Perspective in Opinion Dynamics on Complex Convex Domains of Time Networks for Addiction, Forgetting
2311.15318
0
0
🔎
Abstract
This paper revises previous work and introduces changes in spatio-temporal scales. The paper presents a model that includes layers A and B with varying degrees of forgetting and dependence over time. We also model changes in dependence and forgetting in layers A, A', B, and B' under certain conditions. In addition, to discuss the formation of opinion clusters that have reinforcing or obstructive behaviors of forgetting and dependence and are conservative or brainwashing or detoxifying and less prone to filter bubbling, new clusters C and D that recommend, obstruct, block, or incite forgetting and dependence over time are Introduction. This introduction allows us to test hypotheses regarding the expansion of opinions in two dimensions over time and space, the state of development of opinion space, and the expansion of public opinion. Challenges in consensus building will be highlighted, emphasizing the dynamic nature of opinions and the need to consider factors such as dissent, distrust, and media influence. The paper proposes an extended framework that incorporates trust, distrust, and media influence into the consensus building model. We introduce network analysis using dimerizing as a method to gain deeper insights. In this context, we discuss network clustering, media influence, and consensus building. The location and distribution of dimers will be analyzed to gain insight into the structure and dynamics of the network. Dimertiling has been applied in various fields other than network analysis, such as physics and sociology. The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of diverse perspectives, network analysis, and influential entities in consensus building. It also introduces torus-based visualizations that aid in understanding complex network structures.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new model for understanding the dynamics of opinions in social networks over time and space.
- The model includes layers with varying degrees of forgetting and dependence, and explores how these factors influence the formation of opinion clusters.
- The paper also discusses challenges in consensus building, emphasizing the need to consider factors like dissent, distrust, and media influence.
- Network analysis using dimerizing is proposed as a method to gain deeper insights into the structure and dynamics of opinion networks.
- The paper concludes by highlighting the importance of diverse perspectives, network analysis, and influential entities in consensus building, and introduces torus-based visualizations to aid understanding.
Plain English Explanation
This paper looks at how people's opinions change over time and space in social networks. The researchers created a model with different "layers" that have varying degrees of how much people forget their previous opinions and how much they are influenced by others.
The model explores how these factors of forgetting and dependence can lead to the formation of different types of opinion clusters. Some of these clusters might have opinions that reinforce each other or block changes, while others might be more open to changing their minds.
The paper also discusses the challenges of getting people to agree on things, called "consensus building." It emphasizes that opinions are constantly changing and that factors like disagreement, distrust, and the influence of media play an important role.
To better understand these opinion networks, the researchers propose using a technique called "network analysis" that looks at how different people or groups are connected and influence each other. This can provide insights into the structure and dynamics of the network.
Overall, the paper highlights the importance of considering diverse perspectives, network analysis, and influential entities when trying to understand and build consensus around opinions in social networks.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a model that includes multiple layers (A, A', B, and B') with varying degrees of forgetting and dependence over time. The researchers explore how changes in these factors of forgetting and dependence can influence the formation of different types of opinion clusters, such as those that are reinforcing or obstructive, conservative or brainwashing, and less prone to filter bubbling.
The model allows the researchers to test hypotheses about the expansion of opinions in two dimensions over time and space, as well as the development of opinion space and the expansion of public opinion. The paper also introduces new opinion clusters (C and D) that can recommend, obstruct, block, or incite forgetting and dependence over time.
To gain deeper insights into the structure and dynamics of the opinion network, the researchers propose using network analysis techniques, such as dimerizing. This involves analyzing the location and distribution of dimers (pairs of connected nodes) to understand the network's clustering, media influence, and consensus building processes.
The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of diverse perspectives, network analysis, and influential entities in consensus building. It also introduces torus-based visualizations to aid in understanding the complex network structures.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive model for understanding the dynamics of opinions in social networks, but it also acknowledges several challenges and limitations. For example, the model simplifies some aspects of opinion formation and may not fully capture the nuances of real-world social dynamics.
Additionally, while the network analysis techniques proposed, such as dimerizing, can provide valuable insights, they may not be able to fully capture the complexity of opinion networks, which can be influenced by a wide range of factors beyond just the network structure.
The paper also does not address potential issues related to data privacy and ethical concerns that may arise when analyzing large-scale social network data. As with any research in this field, there is a need to carefully consider the potential societal impacts and ensure that the work is conducted in a responsible and transparent manner.
Despite these limitations, the paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of opinion dynamics and consensus building in social networks. The proposed model and analysis techniques provide a useful framework for further research and exploration in this rapidly evolving field.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel model for understanding the dynamics of opinions in social networks, with a focus on the role of forgetting, dependence, and the formation of opinion clusters. The researchers introduce network analysis techniques, such as dimerizing, to gain deeper insights into the structure and dynamics of opinion networks.
The paper highlights the importance of considering diverse perspectives, media influence, and the role of influential entities in consensus building. It also introduces torus-based visualizations to aid in understanding the complex network structures.
While the paper acknowledges several challenges and limitations, it makes a significant contribution to the field of opinion dynamics research. The proposed model and analysis techniques provide a valuable framework for further exploration and can help inform strategies for building consensus and addressing the spread of polarized opinions in online and offline social networks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎯
Asynchronous Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks
Petra Berenbrink, Martin Hoefer, Dominik Kaaser, Pascal Lenzner, Malin Rau, Daniel Schmand
0
0
Opinion spreading in a society decides the fate of elections, the success of products, and the impact of political or social movements. The model by Hegselmann and Krause is a well-known theoretical model to study such opinion formation processes in social networks. In contrast to many other theoretical models, it does not converge towards a situation where all agents agree on the same opinion. Instead, it assumes that people find an opinion reasonable if and only if it is close to their own. The system converges towards a stable situation where agents sharing the same opinion form a cluster, and agents in different clusters do not mbox{influence each other.} We focus on the social variant of the Hegselmann-Krause model where agents are connected by a social network and their opinions evolve in an iterative process. When activated, an agent adopts the average of the opinions of its neighbors having a similar opinion. By this, the set of influencing neighbors of an agent may change over time. To the best of our knowledge, social Hegselmann-Krause systems with asynchronous opinion updates have only been studied with the complete graph as social network. We show that such opinion dynamics with random agent activation are guaranteed to converge for any social network. We provide an upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n|E|^2 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$ on the expected number of opinion updates until convergence, where $|E|$ is the number of edges of the social network. For the complete social network we show a bound of $mathcal{O}(n^3(n^2 + (varepsilon/delta)^2))$ that represents a major improvement over the previously best upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n^9 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$. Our bounds are complemented by simulations that indicate asymptotically matching lower bounds.
4/16/2024
Opinion Dynamics for Utility Maximizing Agents: Exploring the Impact of Resource Penalty
Prashil Wankhede, Nirabhra Mandal, Sonia Mart'inez, Pavankumar Tallapragada
0
0
We propose a continuous-time nonlinear model of opinion dynamics with utility-maximizing agents connected via a social influence network. A distinguishing feature of the proposed model is the inclusion of an opinion-dependent resource-penalty term in the utilities, which limits the agents from holding opinions of large magnitude. The proposed utility functions also account for how the relative resources within the social group affect both an agent's stubbornness and social influence. Each agent myopically seeks to maximize its utility by revising its opinion in the gradient ascent direction of its utility function, thus leading to the proposed opinion dynamics. We show that, for any arbitrary social influence network, opinions are ultimately bounded. For networks with weak antagonistic relations, we show that there exists a globally exponentially stable equilibrium using contraction theory. We establish conditions for the existence of consensus equilibrium and analyze the relative dominance of the agents at consensus. We also conduct a game-theoretic analysis of the underlying opinion formation game, including on Nash equilibria and on prices of anarchy in terms of satisfaction ratios. Additionally, we also investigate the oscillatory behavior of opinions in a two-agent scenario. Finally, simulations illustrate our findings.
4/9/2024
💬
On the Principles behind Opinion Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems of Large Language Models
Pedro Cisneros-Velarde
0
0
We study the evolution of opinions inside a population of interacting large language models (LLMs). Every LLM needs to decide how much funding to allocate to an item with three initial possibilities: full, partial, or no funding. We identify biases that drive the exchange of opinions based on the LLM's tendency to (i) find consensus with the other LLM's opinion, (ii) display caution when specifying funding, and (iii) consider ethical concerns in its opinion. We find these biases are affected by the perceived absence of compelling reasons for opinion change, the perceived willingness to engage in discussion, and the distribution of allocation values. Moreover, tensions among biases can lead to the survival of funding for items with negative connotations. We also find that the final distribution of full, partial, and no funding opinions is more diverse when an LLM freely forms its opinion after an interaction than when its opinion is a multiple-choice selection among the three allocation options. In the latter case, consensus or polarization is generally attained. When agents are aware of past opinions, they seek to maintain consistency with them, and more diverse updating rules emerge. Our study is performed using a Llama 3 LLM.
6/26/2024
Relational Reasoning On Graphs Using Opinion Dynamics
Yulong Yang, Bowen Feng, Keqin Wang, Naomi Leonard, Adji Bousso Dieng, Christine Allen-Blanchette
0
0
From pedestrians to Kuramoto oscillators, interactions between agents govern how a multitude of dynamical systems evolve in space and time. Discovering how these agents relate to each other can improve our understanding of the often complex dynamics that underlie these systems. Recent works learn to categorize relationships between agents based on observations of their physical behavior. These approaches are limited in that the relationship categories are modelled as independent and mutually exclusive, when in real world systems categories are often interacting. In this work, we introduce a level of abstraction between the physical behavior of agents and the categories that define their behavior. To do this, we learn a mapping from the agents' states to their affinities for each category in a graph neural network. We integrate the physical proximity of agents and their affinities in a nonlinear opinion dynamics model which provides a mechanism to identify mutually exclusive categories, predict an agent's evolution in time, and control an agent's behavior. We demonstrate the utility of our model for learning interpretable categories for mechanical systems, and demonstrate its efficacy on several long-horizon trajectory prediction benchmarks where we consistently out perform existing methods.
6/24/2024