Causal Discovery in Linear Models with Unobserved Variables and Measurement Error
0
🏋️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper discusses causal discovery in linear models with unobserved variables and measurement error.
- It presents a method for identifying causal structures in such complex settings.
- The approach leverages observational data to infer causal relationships between variables.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you have a set of factors that might be related, but you can't directly observe some of them. For example, you may want to understand how people's incomes, education levels, and health are connected, but you can't directly measure their true incomes or education levels - you only have noisy estimates.
The paper proposes a way to uncover the underlying causal relationships between these factors, even with some missing information. The key is to look at the statistical patterns in the observed data to infer the hidden causal structure.
This is a challenging problem, but the researchers developed a mathematical framework and algorithms to tackle it. Their approach allows you to discover the causal model - i.e., which factors are causes, effects, or unrelated - even when you can't directly measure all the relevant variables.
Technical Explanation
The paper considers a linear causal model with unobserved latent variables and measurement error in the observed variables. The model represents the causal relationships between the variables through a set of linear structural equations.
The key technical contributions are:
- Establishing conditions under which the causal structure of this model is identifiable from observational data.
- Developing a practical algorithm to estimate the causal structure from data.
The algorithm works by leveraging the statistical patterns in the covariance structure of the observed variables to infer the underlying causal relationships, even in the presence of latent confounders and measurement error.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical and algorithmic framework for causal discovery in complex settings involving unobserved variables and noisy measurements. This is an important and challenging problem in many real-world applications.
One potential limitation is that the method assumes linearity of the causal relationships. While this is a common assumption, it may not hold in all cases. Further research could explore extensions to nonlinear causal models.
Additionally, the paper focuses on establishing identifiability conditions and developing estimation algorithms, but does not provide detailed empirical evaluations on real-world datasets. More extensive validation of the method's practical performance would be valuable.
Conclusion
This paper makes significant advances in causal discovery for linear models with unobserved variables and measurement error. The proposed framework and algorithms provide a principled way to infer causal structures from observational data in these complex settings. The insights from this work could have important implications for fields like economics, social sciences, and healthcare, where understanding causal relationships is crucial but unobserved factors and noisy measurements are common challenges.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏋️
0
Causal Discovery in Linear Models with Unobserved Variables and Measurement Error
Yuqin Yang, Mohamed Nafea, Negar Kiyavash, Kun Zhang, AmirEmad Ghassami
The presence of unobserved common causes and the presence of measurement error are two of the most limiting challenges in the task of causal structure learning. Ignoring either of the two challenges can lead to detecting spurious causal links among variables of interest. In this paper, we study the problem of causal discovery in systems where these two challenges can be present simultaneously. We consider linear models which include four types of variables: variables that are directly observed, variables that are not directly observed but are measured with error, the corresponding measurements, and variables that are neither observed nor measured. We characterize the extent of identifiability of such model under separability condition (i.e., the matrix indicating the independent exogenous noise terms pertaining to the observed variables is identifiable) together with two versions of faithfulness assumptions and propose a notion of observational equivalence. We provide graphical characterization of the models that are equivalent and present a recovery algorithm that could return models equivalent to the ground truth.
Read more7/30/2024
0
Causal Discovery of Linear Non-Gaussian Causal Models with Unobserved Confounding
Daniela Schkoda, Elina Robeva, Mathias Drton
We consider linear non-Gaussian structural equation models that involve latent confounding. In this setting, the causal structure is identifiable, but, in general, it is not possible to identify the specific causal effects. Instead, a finite number of different causal effects result in the same observational distribution. Most existing algorithms for identifying these causal effects use overcomplete independent component analysis (ICA), which often suffers from convergence to local optima. Furthermore, the number of latent variables must be known a priori. To address these issues, we propose an algorithm that operates recursively rather than using overcomplete ICA. The algorithm first infers a source, estimates the effect of the source and its latent parents on their descendants, and then eliminates their influence from the data. For both source identification and effect size estimation, we use rank conditions on matrices formed from higher-order cumulants. We prove asymptotic correctness under the mild assumption that locally, the number of latent variables never exceeds the number of observed variables. Simulation studies demonstrate that our method achieves comparable performance to overcomplete ICA even though it does not know the number of latents in advance.
Read more8/12/2024
0
On the Parameter Identifiability of Partially Observed Linear Causal Models
Xinshuai Dong, Ignavier Ng, Biwei Huang, Yuewen Sun, Songyao Jin, Roberto Legaspi, Peter Spirtes, Kun Zhang
Linear causal models are important tools for modeling causal dependencies and yet in practice, only a subset of the variables can be observed. In this paper, we examine the parameter identifiability of these models by investigating whether the edge coefficients can be recovered given the causal structure and partially observed data. Our setting is more general than that of prior research - we allow all variables, including both observed and latent ones, to be flexibly related, and we consider the coefficients of all edges, whereas most existing works focus only on the edges between observed variables. Theoretically, we identify three types of indeterminacy for the parameters in partially observed linear causal models. We then provide graphical conditions that are sufficient for all parameters to be identifiable and show that some of them are provably necessary. Methodologically, we propose a novel likelihood-based parameter estimation method that addresses the variance indeterminacy of latent variables in a specific way and can asymptotically recover the underlying parameters up to trivial indeterminacy. Empirical studies on both synthetic and real-world datasets validate our identifiability theory and the effectiveness of the proposed method in the finite-sample regime.
Read more7/25/2024
🤷
0
Sample, estimate, aggregate: A recipe for causal discovery foundation models
Menghua Wu, Yujia Bao, Regina Barzilay, Tommi Jaakkola
Causal discovery, the task of inferring causal structure from data, promises to accelerate scientific research, inform policy making, and more. However, causal discovery algorithms over larger sets of variables tend to be brittle against misspecification or when data are limited. To mitigate these challenges, we train a supervised model that learns to predict a larger causal graph from the outputs of classical causal discovery algorithms run over subsets of variables, along with other statistical hints like inverse covariance. Our approach is enabled by the observation that typical errors in the outputs of classical methods remain comparable across datasets. Theoretically, we show that this model is well-specified, in the sense that it can recover a causal graph consistent with graphs over subsets. Empirically, we train the model to be robust to erroneous estimates using diverse synthetic data. Experiments on real and synthetic data demonstrate that this model maintains high accuracy in the face of misspecification or distribution shift, and can be adapted at low cost to different discovery algorithms or choice of statistics.
Read more5/24/2024