Organizational Selection of Innovation
0
🎲
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Organizations must choose a subset of possible innovation projects due to budgetary constraints
- Identifying the most promising projects is difficult and may benefit from involving multiple decision makers
- This paper presents a model to help organizations effectively aggregate the collective insights of multiple agents when selecting innovation projects
Plain English Explanation
When organizations have limited budgets, they must be selective about which innovation projects to pursue. Choosing the right projects is challenging, and getting input from multiple decision makers may help. This paper introduces a model to show how organizations can best combine the judgments of various agents to make better portfolio selection decisions.
The research finds that portfolio performance can vary widely. Delegating project evaluation to relevant experts makes sense in some cases, but in many situations, aggregating the rankings or approval votes of multiple agents leads to better results than relying on a single expert's assessment. This is especially true when organizations have tight budgets and can only select a few projects from many alternatives.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a model of organizational portfolio selection that explores how to most effectively aggregate the judgments of multiple decision makers. The authors show that portfolio performance can vary significantly based on the approach used to combine agents' inputs.
In some cases, delegating project evaluation to relevant experts makes sense, but the paper finds that in many settings, letting agents rank projects often outperforms alternative aggregation rules. This includes averaging agents' project scores as well as simply counting their approval votes.
The advantages of the ranking approach are most apparent when organizations have tight budgets and can only select a few projects from a larger set of alternatives. The paper also explores tradeoffs between diversity and stability in multi-agent decision-making.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable model and insights for organizations struggling to make effective innovation project portfolio decisions. However, the research is limited to relatively simple organizational structures and decision-making processes.
Further research could explore more complex, hierarchical decision dynamics or cloud-based portfolio optimization approaches. The authors also acknowledge that their findings may be sensitive to factors like the number of agents, their expertise, and the specific decision rules used.
Overall, the paper offers a solid foundation for thinking about collective decision-making for innovation portfolio management, but more work is needed to fully understand the nuances and generalize the findings to diverse organizational contexts.
Conclusion
This research provides a useful model for how organizations can effectively aggregate the judgments of multiple agents when selecting innovation projects under budgetary constraints. The key insight is that in many cases, letting agents rank projects directly often leads to better portfolio performance than alternative aggregation approaches.
While the findings are limited in scope, the paper offers a valuable starting point for organizations struggling with these types of decisions. Further research could build on this work to develop more sophisticated and adaptable portfolio selection frameworks that account for the complexities of real-world innovation management.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎲
0
Organizational Selection of Innovation
Lucas Bottcher, Ronald Klingebiel
Budgetary constraints force organizations to pursue only a subset of possible innovation projects. Identifying which subset is most promising is an error-prone exercise, and involving multiple decision makers may be prudent. This raises the question of how to most effectively aggregate their collective nous. Our model of organizational portfolio selection provides some first answers. We show that portfolio performance can vary widely. Delegating evaluation makes sense when organizations employ the relevant experts and can assign projects to them. In most other settings, aggregating the impressions of multiple agents leads to better performance than delegation. In particular, letting agents rank projects often outperforms alternative aggregation rules -- including averaging agents' project scores as well as counting their approval votes -- especially when organizations have tight budgets and can select only a few project alternatives out of many.
Read more5/20/2024
0
On Constructing Algorithm Portfolios in Algorithm Selection for Computationally Expensive Black-box Optimization in the Fixed-budget Setting
Takushi Yoshikawa, Ryoji Tanabe
Feature-based offline algorithm selection has shown its effectiveness in a wide range of optimization problems, including the black-box optimization problem. An algorithm selection system selects the most promising optimizer from an algorithm portfolio, which is a set of pre-defined optimizers. Thus, algorithm selection requires a well-constructed algorithm portfolio consisting of efficient optimizers complementary to each other. Although construction methods for the fixed-target setting have been well studied, those for the fixed-budget setting have received less attention. Here, the fixed-budget setting is generally used for computationally expensive optimization, where a budget of function evaluations is small. In this context, first, this paper points out some undesirable properties of experimental setups in previous studies. Then, this paper argues the importance of considering the number of function evaluations used in the sampling phase when constructing algorithm portfolios, whereas the previous studies ignored that. The results show that algorithm portfolios constructed by our approach perform significantly better than those by the previous approach.
Read more5/21/2024
0
Strategic Cost Selection in Participatory Budgeting
Piotr Faliszewski, {L}ukasz Janeczko, Andrzej Kaczmarczyk, Grzegorz Lisowski, Piotr Skowron, Stanis{l}aw Szufa
We study strategic behavior of project proposers in the context of approval-based participatory budgeting (PB). In our model we assume that the votes are fixed and known and the proposers want to set as high project prices as possible, provided that their projects get selected and the prices are not below the minimum costs of their delivery. We study the existence of pure Nash equilibria (NE) in such games, focusing on the AV/Cost, Phragm'en, and Method of Equal Shares rules. Furthermore, we report an experimental study of strategic cost selection on real-life PB election data.
Read more7/30/2024
0
Leveraging automatic strategy discovery to teach people how to select better projects
Lovis Heindrich, Falk Lieder
The decisions of individuals and organizations are often suboptimal because normative decision strategies are too demanding in the real world. Recent work suggests that some errors can be prevented by leveraging artificial intelligence to discover and teach prescriptive decision strategies that take people's constraints into account. So far, this line of research has been limited to simplified decision problems. This article is the first to extend this approach to a real-world decision problem, namely project selection. We develop a computational method (MGPS) that automatically discovers project selection strategies that are optimized for real people and develop an intelligent tutor that teaches the discovered strategies. We evaluated MGPS on a computational benchmark and tested the intelligent tutor in a training experiment with two control conditions. MGPS outperformed a state-of-the-art method and was more computationally efficient. Moreover, the intelligent tutor significantly improved people's decision strategies. Our results indicate that our method can improve human decision-making in naturalistic settings similar to real-world project selection, a first step towards applying strategy discovery to the real world.
Read more6/7/2024