Physics-Aware Multifidelity Bayesian Optimization: a Generalized Formulation

Read original: arXiv:2312.05831 - Published 7/8/2024 by Francesco Di Fiore, Laura Mainini
Total Score

0

Physics-Aware Multifidelity Bayesian Optimization: a Generalized Formulation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a generalized formulation of physics-aware multifidelity Bayesian optimization.
  • It extends previous work on multifidelity Bayesian optimization by incorporating physical knowledge into the optimization process.
  • The approach aims to improve optimization performance and efficiency compared to traditional Bayesian optimization methods.

Plain English Explanation

[object Object] is a technique used to find the optimal inputs for a function when the function is expensive to evaluate. The authors of this paper wanted to make Bayesian optimization even more efficient by incorporating [object Object] about the problem.

Imagine you're trying to design the most efficient engine. You could test different engine designs, but each test is costly and time-consuming. Bayesian optimization can help you find the best design by intelligently choosing which designs to test, based on the results of previous tests.

The key innovation in this paper is that the authors incorporated physical laws and principles into the Bayesian optimization process. For example, they might use physics equations to predict how certain engine design changes will affect the engine's efficiency, rather than just relying on the results of past tests.

By incorporating this physical knowledge, the authors were able to make the Bayesian optimization process more efficient and accurate, helping engineers find the optimal engine design more quickly.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a [object Object]. This approach extends previous work on [object Object], where multiple simulation fidelities or approximations of the true objective function are used to guide the optimization process.

The key contribution of this paper is the incorporation of physical knowledge into the multifidelity Bayesian optimization framework. Specifically, the authors leverage physical models or [object Object] to obtain lower-fidelity approximations of the true objective function. These approximations are then used alongside higher-fidelity observations to guide the optimization.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through several case studies, including the optimization of an airfoil design and a chemical process. They show that by incorporating physical knowledge, their method can outperform traditional Bayesian optimization approaches in terms of optimization performance and efficiency.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough approach to incorporating physical knowledge into multifidelity Bayesian optimization. The authors have clearly put a lot of thought into the theoretical foundations and practical implementation of their method.

One potential limitation of the approach is the reliance on accurate physical models or simulators. If these models do not accurately capture the true underlying physics of the problem, the optimization process may be misguided. The authors acknowledge this limitation and suggest that future work could explore methods for [object Object] as the optimization progresses.

Additionally, the paper focuses on single-objective optimization problems. Extending the approach to [object Object] could be an interesting avenue for future research, as many real-world engineering problems involve balancing multiple competing objectives.

Conclusion

This paper presents a generalized formulation of physics-aware multifidelity Bayesian optimization, which leverages physical knowledge to improve the efficiency and performance of the optimization process. By incorporating physical models and simulators, the authors have demonstrated the potential of this approach to outperform traditional Bayesian optimization methods.

The work has important implications for a wide range of engineering and scientific applications, where the ability to quickly and accurately optimize complex systems can lead to significant advancements. As the authors continue to refine and expand their approach, it will be exciting to see how it is applied to solve real-world challenges.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Physics-Aware Multifidelity Bayesian Optimization: a Generalized Formulation
Total Score

0

Physics-Aware Multifidelity Bayesian Optimization: a Generalized Formulation

Francesco Di Fiore, Laura Mainini

The adoption of high-fidelity models for many-query optimization problems is majorly limited by the significant computational cost required for their evaluation at every query. Multifidelity Bayesian methods (MFBO) allow to include costly high-fidelity responses for a sub-selection of queries only, and use fast lower-fidelity models to accelerate the optimization process. State-of-the-art methods rely on a purely data-driven search and do not include explicit information about the physical context. This paper acknowledges that prior knowledge about the physical domains of engineering problems can be leveraged to accelerate these data-driven searches, and proposes a generalized formulation for MFBO to embed a form of domain awareness during the optimization procedure. In particular, we formalize a bias as a multifidelity acquisition function that captures the physical structure of the domain. This permits to partially alleviate the data-driven search from learning the domain properties on-the-fly, and sensitively enhances the management of multiple sources of information. The method allows to efficiently include high-fidelity simulations to guide the optimization search while containing the overall computational expense. Our physics-aware multifidelity Bayesian optimization is presented and illustrated for two classes of optimization problems frequently met in science and engineering, namely design optimization and health monitoring problems.

Read more

7/8/2024

Applying Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization in Chemistry: Open Challenges and Major Considerations
Total Score

0

Applying Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization in Chemistry: Open Challenges and Major Considerations

Edmund Judge, Mohammed Azzouzi, Austin M. Mroz, Antonio del Rio Chanona, Kim E. Jelfs

Multi fidelity Bayesian optimization (MFBO) leverages experimental and or computational data of varying quality and resource cost to optimize towards desired maxima cost effectively. This approach is particularly attractive for chemical discovery due to MFBO's ability to integrate diverse data sources. Here, we investigate the application of MFBO to accelerate the identification of promising molecules or materials. We specifically analyze the conditions under which lower fidelity data can enhance performance compared to single-fidelity problem formulations. We address two key challenges, selecting the optimal acquisition function, understanding the impact of cost, and data fidelity correlation. We then discuss how to assess the effectiveness of MFBO for chemical discovery.

Read more

9/12/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Non-Myopic Multifidelity Bayesian Optimization

Francesco Di Fiore, Laura Mainini

Bayesian optimization is a popular framework for the optimization of black box functions. Multifidelity methods allows to accelerate Bayesian optimization by exploiting low-fidelity representations of expensive objective functions. Popular multifidelity Bayesian strategies rely on sampling policies that account for the immediate reward obtained evaluating the objective function at a specific input, precluding greater informative gains that might be obtained looking ahead more steps. This paper proposes a non-myopic multifidelity Bayesian framework to grasp the long-term reward from future steps of the optimization. Our computational strategy comes with a two-step lookahead multifidelity acquisition function that maximizes the cumulative reward obtained measuring the improvement in the solution over two steps ahead. We demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms a standard multifidelity Bayesian framework on popular benchmark optimization problems.

Read more

7/8/2024

FastBO: Fast HPO and NAS with Adaptive Fidelity Identification
Total Score

0

FastBO: Fast HPO and NAS with Adaptive Fidelity Identification

Jiantong Jiang, Ajmal Mian

Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) and neural architecture search (NAS) are powerful in attaining state-of-the-art machine learning models, with Bayesian optimization (BO) standing out as a mainstream method. Extending BO into the multi-fidelity setting has been an emerging research topic, but faces the challenge of determining an appropriate fidelity for each hyperparameter configuration to fit the surrogate model. To tackle the challenge, we propose a multi-fidelity BO method named FastBO, which adaptively decides the fidelity for each configuration and efficiently offers strong performance. The advantages are achieved based on the novel concepts of efficient point and saturation point for each configuration.We also show that our adaptive fidelity identification strategy provides a way to extend any single-fidelity method to the multi-fidelity setting, highlighting its generality and applicability.

Read more

9/4/2024