FastBO: Fast HPO and NAS with Adaptive Fidelity Identification

Overview

• FastBO is a new approach to hyperparameter optimization (HPO) and neural architecture search (NAS) that uses adaptive fidelity identification to speed up the optimization process.
• The key idea is to automatically adjust the fidelity (e.g., training epochs, dataset size) of the objective function during the optimization to find the best configuration quickly.
• FastBO is designed to be more efficient than existing multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization methods.

Plain English Explanation

FastBO: Fast HPO and NAS with Adaptive Fidelity Identification is a new technique for optimizing the hyperparameters of machine learning models and searching for the best neural network architecture. The core idea is to automatically adjust the "fidelity" of the objective function being optimized during the process.

Fidelity refers to factors like the number of training epochs or the size of the dataset used to evaluate a model configuration. Higher fidelity means more accurate but also more computationally expensive evaluations. Lower fidelity means faster but less accurate evaluations.

Traditional multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization methods require the user to manually specify the fidelity schedule upfront. In contrast, FastBO can dynamically adjust the fidelity as the optimization progresses in order to find the optimal configuration as efficiently as possible. This adaptivity is the key innovation that allows FastBO to outperform existing methods.

By automatically tuning the fidelity, FastBO can quickly identify promising model configurations using inexpensive low-fidelity evaluations, and then refine them with more expensive high-fidelity evaluations. This allows it to converge to the global optimum faster than prior approaches.

Technical Explanation

FastBO: Fast HPO and NAS with Adaptive Fidelity Identification introduces a new Bayesian optimization algorithm called FastBO that can adaptively adjust the fidelity of the objective function during the optimization process.

The paper first formulates the multi-fidelity optimization problem, where the goal is to find the configuration x* that minimizes the high-fidelity objective f(x) by strategically evaluating the objective at different fidelity levels. The key idea of FastBO is to automatically determine the optimal fidelity scheduling, rather than requiring the user to specify it upfront.

FastBO achieves this by maintaining a Gaussian process (GP) surrogate model of the high-fidelity objective f(x) and another GP model of the fidelity-dependent discrepancy between the low and high-fidelity objectives. These models are used to adaptively select the fidelity level that is most informative for improving the optimization.

The authors prove that FastBO has stronger theoretical guarantees than existing multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization methods. They also demonstrate through experiments on HPO and NAS benchmarks that FastBO can significantly outperform state-of-the-art techniques in terms of sample efficiency and optimization time.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a robust theoretical analysis of the FastBO algorithm and its advantages over prior work. The experiments are well-designed and the results are compelling, showing clear performance improvements on a range of benchmark tasks.

One limitation mentioned in the paper is that FastBO relies on the assumption that the discrepancy between low and high-fidelity objectives can be well-modeled by a GP. This may not hold true in all real-world applications, so further research could explore relaxing this assumption.

Additionally, the paper does not extensively compare FastBO to single-fidelity Bayesian optimization. It would be helpful to understand how much of the observed speedup is due to the adaptive fidelity mechanism versus the core Bayesian optimization algorithm.

Overall, FastBO represents an interesting and promising advancement in the field of multi-fidelity optimization, with potential applications in hyperparameter tuning, neural architecture search, and beyond.

Conclusion

FastBO: Fast HPO and NAS with Adaptive Fidelity Identification introduces a new Bayesian optimization algorithm called FastBO that can dynamically adjust the fidelity of the objective function being optimized. This adaptive fidelity identification allows FastBO to converge to the optimal configuration more efficiently than prior multi-fidelity methods.

The key innovation of FastBO is its ability to automatically determine the optimal fidelity scheduling, without requiring manual tuning by the user. This adaptivity is enabled by maintaining Gaussian process models of both the high-fidelity objective and the fidelity-dependent discrepancy.

Experiments show that FastBO outperforms state-of-the-art multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization techniques on hyperparameter optimization and neural architecture search benchmarks. This suggests that FastBO could be a valuable tool for accelerating the development of high-performing machine learning models.

While the paper makes important theoretical and empirical contributions, further research could explore relaxing some of the underlying assumptions and comparing FastBO to single-fidelity methods. Nonetheless, this work represents a significant step forward in the field of efficient model optimization.