On the Parameter Identifiability of Partially Observed Linear Causal Models

Read original: arXiv:2407.16975 - Published 7/25/2024 by Xinshuai Dong, Ignavier Ng, Biwei Huang, Yuewen Sun, Songyao Jin, Roberto Legaspi, Peter Spirtes, Kun Zhang
Total Score

0

On the Parameter Identifiability of Partially Observed Linear Causal Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper analyzes the parameter identifiability of partially observed linear causal models.
  • It explores the conditions under which the causal parameters can be uniquely determined from the observed data.
  • The findings have implications for causal inference and learning in settings with latent variables.

Plain English Explanation

In the real world, we often don't have access to all the relevant information to understand the causal relationships between different factors. There may be hidden or unobserved variables that influence the relationships we can observe. This paper examines how well we can still infer the strengths of causal connections when we're missing some of the data.

The researchers looked at linear causal models, where the relationships between variables are assumed to be straight-line relationships. They considered situations where some of the variables are not directly measured or observed. The key question they investigated is: under what conditions can we still uniquely determine the strengths of the causal connections, even when we're missing some of the information?

Their analysis provides insights into the challenges of causal inference when dealing with incomplete data. Understanding these limitations is important for applications like healthcare, economics, and social science, where researchers often have to work with partially observed data to study causal relationships.

Technical Explanation

The paper examines the parameter identifiability of linear causal models when some of the variables are unobserved. Specifically, they consider a class of partially observed linear structural equation models (PO-LSEMs), where a subset of the variables are latent (unobserved).

The key technical results are:

  1. They provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the model parameters to be globally identifiable from the observed covariance matrix. This involves analyzing the rank and positive definiteness of certain matrices derived from the model structure.

  2. They show that in general, the causal parameters are not identifiable, but they identify a subclass of PO-LSEMs where the parameters are identifiable. This subclass includes models where the observed variables are causally sufficient (no latent confounders).

  3. They also characterize the partial identifiability of the causal parameters when full identifiability is not possible, providing bounds on the possible parameter values.

These results advance the theoretical understanding of causal inference with latent variables and have implications for causal representation learning in partially observed settings.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis of parameter identifiability in partially observed linear causal models. The conditions they derive for identifiability are fairly general and apply to a broad class of models.

One potential limitation is that the analysis is restricted to linear models. While linear relationships are common, many real-world causal processes involve nonlinear dynamics that are not captured by this framework. Extending the results to nonlinear causal models is an important direction for future research.

Additionally, the paper focuses on identifiability from the observed covariance matrix, which may be a strong assumption in some applications. Relaxing this assumption and considering other statistical estimands could further broaden the applicability of the results.

Overall, this is a technically sophisticated paper that makes valuable contributions to the theory of causal inference with latent variables. The insights it provides can inform the development of more robust causal learning algorithms for partially observed settings.

Conclusion

This paper advances the understanding of parameter identifiability in partially observed linear causal models. It characterizes the conditions under which the causal parameters can be uniquely determined from the observed data, as well as the extent of partial identifiability when full identifiability is not possible.

These results have important implications for causal inference and representation learning in a wide range of applications, from healthcare to economics, where researchers often have to contend with incomplete information about the underlying causal mechanisms. By shedding light on the theoretical limits of causal discovery in such settings, this work can guide the development of more effective causal modeling techniques.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

On the Parameter Identifiability of Partially Observed Linear Causal Models
Total Score

0

On the Parameter Identifiability of Partially Observed Linear Causal Models

Xinshuai Dong, Ignavier Ng, Biwei Huang, Yuewen Sun, Songyao Jin, Roberto Legaspi, Peter Spirtes, Kun Zhang

Linear causal models are important tools for modeling causal dependencies and yet in practice, only a subset of the variables can be observed. In this paper, we examine the parameter identifiability of these models by investigating whether the edge coefficients can be recovered given the causal structure and partially observed data. Our setting is more general than that of prior research - we allow all variables, including both observed and latent ones, to be flexibly related, and we consider the coefficients of all edges, whereas most existing works focus only on the edges between observed variables. Theoretically, we identify three types of indeterminacy for the parameters in partially observed linear causal models. We then provide graphical conditions that are sufficient for all parameters to be identifiable and show that some of them are provably necessary. Methodologically, we propose a novel likelihood-based parameter estimation method that addresses the variance indeterminacy of latent variables in a specific way and can asymptotically recover the underlying parameters up to trivial indeterminacy. Empirical studies on both synthetic and real-world datasets validate our identifiability theory and the effectiveness of the proposed method in the finite-sample regime.

Read more

7/25/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

On the Complexity of Identification in Linear Structural Causal Models

Julian Dorfler, Benito van der Zander, Markus Blaser, Maciej Liskiewicz

Learning the unknown causal parameters of a linear structural causal model is a fundamental task in causal analysis. The task, known as the problem of identification, asks to estimate the parameters of the model from a combination of assumptions on the graphical structure of the model and observational data, represented as a non-causal covariance matrix. In this paper, we give a new sound and complete algorithm for generic identification which runs in polynomial space. By standard simulation results, this algorithm has exponential running time which vastly improves the state-of-the-art double exponential time method using a Grobner basis approach. The paper also presents evidence that parameter identification is computationally hard in general. In particular, we prove, that the task asking whether, for a given feasible correlation matrix, there are exactly one or two or more parameter sets explaining the observed matrix, is hard for $forall R$, the co-class of the existential theory of the reals. In particular, this problem is $coNP$-hard. To our best knowledge, this is the first hardness result for some notion of identifiability.

Read more

7/18/2024

🏋️

Total Score

0

Causal Discovery in Linear Models with Unobserved Variables and Measurement Error

Yuqin Yang, Mohamed Nafea, Negar Kiyavash, Kun Zhang, AmirEmad Ghassami

The presence of unobserved common causes and the presence of measurement error are two of the most limiting challenges in the task of causal structure learning. Ignoring either of the two challenges can lead to detecting spurious causal links among variables of interest. In this paper, we study the problem of causal discovery in systems where these two challenges can be present simultaneously. We consider linear models which include four types of variables: variables that are directly observed, variables that are not directly observed but are measured with error, the corresponding measurements, and variables that are neither observed nor measured. We characterize the extent of identifiability of such model under separability condition (i.e., the matrix indicating the independent exogenous noise terms pertaining to the observed variables is identifiable) together with two versions of faithfulness assumptions and propose a notion of observational equivalence. We provide graphical characterization of the models that are equivalent and present a recovery algorithm that could return models equivalent to the ground truth.

Read more

7/30/2024

A Sparsity Principle for Partially Observable Causal Representation Learning
Total Score

0

A Sparsity Principle for Partially Observable Causal Representation Learning

Danru Xu, Dingling Yao, S'ebastien Lachapelle, Perouz Taslakian, Julius von Kugelgen, Francesco Locatello, Sara Magliacane

Causal representation learning aims at identifying high-level causal variables from perceptual data. Most methods assume that all latent causal variables are captured in the high-dimensional observations. We instead consider a partially observed setting, in which each measurement only provides information about a subset of the underlying causal state. Prior work has studied this setting with multiple domains or views, each depending on a fixed subset of latents. Here, we focus on learning from unpaired observations from a dataset with an instance-dependent partial observability pattern. Our main contribution is to establish two identifiability results for this setting: one for linear mixing functions without parametric assumptions on the underlying causal model, and one for piecewise linear mixing functions with Gaussian latent causal variables. Based on these insights, we propose two methods for estimating the underlying causal variables by enforcing sparsity in the inferred representation. Experiments on different simulated datasets and established benchmarks highlight the effectiveness of our approach in recovering the ground-truth latents.

Read more

6/18/2024