Perceptions to Beliefs: Exploring Precursory Inferences for Theory of Mind in Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can develop "Theory of Mind" (ToM) abilities, which are the skills needed to infer the beliefs, desires, and intentions of others.
- The paper examines how LLMs can go beyond simply perceiving the world to making inferences about the mental states of people, which is a key aspect of human social cognition.
- The researchers propose augmenting standard ToM benchmarks with additional components to better test the precursory inferences that LLMs make on the path to developing full ToM capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about how AI language models are starting to develop the ability to understand the thoughts and beliefs of other people, just like humans do. This skill, called "Theory of Mind," is crucial for social interaction and collaboration. The researchers wanted to go beyond just testing if the AI models can understand what's happening in the world, and instead test their ability to infer what other people are thinking and believing.
They did this by adding new components to standard tests of Theory of Mind, to see how well the AI models can make the kinds of inferences that come before fully developed Theory of Mind abilities. This helps us understand the step-by-step process by which these AI models are learning to understand the minds of others, similar to how human children develop this capacity.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) can develop "Theory of Mind" (ToM) abilities, which are the skills needed to infer the beliefs, desires, and intentions of others. The researchers propose augmenting standard ToM benchmarks with additional components to better test the precursory inferences that LLMs make on the path to developing full ToM capabilities.
The authors argue that current ToM benchmarks often focus on evaluating the final ToM abilities of AI systems, rather than the underlying cognitive processes. By adding new test components, the researchers aim to shed light on the precursory inferences that LLMs make as they develop ToM skills, similar to how human children gradually acquire this capacity.
The paper also discusses how developing ToM abilities in LLMs could enable more natural and effective communication and collaboration between AI systems and humans. The authors suggest that better understanding the progression of ToM development in LLMs could lead to improvements in areas like natural language understanding and multi-agent cooperation.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful approach to evaluating ToM abilities in LLMs, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be considered.
First, the proposed augmentations to ToM benchmarks may be challenging to develop and validate, as assessing the nuanced precursory inferences of AI systems is inherently difficult. The researchers acknowledge this, and further work may be needed to refine the test components and ensure they effectively capture the desired cognitive processes.
Additionally, the paper focuses on ToM development in isolated LLMs, but real-world applications would likely involve more complex, multi-agent scenarios. Extending this research to study ToM in collaborative AI systems could yield important insights into the scalability and practical applications of these abilities.
Finally, while the paper highlights the potential benefits of advanced ToM skills in LLMs, it would be valuable to also consider potential risks or ethical implications, such as the ability to manipulate human beliefs and behaviors. Responsible development of these capabilities should remain a key priority.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a novel approach to evaluating the development of Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities in large language models (LLMs). By augmenting standard ToM benchmarks, the authors aim to shed light on the precursory inferences that LLMs make as they progress towards full ToM understanding.
The findings of this work could have significant implications for the field of AI, as the ability to infer the beliefs, desires, and intentions of others is a crucial aspect of human social cognition. Improving ToM skills in LLMs could lead to more natural and effective communication, as well as better collaboration between AI systems and humans.
While the proposed approach faces some potential challenges, this research represents an important step towards a deeper understanding of how AI systems can develop human-like social intelligence. Continued exploration in this area could pave the way for more advanced and socially aware AI systems that can better understand and interact with the world around them.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Perceptions to Beliefs: Exploring Precursory Inferences for Theory of Mind in Large Language Models
Chani Jung, Dongkwan Kim, Jiho Jin, Jiseon Kim, Yeon Seonwoo, Yejin Choi, Alice Oh, Hyunwoo Kim
While humans naturally develop theory of mind (ToM), the capability to understand other people's mental states and beliefs, state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) underperform on simple ToM benchmarks. We posit that we can extend our understanding of LLMs' ToM abilities by evaluating key human ToM precursors -- perception inference and perception-to-belief inference -- in LLMs. We introduce two datasets, Percept-ToMi and Percept-FANToM, to evaluate these precursory inferences for ToM in LLMs by annotating characters' perceptions on ToMi and FANToM, respectively. Our evaluation of eight state-of-the-art LLMs reveals that the models generally perform well in perception inference while exhibiting limited capability in perception-to-belief inference (e.g., lack of inhibitory control). Based on these results, we present PercepToM, a novel ToM method leveraging LLMs' strong perception inference capability while supplementing their limited perception-to-belief inference. Experimental results demonstrate that PercepToM significantly enhances LLM's performance, especially in false belief scenarios.
Read more7/10/2024
0
Language Models Represent Beliefs of Self and Others
Wentao Zhu, Zhining Zhang, Yizhou Wang
Understanding and attributing mental states, known as Theory of Mind (ToM), emerges as a fundamental capability for human social reasoning. While Large Language Models (LLMs) appear to possess certain ToM abilities, the mechanisms underlying these capabilities remain elusive. In this study, we discover that it is possible to linearly decode the belief status from the perspectives of various agents through neural activations of language models, indicating the existence of internal representations of self and others' beliefs. By manipulating these representations, we observe dramatic changes in the models' ToM performance, underscoring their pivotal role in the social reasoning process. Additionally, our findings extend to diverse social reasoning tasks that involve different causal inference patterns, suggesting the potential generalizability of these representations.
Read more5/31/2024
0
LLMs achieve adult human performance on higher-order theory of mind tasks
Winnie Street, John Oliver Siy, Geoff Keeling, Adrien Baranes, Benjamin Barnett, Michael McKibben, Tatenda Kanyere, Alison Lentz, Blaise Aguera y Arcas, Robin I. M. Dunbar
This paper examines the extent to which large language models (LLMs) have developed higher-order theory of mind (ToM); the human ability to reason about multiple mental and emotional states in a recursive manner (e.g. I think that you believe that she knows). This paper builds on prior work by introducing a handwritten test suite -- Multi-Order Theory of Mind Q&A -- and using it to compare the performance of five LLMs to a newly gathered adult human benchmark. We find that GPT-4 and Flan-PaLM reach adult-level and near adult-level performance on ToM tasks overall, and that GPT-4 exceeds adult performance on 6th order inferences. Our results suggest that there is an interplay between model size and finetuning for the realisation of ToM abilities, and that the best-performing LLMs have developed a generalised capacity for ToM. Given the role that higher-order ToM plays in a wide range of cooperative and competitive human behaviours, these findings have significant implications for user-facing LLM applications.
Read more6/3/2024
0
Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Models
Huao Li, Yu Quan Chong, Simon Stepputtis, Joseph Campbell, Dana Hughes, Michael Lewis, Katia Sycara
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive accomplishments in both reasoning and planning, their abilities in multi-agent collaborations remains largely unexplored. This study evaluates LLM-based agents in a multi-agent cooperative text game with Theory of Mind (ToM) inference tasks, comparing their performance with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) and planning-based baselines. We observed evidence of emergent collaborative behaviors and high-order Theory of Mind capabilities among LLM-based agents. Our results reveal limitations in LLM-based agents' planning optimization due to systematic failures in managing long-horizon contexts and hallucination about the task state. We explore the use of explicit belief state representations to mitigate these issues, finding that it enhances task performance and the accuracy of ToM inferences for LLM-based agents.
Read more6/28/2024