Outline of an Independent Systematic Blackbox Test for ML-based Systems
0
๐๏ธ
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new test procedure to independently verify the quality of machine learning (ML) models and ML-based systems, taking into account their "black box" nature and the inherent stochastic properties of ML models and their training data.
- The authors present initial results from their test experiments and suggest extensions to existing test methods to better reflect the stochastic nature of ML models and systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a method to test ML models and systems independently of the training process. Typical quality measures like accuracy and precision for these models are often based on the training process itself. However, ML models and the data used to train them have inherent randomness and uncertainty.
This new test procedure allows verifying the quality of ML models and systems without relying solely on the training process. It accounts for the "black box" nature of many ML models, where the internal workings are not fully transparent. The authors also propose ways to extend existing test methods to better capture the stochastic, probabilistic nature of ML [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/is-algorithmic-stability-testable-unified-framework-under].
By independently testing ML models and systems, the authors aim to provide more reliable and comprehensive quality assurance, beyond what can be gleaned from the training process alone [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/black-box-access-is-insufficient-rigorous-ai].
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a new test procedure designed to evaluate the quality of ML models and ML-based systems independently of the actual training process. This is important because typical quality measures like accuracy and precision are often tied directly to the training data and process, but ML models and their training data have inherent stochastic properties that can impact performance.
The authors conduct a series of test experiments to demonstrate their approach. They suggest extending existing test methods to better reflect the probabilistic nature of ML models and systems [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/analytical-results-uncertainty-propagation-through-trained-machine].
For example, the authors propose incorporating stochastic simulation techniques to account for the uncertainty in ML model outputs, rather than relying solely on point estimates. This can provide a more comprehensive assessment of model quality and behavior [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-language-model-confidence-estimation-via-black].
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge that their proposed test procedure is an initial step and requires further development and validation. Extending existing test methods to fully capture the stochastic properties of ML models and systems is a complex challenge that will likely require ongoing research and refinement.
One potential limitation is the ability to generalize the test procedure across diverse ML applications and domains. The authors' experiments focused on specific use cases, and further work may be needed to ensure the approach is widely applicable.
Additionally, the authors do not address the potential computational complexity and resource requirements of their proposed stochastic simulation techniques, which could be a practical concern for some real-world applications.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to independently testing the quality of ML models and ML-based systems, taking into account their "black box" nature and the inherent randomness of ML models and training data.
The authors' proposed test procedure and suggestions for extending existing test methods aim to provide more comprehensive and reliable quality assurance for ML systems, beyond what can be achieved through the training process alone.
While further research and validation are needed, this work represents an important step towards developing robust, transparent, and accountable ML systems that can be thoroughly evaluated and trusted.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
๐๏ธ
0
Outline of an Independent Systematic Blackbox Test for ML-based Systems
Hans-Werner Wiesbrock, Jurgen Gro{ss}mann
This article proposes a test procedure that can be used to test ML models and ML-based systems independently of the actual training process. In this way, the typical quality statements such as accuracy and precision of these models and system can be verified independently, taking into account their black box character and the immanent stochastic properties of ML models and their training data. The article presents first results from a set of test experiments and suggest extensions to existing test methods reflecting the stochastic nature of ML models and ML-based systems.
Read more6/21/2024
๐งช
0
An empirical study of testing machine learning in the wild
Moses Openja (Jack), Foutse Khomh (Jack), Armstrong Foundjem (Jack), Zhen Ming (Jack), Jiang, Mouna Abidi, Ahmed E. Hassan
Recently, machine and deep learning (ML/DL) algorithms have been increasingly adopted in many software systems. Due to their inductive nature, ensuring the quality of these systems remains a significant challenge for the research community. Unlike traditional software built deductively by writing explicit rules, ML/DL systems infer rules from training data. Recent research in ML/DL quality assurance has adapted concepts from traditional software testing, such as mutation testing, to improve reliability. However, it is unclear if these proposed testing techniques are adopted in practice, or if new testing strategies have emerged from real-world ML deployments. There is little empirical evidence about the testing strategies. To fill this gap, we perform the first fine-grained empirical study on ML testing in the wild to identify the ML properties being tested, the testing strategies, and their implementation throughout the ML workflow. We conducted a mixed-methods study to understand ML software testing practices. We analyzed test files and cases from 11 open-source ML/DL projects on GitHub. Using open coding, we manually examined the testing strategies, tested ML properties, and implemented testing methods to understand their practical application in building and releasing ML/DL software systems. Our findings reveal several key insights: 1.) The most common testing strategies, accounting for less than 40%, are Grey-box and White-box methods, such as Negative Testing, Oracle Approximation and Statistical Testing. 2.) A wide range of 17 ML properties are tested, out of which only 20% to 30% are frequently tested, including Consistency, Correctness}, and Efficiency. 3.) Bias and Fairness is more tested in Recommendation, while Security & Privacy is tested in Computer Vision (CV) systems, Application Platforms, and Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems.
Read more7/16/2024
๐
0
Using Quality Attribute Scenarios for ML Model Test Case Generation
Rachel Brower-Sinning, Grace A. Lewis, Sebast'ian Echeverr'ia, Ipek Ozkaya
Testing of machine learning (ML) models is a known challenge identified by researchers and practitioners alike. Unfortunately, current practice for ML model testing prioritizes testing for model performance, while often neglecting the requirements and constraints of the ML-enabled system that integrates the model. This limited view of testing leads to failures during integration, deployment, and operations, contributing to the difficulties of moving models from development to production. This paper presents an approach based on quality attribute (QA) scenarios to elicit and define system- and model-relevant test cases for ML models. The QA-based approach described in this paper has been integrated into MLTE, a process and tool to support ML model test and evaluation. Feedback from users of MLTE highlights its effectiveness in testing beyond model performance and identifying failures early in the development process.
Read more6/14/2024
0
Effective Black Box Testing of Sentiment Analysis Classification Networks
Parsa Karbasizadeh, Fathiyeh Faghih, Pouria Golshanrad
Transformer-based neural networks have demonstrated remarkable performance in natural language processing tasks such as sentiment analysis. Nevertheless, the issue of ensuring the dependability of these complicated architectures through comprehensive testing is still open. This paper presents a collection of coverage criteria specifically designed to assess test suites created for transformer-based sentiment analysis networks. Our approach utilizes input space partitioning, a black-box method, by considering emotionally relevant linguistic features such as verbs, adjectives, adverbs, and nouns. In order to effectively produce test cases that encompass a wide range of emotional elements, we utilize the k-projection coverage metric. This metric minimizes the complexity of the problem by examining subsets of k features at the same time, hence reducing dimensionality. Large language models are employed to generate sentences that display specific combinations of emotional features. The findings from experiments obtained from a sentiment analysis dataset illustrate that our criteria and generated tests have led to an average increase of 16% in test coverage. In addition, there is a corresponding average decrease of 6.5% in model accuracy, showing the ability to identify vulnerabilities. Our work provides a foundation for improving the dependability of transformer-based sentiment analysis systems through comprehensive test evaluation.
Read more7/31/2024