parallelizable even on simple graphs. Specifically, they show that average linkage HAC is CC-hard on trees of diameter 4, meaning that it is unlikely to be in the complexity class NC (which corresponds to problems that can be solved efficiently in parallel).

However, the authors also identify some positive results. They demonstrate that average linkage HAC can be efficiently parallelized (i.e., it is in NC) on paths and can be solved in near-linear time when the height of the output cluster hierarchy is small.

These hardness results provide important insights into the fundamental limits of algorithms for average linkage HAC. Understanding the inherent complexity of a problem is a crucial step in identifying the most promising directions for algorithmic improvements, as illustrated by the authors' work on hierarchical position embedding, context-aware 3D Gaussian models, and other related topics.

Critical Analysis

The authors of this paper provide a thorough and rigorous analysis of the computational complexity of average linkage HAC, which is an important and widely used clustering algorithm. Their hardness results are technically sound and provide valuable insights into the limitations of developing fast, efficient algorithms for this problem.

One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses solely on the average linkage variant of HAC, and the results may not necessarily apply to other linkage methods, such as single linkage or complete linkage. It would be interesting to see if similar hardness results could be established for these other variants as well.

Additionally, the authors' positive results on parallelizing average linkage HAC on paths and solving it efficiently when the output hierarchy has small height are intriguing, but it's not entirely clear how common these favorable conditions might be in real-world applications. Further research could investigate the prevalence of such scenarios and explore ways to leverage these insights in practical settings.

The paper also does not delve into the performance of average linkage HAC on real-world datasets, which could be influenced by factors beyond just the theoretical complexity, such as the structure and properties of the data. Empirical evaluations comparing average linkage HAC to other clustering methods, as well as to distributed stochastic approximation techniques or Byzantine-robust aggregation, could provide a more holistic understanding of the algorithm's strengths and limitations.

Overall, this paper makes important contributions to the theoretical understanding of average linkage HAC and sets the stage for further research on improving the efficiency of hierarchical clustering algorithms, potentially drawing inspiration from techniques like multi-dimensional scaling.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the computational complexity of average linkage Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (HAC), a widely used hierarchical clustering method. The authors establish hardness results that rule out the possibility of near-linear-time and efficient parallel algorithms for this problem, suggesting fundamental limits on the speed-up that can be achieved.

However, the paper also identifies some positive results, demonstrating that average linkage HAC can be efficiently parallelized on path graphs and solved in near-linear time when the height of the output cluster hierarchy is small. These insights could guide future research and development in this area, as understanding the inherent complexity of a problem is a crucial step in identifying the most promising directions for algorithmic improvements.

Overall, this work contributes to our theoretical understanding of the limitations and possibilities for efficient algorithms in hierarchical clustering, which is an important field with numerous applications in data analysis and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👁️

Total Score

0

It's Hard to HAC with Average Linkage!

MohammadHossein Bateni, Laxman Dhulipala, Kishen N Gowda, D Ellis Hershkowitz, Rajesh Jayaram, Jakub {L}k{a}cki

Average linkage Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (HAC) is an extensively studied and applied method for hierarchical clustering. Recent applications to massive datasets have driven significant interest in near-linear-time and efficient parallel algorithms for average linkage HAC. We provide hardness results that rule out such algorithms. On the sequential side, we establish a runtime lower bound of $n^{3/2-epsilon}$ on $n$ node graphs for sequential combinatorial algorithms under standard fine-grained complexity assumptions. This essentially matches the best-known running time for average linkage HAC. On the parallel side, we prove that average linkage HAC likely cannot be parallelized even on simple graphs by showing that it is CC-hard on trees of diameter $4$. On the possibility side, we demonstrate that average linkage HAC can be efficiently parallelized (i.e., it is in NC) on paths and can be solved in near-linear time when the height of the output cluster hierarchy is small.

Read more

4/24/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

TeraHAC: Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering of Trillion-Edge Graphs

Laxman Dhulipala, Jason Lee, Jakub {L}k{a}cki, Vahab Mirrokni

We introduce TeraHAC, a $(1+epsilon)$-approximate hierarchical agglomerative clustering (HAC) algorithm which scales to trillion-edge graphs. Our algorithm is based on a new approach to computing $(1+epsilon)$-approximate HAC, which is a novel combination of the nearest-neighbor chain algorithm and the notion of $(1+epsilon)$-approximate HAC. Our approach allows us to partition the graph among multiple machines and make significant progress in computing the clustering within each partition before any communication with other partitions is needed. We evaluate TeraHAC on a number of real-world and synthetic graphs of up to 8 trillion edges. We show that TeraHAC requires over 100x fewer rounds compared to previously known approaches for computing HAC. It is up to 8.3x faster than SCC, the state-of-the-art distributed algorithm for hierarchical clustering, while achieving 1.16x higher quality. In fact, TeraHAC essentially retains the quality of the celebrated HAC algorithm while significantly improving the running time.

Read more

6/12/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

New bounds on the cohesion of complete-link and other linkage methods for agglomeration clustering

Sanjoy Dasgupta, Eduardo Laber

Linkage methods are among the most popular algorithms for hierarchical clustering. Despite their relevance the current knowledge regarding the quality of the clustering produced by these methods is limited. Here, we improve the currently available bounds on the maximum diameter of the clustering obtained by complete-link for metric spaces. One of our new bounds, in contrast to the existing ones, allows us to separate complete-link from single-link in terms of approximation for the diameter, which corroborates the common perception that the former is more suitable than the latter when the goal is producing compact clusters. We also show that our techniques can be employed to derive upper bounds on the cohesion of a class of linkage methods that includes the quite popular average-link.

Read more

5/3/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Optimal Parallel Algorithms for Dendrogram Computation and Single-Linkage Clustering

Laxman Dhulipala, Xiaojun Dong, Kishen N Gowda, Yan Gu

Computing a Single-Linkage Dendrogram (SLD) is a key step in the classic single-linkage hierarchical clustering algorithm. Given an input edge-weighted tree $T$, the SLD of $T$ is a binary dendrogram that summarizes the $n-1$ clusterings obtained by contracting the edges of $T$ in order of weight. Existing algorithms for computing the SLD all require $Omega(nlog n)$ work where $n = |T|$. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge no prior work provides a parallel algorithm obtaining non-trivial speedup for this problem. In this paper, we design faster parallel algorithms for computing SLDs both in theory and in practice based on new structural results about SLDs. In particular, we obtain a deterministic output-sensitive parallel algorithm based on parallel tree contraction that requires $O(n log h)$ work and $O(log^2 n log^2 h)$ depth, where $h$ is the height of the output SLD. We also give a deterministic bottom-up algorithm for the problem inspired by the nearest-neighbor chain algorithm for hierarchical agglomerative clustering, and show that it achieves $O(nlog h)$ work and $O(h log n)$ depth. Our results are based on a novel divide-and-conquer framework for building SLDs, inspired by divide-and-conquer algorithms for Cartesian trees. Our new algorithms can quickly compute the SLD on billion-scale trees, and obtain up to 150x speedup over the highly-efficient Union-Find algorithm typically used to compute SLDs in practice.

Read more

5/14/2024