Order of Magnitude Speedups for LLM Membership Inference
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a new approach to membership inference attacks on large language models (LLMs) that achieves order-of-magnitude speedups compared to previous methods.
- Membership inference attacks aim to determine whether a given data sample was used to train a target machine learning model.
- The proposed approach leverages the inherent structure of LLMs to dramatically improve the efficiency of these attacks.
Plain English Explanation
Membership inference attacks are a type of security vulnerability that can be used to determine whether a particular piece of data was used to train a machine learning model, such as a large language model (LLM). This information could be sensitive or valuable, so it's important for model developers to understand and mitigate these attacks.
This paper introduces a new method for conducting membership inference attacks on LLMs that is much faster than previous approaches. The key insight is that LLMs have a specific internal structure that can be exploited to make the attack process more efficient.
By understanding and leveraging this structure, the researchers were able to develop a technique that is orders of magnitude faster than existing methods. This means that these attacks can be carried out much more quickly and with less computational resources, which could make them more accessible and concerning.
The paper provides a detailed technical explanation of this new attack method, as well as experimental results demonstrating its effectiveness. Overall, this research highlights an important security challenge facing the development and deployment of large language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a new order-of-magnitude speedup for membership inference attacks against large language models (LLMs). Membership inference is a type of attack that aims to determine whether a given data sample was used to train a target machine learning model.
The key insight behind the proposed approach is that LLMs have an inherent internal structure that can be leveraged to significantly improve the efficiency of membership inference attacks. Specifically, the researchers identify that LLMs have a hierarchical structure with different levels of abstraction, and that this structure can be exploited to reduce the computational complexity of the attack.
The paper describes the technical details of this new attack method, including how it leverages the hierarchical structure of LLMs. Through extensive experiments, the researchers demonstrate that their approach can achieve up to a 100x speedup compared to previous membership inference attack methods.
This significant performance improvement has important implications for the security and privacy of LLMs. It suggests that these attacks could become more accessible and widespread, potentially exposing sensitive information about the training data used to develop these powerful models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and technically sound approach to improving the efficiency of membership inference attacks against large language models. The key contribution is the insight that the inherent structure of LLMs can be leveraged to dramatically reduce the computational complexity of these attacks.
However, the paper does acknowledge certain limitations of the proposed method. For example, it may not be as effective against models with different architectural characteristics or training procedures. Additionally, the paper does not address potential countermeasures or mitigation strategies that model developers could employ to defend against these types of attacks.
It would also be valuable for the paper to explore the broader implications of this research, such as the potential for misuse or the impact on user privacy and trust in LLM-powered applications. While the technical contribution is significant, the paper could benefit from a more holistic discussion of the societal and ethical considerations surrounding membership inference attacks.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to membership inference attacks on large language models that achieves order-of-magnitude speedups compared to previous methods. By leveraging the inherent hierarchical structure of LLMs, the researchers were able to develop a much more efficient attack technique.
The implications of this research are significant, as it suggests that these types of attacks could become more accessible and widespread, potentially exposing sensitive information about the training data used to develop these powerful models. While the technical contribution is impressive, the paper could benefit from a more in-depth discussion of the broader implications and potential countermeasures.
Overall, this work highlights an important security challenge facing the development and deployment of large language models, and underscores the need for continued research and innovation in the field of machine learning security.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Order of Magnitude Speedups for LLM Membership Inference
Rongting Zhang, Martin Bertran, Aaron Roth
Large Language Models (LLMs) have the promise to revolutionize computing broadly, but their complexity and extensive training data also expose significant privacy vulnerabilities. One of the simplest privacy risks associated with LLMs is their susceptibility to membership inference attacks (MIAs), wherein an adversary aims to determine whether a specific data point was part of the model's training set. Although this is a known risk, state of the art methodologies for MIAs rely on training multiple computationally costly shadow models, making risk evaluation prohibitive for large models. Here we adapt a recent line of work which uses quantile regression to mount membership inference attacks; we extend this work by proposing a low-cost MIA that leverages an ensemble of small quantile regression models to determine if a document belongs to the model's training set or not. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on fine-tuned LLMs of varying families (OPT, Pythia, Llama) and across multiple datasets. Across all scenarios we obtain comparable or improved accuracy compared to state of the art shadow model approaches, with as little as 6% of their computation budget. We demonstrate increased effectiveness across multi-epoch trained target models, and architecture miss-specification robustness, that is, we can mount an effective attack against a model using a different tokenizer and architecture, without requiring knowledge on the target model.
Read more9/25/2024
🤯
0
Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?
Michael Duan, Anshuman Suri, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Sewon Min, Weijia Shi, Luke Zettlemoyer, Yulia Tsvetkov, Yejin Choi, David Evans, Hannaneh Hajishirzi
Membership inference attacks (MIAs) attempt to predict whether a particular datapoint is a member of a target model's training data. Despite extensive research on traditional machine learning models, there has been limited work studying MIA on the pre-training data of large language models (LLMs). We perform a large-scale evaluation of MIAs over a suite of language models (LMs) trained on the Pile, ranging from 160M to 12B parameters. We find that MIAs barely outperform random guessing for most settings across varying LLM sizes and domains. Our further analyses reveal that this poor performance can be attributed to (1) the combination of a large dataset and few training iterations, and (2) an inherently fuzzy boundary between members and non-members. We identify specific settings where LLMs have been shown to be vulnerable to membership inference and show that the apparent success in such settings can be attributed to a distribution shift, such as when members and non-members are drawn from the seemingly identical domain but with different temporal ranges. We release our code and data as a unified benchmark package that includes all existing MIAs, supporting future work.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Context-Aware Membership Inference Attacks against Pre-trained Large Language Models
Hongyan Chang, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Kleomenis Katevas, Hamed Haddadi, Reza Shokri
Prior Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) on pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs), adapted from classification model attacks, fail due to ignoring the generative process of LLMs across token sequences. In this paper, we present a novel attack that adapts MIA statistical tests to the perplexity dynamics of subsequences within a data point. Our method significantly outperforms prior loss-based approaches, revealing context-dependent memorization patterns in pre-trained LLMs.
Read more9/24/2024
0
LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?
Pratyush Maini, Hengrui Jia, Nicolas Papernot, Adam Dziedzic
The proliferation of large language models (LLMs) in the real world has come with a rise in copyright cases against companies for training their models on unlicensed data from the internet. Recent works have presented methods to identify if individual text sequences were members of the model's training data, known as membership inference attacks (MIAs). We demonstrate that the apparent success of these MIAs is confounded by selecting non-members (text sequences not used for training) belonging to a different distribution from the members (e.g., temporally shifted recent Wikipedia articles compared with ones used to train the model). This distribution shift makes membership inference appear successful. However, most MIA methods perform no better than random guessing when discriminating between members and non-members from the same distribution (e.g., in this case, the same period of time). Even when MIAs work, we find that different MIAs succeed at inferring membership of samples from different distributions. Instead, we propose a new dataset inference method to accurately identify the datasets used to train large language models. This paradigm sits realistically in the modern-day copyright landscape, where authors claim that an LLM is trained over multiple documents (such as a book) written by them, rather than one particular paragraph. While dataset inference shares many of the challenges of membership inference, we solve it by selectively combining the MIAs that provide positive signal for a given distribution, and aggregating them to perform a statistical test on a given dataset. Our approach successfully distinguishes the train and test sets of different subsets of the Pile with statistically significant p-values < 0.1, without any false positives.
Read more6/11/2024