The Perception-Robustness Tradeoff in Deterministic Image Restoration

Read original: arXiv:2311.09253 - Published 6/11/2024 by Guy Ohayon, Tomer Michaeli, Michael Elad

🖼️

Overview

This paper examines the behavior of deterministic methods for solving inverse problems in imaging, such as single image super-resolution.
The authors prove that as these methods get better at achieving high perceptual quality and consistency with measurements, their susceptibility to adversarial attacks also increases.
The paper demonstrates this tradeoff on single image super-resolution algorithms and shows how it can be leveraged to explore the posterior distribution, allowing deterministic models to imitate stochastic methods.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a class of image processing techniques known as deterministic methods for solving inverse problems. These methods are designed to achieve two main goals: 1) producing high-quality, visually appealing images, and 2) ensuring that the reconstructed images are consistent with the original measurements or data.

The authors of the paper prove that as these methods get better at achieving these two goals, they become more susceptible to adversarial attacks. In other words, small, carefully crafted changes to the input can cause the model to produce completely different outputs, even though the changes may be imperceptible to the human eye.

The paper demonstrates this tradeoff using single image super-resolution algorithms, which aim to take a low-resolution image and generate a higher-resolution version. The authors show that as these algorithms get better at producing visually pleasing and consistent results, they also become more vulnerable to adversarial attacks.

Interestingly, the authors also suggest that this undesirable behavior can be leveraged to explore the posterior distribution of the model, allowing deterministic models to imitate the behavior of stochastic methods, which are typically more robust to adversarial attacks.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a rigorous mathematical proof that as deterministic methods for solving inverse problems in imaging (such as single image super-resolution) get better at achieving high perceptual quality and consistency with measurements, their Lipschitz constant (a measure of sensitivity to small changes in the input) must grow to infinity.

This implies that such methods are necessarily more susceptible to adversarial attacks, where small, carefully crafted changes to the input can cause the model to produce dramatically different outputs.

The authors demonstrate this tradeoff on single image super-resolution algorithms, addressing both noisy and noiseless settings. They show that as these algorithms improve their perceptual quality and measurement consistency, their vulnerability to adversarial attacks also increases.

Furthermore, the authors reveal that this undesirable behavior can be leveraged to explore the posterior distribution of the model, allowing deterministic methods to imitate the behavior of stochastic techniques, which are typically more robust to adversarial attacks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the fundamental tradeoffs involved in designing deterministic methods for solving inverse problems in imaging. The authors' proof is well-constructed and convincingly demonstrates the inherent tension between achieving high perceptual quality, measurement consistency, and adversarial robustness.

One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses solely on deterministic methods and does not explore the behavior of stochastic methods, such as diffusion models, which may exhibit different tradeoffs. Additionally, the paper does not address the broader implications of this tradeoff for the development and deployment of image processing systems in real-world applications.

It would be interesting to see the authors further investigate the practical implications of their findings, particularly in the context of adversarial robustness and the potential to leverage the demonstrated behavior to improve the performance of deterministic models. Exploring the connections between this work and other emerging techniques, such as blind JPEG denoising, could also yield valuable insights.

Conclusion

This paper presents a thought-provoking analysis of the fundamental tradeoffs involved in designing deterministic methods for solving inverse problems in imaging. The authors' rigorous proof demonstrates that as these methods become better at achieving high perceptual quality and measurement consistency, they also become more susceptible to adversarial attacks.

This finding has significant implications for the development and deployment of image processing systems, particularly in applications where robustness and reliability are critical. The paper also suggests intriguing possibilities for leveraging the observed behavior to improve the performance of deterministic models, potentially by exploring the posterior distribution in a manner that imitates stochastic techniques.

Overall, this research provides valuable insights that can inform the design of future image processing algorithms and contribute to the ongoing effort to build more robust and reliable computer vision systems.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🖼️

The Perception-Robustness Tradeoff in Deterministic Image Restoration

Guy Ohayon, Tomer Michaeli, Michael Elad

We study the behavior of deterministic methods for solving inverse problems in imaging. These methods are commonly designed to achieve two goals: (1) attaining high perceptual quality, and (2) generating reconstructions that are consistent with the measurements. We provide a rigorous proof that the better a predictor satisfies these two requirements, the larger its Lipschitz constant must be, regardless of the nature of the degradation involved. In particular, to approach perfect perceptual quality and perfect consistency, the Lipschitz constant of the model must grow to infinity. This implies that such methods are necessarily more susceptible to adversarial attacks. We demonstrate our theory on single image super-resolution algorithms, addressing both noisy and noiseless settings. We also show how this undesired behavior can be leveraged to explore the posterior distribution, thereby allowing the deterministic model to imitate stochastic methods.

6/11/2024

🛠️

DiracDiffusion: Denoising and Incremental Reconstruction with Assured Data-Consistency

Zalan Fabian, Berk Tinaz, Mahdi Soltanolkotabi

Diffusion models have established new state of the art in a multitude of computer vision tasks, including image restoration. Diffusion-based inverse problem solvers generate reconstructions of exceptional visual quality from heavily corrupted measurements. However, in what is widely known as the perception-distortion trade-off, the price of perceptually appealing reconstructions is often paid in declined distortion metrics, such as PSNR. Distortion metrics measure faithfulness to the observation, a crucial requirement in inverse problems. In this work, we propose a novel framework for inverse problem solving, namely we assume that the observation comes from a stochastic degradation process that gradually degrades and noises the original clean image. We learn to reverse the degradation process in order to recover the clean image. Our technique maintains consistency with the original measurement throughout the reverse process, and allows for great flexibility in trading off perceptual quality for improved distortion metrics and sampling speedup via early-stopping. We demonstrate the efficiency of our method on different high-resolution datasets and inverse problems, achieving great improvements over other state-of-the-art diffusion-based methods with respect to both perceptual and distortion metrics.

8/21/2024

Looks Too Good To Be True: An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Hallucinations in Generative Restoration Models

Regev Cohen, Idan Kligvasser, Ehud Rivlin, Daniel Freedman

The pursuit of high perceptual quality in image restoration has driven the development of revolutionary generative models, capable of producing results often visually indistinguishable from real data. However, as their perceptual quality continues to improve, these models also exhibit a growing tendency to generate hallucinations - realistic-looking details that do not exist in the ground truth images. The presence of hallucinations introduces uncertainty regarding the reliability of the models' predictions, raising major concerns about their practical application. In this paper, we employ information-theory tools to investigate this phenomenon, revealing a fundamental tradeoff between uncertainty and perception. We rigorously analyze the relationship between these two factors, proving that the global minimal uncertainty in generative models grows in tandem with perception. In particular, we define the inherent uncertainty of the restoration problem and show that attaining perfect perceptual quality entails at least twice this uncertainty. Additionally, we establish a relation between mean squared-error distortion, uncertainty and perception, through which we prove the aforementioned uncertainly-perception tradeoff induces the well-known perception-distortion tradeoff. This work uncovers fundamental limitations of generative models in achieving both high perceptual quality and reliable predictions for image restoration. We demonstrate our theoretical findings through an analysis of single image super-resolution algorithms. Our work aims to raise awareness among practitioners about this inherent tradeoff, empowering them to make informed decisions and potentially prioritize safety over perceptual performance.

6/5/2024

Perceptual-Distortion Balanced Image Super-Resolution is a Multi-Objective Optimization Problem

Qiwen Zhu, Yanjie Wang, Shilv Cai, Liqun Chen, Jiahuan Zhou, Luxin Yan, Sheng Zhong, Xu Zou

Training Single-Image Super-Resolution (SISR) models using pixel-based regression losses can achieve high distortion metrics scores (e.g., PSNR and SSIM), but often results in blurry images due to insufficient recovery of high-frequency details. Conversely, using GAN or perceptual losses can produce sharp images with high perceptual metric scores (e.g., LPIPS), but may introduce artifacts and incorrect textures. Balancing these two types of losses can help achieve a trade-off between distortion and perception, but the challenge lies in tuning the loss function weights. To address this issue, we propose a novel method that incorporates Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) into the training process of SISR models to balance perceptual quality and distortion. We conceptualize the relationship between loss weights and image quality assessment (IQA) metrics as black-box objective functions to be optimized within our Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization Super-Resolution (MOBOSR) framework. This approach automates the hyperparameter tuning process, reduces overall computational cost, and enables the use of numerous loss functions simultaneously. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MOBOSR outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of both perceptual quality and distortion, significantly advancing the perception-distortion Pareto frontier. Our work points towards a new direction for future research on balancing perceptual quality and fidelity in nearly all image restoration tasks. The source code and pretrained models are available at: https://github.com/ZhuKeven/MOBOSR.

9/6/2024