On Constructing Algorithm Portfolios in Algorithm Selection for Computationally Expensive Black-box Optimization in the Fixed-budget Setting

Read original: arXiv:2405.10976 - Published 5/21/2024 by Takushi Yoshikawa, Ryoji Tanabe
Total Score

0

On Constructing Algorithm Portfolios in Algorithm Selection for Computationally Expensive Black-box Optimization in the Fixed-budget Setting

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses constructing algorithm portfolios for computationally expensive black-box optimization problems in a fixed-budget setting.
  • It explores using feature-based algorithm selection to choose the best algorithm from a portfolio to solve the optimization problem within a limited computational budget.
  • The research aims to improve the performance of algorithm selection for these types of challenging optimization problems.

Plain English Explanation

When trying to solve complex optimization problems, like designing a new product or finding the best investment strategy, there are often many different algorithms (mathematical procedures) that could be used. However, some of these algorithms can be very computationally expensive, meaning they require a lot of processing power and time to run.

The researchers in this paper looked at how to build a "portfolio" of different algorithms and then select the best one to use for a given optimization problem, all within a fixed computational budget. By analyzing the features of the problem, such as the shape of the search space or the number of variables involved, the system can pick the algorithm most likely to find a good solution quickly.

This approach could be useful in fields like engineering, finance, or materials science, where optimizing a design or process is crucial but the calculations involved are very complex and time-consuming. The feature-based algorithm selection technique allows researchers to get high-quality results without having to run every possible algorithm and waste valuable computing resources.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on algorithm selection for computationally expensive black-box optimization problems, where the objective function is complex and expensive to evaluate. In this fixed-budget setting, the goal is to select the best algorithm from a portfolio to solve the problem within a limited computational budget.

The key aspects of the technical approach include:

  1. Feature Extraction: The researchers extract a set of features from the optimization problem that characterize its structure and difficulty. These features are used to predict the performance of different algorithms.

  2. Algorithm Portfolio Construction: The paper explores how to build an effective portfolio of optimization algorithms, considering factors like algorithm performance, diversity, and complementarity.

  3. Algorithm Selection: A machine learning model is trained to map the problem features to the most suitable algorithm from the portfolio, given the computational budget constraints. The impact of training instance selection on the selection model is also investigated.

  4. Experimental Evaluation: The proposed approach is evaluated on a range of computationally expensive black-box optimization problems, comparing its performance to standard algorithm selection methods. The generalization analysis of algorithm features is also discussed.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed study that addresses an important challenge in the field of algorithm selection for computationally expensive optimization problems. The researchers have carefully considered the practical limitations of a fixed computational budget and the need for efficient algorithm selection.

One potential limitation of the approach is the reliance on accurate feature extraction and the availability of a representative set of training instances. The adaptive approach to Bayesian optimization may be an interesting avenue to explore, as it can handle the uncertainty in problem features and algorithm performance more effectively.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the impact of algorithm portfolio size and composition on the overall performance. Investigating the trade-offs between portfolio diversity, algorithm performance, and computational overhead could provide further insights.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach to algorithm selection for computationally expensive black-box optimization problems in a fixed-budget setting. By leveraging problem features and constructing an effective algorithm portfolio, the proposed method can select the most suitable algorithm to solve the optimization problem efficiently.

The research has important implications for fields where optimization is crucial but resources are limited, such as engineering, materials science, and finance. The feature-based algorithm selection technique could help researchers and practitioners find high-quality solutions without excessive computational cost, unlocking new opportunities for innovation and discovery.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

On Constructing Algorithm Portfolios in Algorithm Selection for Computationally Expensive Black-box Optimization in the Fixed-budget Setting
Total Score

0

On Constructing Algorithm Portfolios in Algorithm Selection for Computationally Expensive Black-box Optimization in the Fixed-budget Setting

Takushi Yoshikawa, Ryoji Tanabe

Feature-based offline algorithm selection has shown its effectiveness in a wide range of optimization problems, including the black-box optimization problem. An algorithm selection system selects the most promising optimizer from an algorithm portfolio, which is a set of pre-defined optimizers. Thus, algorithm selection requires a well-constructed algorithm portfolio consisting of efficient optimizers complementary to each other. Although construction methods for the fixed-target setting have been well studied, those for the fixed-budget setting have received less attention. Here, the fixed-budget setting is generally used for computationally expensive optimization, where a budget of function evaluations is small. In this context, first, this paper points out some undesirable properties of experimental setups in previous studies. Then, this paper argues the importance of considering the number of function evaluations used in the sampling phase when constructing algorithm portfolios, whereas the previous studies ignored that. The results show that algorithm portfolios constructed by our approach perform significantly better than those by the previous approach.

Read more

5/21/2024

A Survey of Meta-features Used for Automated Selection of Algorithms for Black-box Single-objective Continuous Optimization
Total Score

0

A Survey of Meta-features Used for Automated Selection of Algorithms for Black-box Single-objective Continuous Optimization

Gjorgjina Cenikj, Ana Nikolikj, Gav{s}per Petelin, Niki van Stein, Carola Doerr, Tome Eftimov

The selection of the most appropriate algorithm to solve a given problem instance, known as algorithm selection, is driven by the potential to capitalize on the complementary performance of different algorithms across sets of problem instances. However, determining the optimal algorithm for an unseen problem instance has been shown to be a challenging task, which has garnered significant attention from researchers in recent years. In this survey, we conduct an overview of the key contributions to algorithm selection in the field of single-objective continuous black-box optimization. We present ongoing work in representation learning of meta-features for optimization problem instances, algorithm instances, and their interactions. We also study machine learning models for automated algorithm selection, configuration, and performance prediction. Through this analysis, we identify gaps in the state of the art, based on which we present ideas for further development of meta-feature representations.

Read more

6/12/2024

Frugal Algorithm Selection
Total Score

0

Frugal Algorithm Selection

Erdem Kuc{s}, Ozgur Akgun, Nguyen Dang, Ian Miguel

When solving decision and optimisation problems, many competing algorithms (model and solver choices) have complementary strengths. Typically, there is no single algorithm that works well for all instances of a problem. Automated algorithm selection has been shown to work very well for choosing a suitable algorithm for a given instance. However, the cost of training can be prohibitively large due to running candidate algorithms on a representative set of training instances. In this work, we explore reducing this cost by choosing a subset of the training instances on which to train. We approach this problem in three ways: using active learning to decide based on prediction uncertainty, augmenting the algorithm predictors with a timeout predictor, and collecting training data using a progressively increasing timeout. We evaluate combinations of these approaches on six datasets from ASLib and present the reduction in labelling cost achieved by each option.

Read more

5/21/2024

🎲

Total Score

0

Organizational Selection of Innovation

Lucas Bottcher, Ronald Klingebiel

Budgetary constraints force organizations to pursue only a subset of possible innovation projects. Identifying which subset is most promising is an error-prone exercise, and involving multiple decision makers may be prudent. This raises the question of how to most effectively aggregate their collective nous. Our model of organizational portfolio selection provides some first answers. We show that portfolio performance can vary widely. Delegating evaluation makes sense when organizations employ the relevant experts and can assign projects to them. In most other settings, aggregating the impressions of multiple agents leads to better performance than delegation. In particular, letting agents rank projects often outperforms alternative aggregation rules -- including averaging agents' project scores as well as counting their approval votes -- especially when organizations have tight budgets and can select only a few project alternatives out of many.

Read more

5/20/2024