PIPER: Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Hindsight Relabeling

Read original: arXiv:2404.13423 - Published 6/18/2024 by Utsav Singh, Wesley A. Suttle, Brian M. Sadler, Vinay P. Namboodiri, Amrit Singh Bedi
Total Score

0

PIPER: Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Hindsight Relabeling

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces PIPER, a method for Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Hindsight Relabeling.
  • PIPER aims to enable an agent to learn complex skills by leveraging a set of pre-defined "primitive" behaviors and human preferences.
  • The approach involves a hierarchical reinforcement learning framework that uses hindsight relabeling to efficiently explore the task space.

Plain English Explanation

PIPER is a new way for artificial intelligence (AI) systems to learn complex tasks by building on simpler, pre-defined skills. The key idea is to provide the AI with a set of basic "primitive" behaviors that it can then combine and refine to accomplish more sophisticated goals.

Imagine you're teaching a robot how to make a sandwich. Instead of starting from scratch, you could give it the primitive skills to grasp objects, spread condiments, and assemble ingredients. The robot would then use these building blocks to figure out how to make a complete sandwich, learning from trial and error and from feedback about how "good" the final sandwich is.

PIPER takes a similar approach, but in a more general and powerful way. It allows the AI to learn complex behaviors by exploring different combinations of these primitive skills, while also incorporating feedback from humans about which outcomes are preferred. This "preference-based" learning helps the AI system understand what the desired goal is, even if it's hard to specify that goal precisely upfront.

The key innovation in PIPER is the use of "hindsight relabeling," which allows the AI to learn efficiently from its mistakes. Instead of just focusing on the final outcome, the system can re-examine its actions along the way and figure out how they could have been improved to better achieve the preferred goal.

By combining primitive skills, preference-based learning, and hindsight relabeling, PIPER enables AI systems to tackle complex challenges in a more flexible and sample-efficient way. This could have important applications in robotics, game AI, and other areas where we want AI agents to learn sophisticated behaviors.

Technical Explanation

PIPER is a hierarchical reinforcement learning framework that leverages a set of pre-defined "primitive" behaviors and human preferences to enable an agent to learn complex skills.

The core components of PIPER include:

  1. Primitive Behaviors: The agent is provided with a set of basic skills or "primitives" that it can use as building blocks to accomplish more complicated tasks.

  2. Preference-based Learning: The agent receives feedback from humans about the desirability of different outcomes, allowing it to learn which behaviors are preferred.

  3. Hindsight Relabeling: The agent re-examines its past actions and learns how they could have been improved to better achieve the preferred goal, even if the final outcome was not ideal.

The hierarchical structure of PIPER allows the agent to combine and refine the primitive behaviors to solve complex, multi-step problems. The preference-based learning component guides the agent towards behaviors that align with human values, while the hindsight relabeling mechanism enables efficient exploration of the task space.

The authors evaluate PIPER on several challenging robotic control tasks and demonstrate that it outperforms alternative approaches, such as CRISP, PEAR, and Hindsight Priors, in terms of sample efficiency and final performance.

Critical Analysis

The PIPER framework represents a promising approach to hierarchical reinforcement learning that leverages human preferences and hindsight relabeling to enable efficient skill acquisition. However, the paper does not fully address some potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Scalability and Generalization: While PIPER demonstrates strong performance on the evaluated tasks, it's unclear how well the approach would scale to more complex, real-world problems with a larger action space and more diverse primitive behaviors.

  2. Robustness to Noisy Preferences: The paper assumes that human preferences are provided accurately and consistently. In practice, preference feedback may be noisy or biased, which could negatively impact the agent's learning.

  3. Interpretability and Transparency: The hierarchical nature of PIPER could make it challenging to understand and interpret the agent's decision-making process, which may be a concern for applications that require explainability.

  4. Alignment with Human Values: While PIPER incorporates human preferences, it's important to consider whether the learned behaviors are truly aligned with broader human values and ethical principles, especially as the agent's skills become more sophisticated.

Future research could explore ways to address these limitations, such as by developing techniques to improve the scalability and robustness of PIPER, or by investigating methods to enhance the interpretability and value alignment of the learned behaviors.

Conclusion

PIPER represents a significant advancement in the field of hierarchical reinforcement learning, offering a novel approach that combines primitive behaviors, preference-based learning, and hindsight relabeling to enable efficient skill acquisition. By leveraging human preferences and exploiting the structure of complex tasks, PIPER demonstrates strong performance on challenging robotic control problems and has the potential to unlock new applications for AI systems in a wide range of domains.

While the paper identifies several promising avenues for future work, the core ideas behind PIPER, such as the use of primitive skills, preference-based learning, and hindsight relabeling, represent important steps towards developing more capable and aligned AI systems that can learn sophisticated behaviors from limited data and in accordance with human values.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

PIPER: Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Hindsight Relabeling
Total Score

0

PIPER: Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Hindsight Relabeling

Utsav Singh, Wesley A. Suttle, Brian M. Sadler, Vinay P. Namboodiri, Amrit Singh Bedi

In this work, we introduce PIPER: Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical reinforcement learning via Hindsight Relabeling, a novel approach that leverages preference-based learning to learn a reward model, and subsequently uses this reward model to relabel higher-level replay buffers. Since this reward is unaffected by lower primitive behavior, our relabeling-based approach is able to mitigate non-stationarity, which is common in existing hierarchical approaches, and demonstrates impressive performance across a range of challenging sparse-reward tasks. Since obtaining human feedback is typically impractical, we propose to replace the human-in-the-loop approach with our primitive-in-the-loop approach, which generates feedback using sparse rewards provided by the environment. Moreover, in order to prevent infeasible subgoal prediction and avoid degenerate solutions, we propose primitive-informed regularization that conditions higher-level policies to generate feasible subgoals for lower-level policies. We perform extensive experiments to show that PIPER mitigates non-stationarity in hierarchical reinforcement learning and achieves greater than 50$%$ success rates in challenging, sparse-reward robotic environments, where most other baselines fail to achieve any significant progress.

Read more

6/18/2024

DIPPER: Direct Preference Optimization to Accelerate Primitive-Enabled Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

DIPPER: Direct Preference Optimization to Accelerate Primitive-Enabled Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

Utsav Singh, Souradip Chakraborty, Wesley A. Suttle, Brian M. Sadler, Vinay P Namboodiri, Amrit Singh Bedi

Learning control policies to perform complex robotics tasks from human preference data presents significant challenges. On the one hand, the complexity of such tasks typically requires learning policies to perform a variety of subtasks, then combining them to achieve the overall goal. At the same time, comprehensive, well-engineered reward functions are typically unavailable in such problems, while limited human preference data often is; making efficient use of such data to guide learning is therefore essential. Methods for learning to perform complex robotics tasks from human preference data must overcome both these challenges simultaneously. In this work, we introduce DIPPER: Direct Preference Optimization to Accelerate Primitive-Enabled Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning, an efficient hierarchical approach that leverages direct preference optimization to learn a higher-level policy and reinforcement learning to learn a lower-level policy. DIPPER enjoys improved computational efficiency due to its use of direct preference optimization instead of standard preference-based approaches such as reinforcement learning from human feedback, while it also mitigates the well-known hierarchical reinforcement learning issues of non-stationarity and infeasible subgoal generation due to our use of primitive-informed regularization inspired by a novel bi-level optimization formulation of the hierarchical reinforcement learning problem. To validate our approach, we perform extensive experimental analysis on a variety of challenging robotics tasks, demonstrating that DIPPER outperforms hierarchical and non-hierarchical baselines, while ameliorating the non-stationarity and infeasible subgoal generation issues of hierarchical reinforcement learning.

Read more

6/18/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

CRISP: Curriculum inducing Primitive Informed Subgoal Prediction

Utsav Singh, Vinay P. Namboodiri

Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) is a promising approach that uses temporal abstraction to solve complex long horizon problems. However, simultaneously learning a hierarchy of policies is unstable as it is challenging to train higher-level policy when the lower-level primitive is non-stationary. In this paper, we present CRISP, a novel HRL algorithm that effectively generates a curriculum of achievable subgoals for evolving lower-level primitives using reinforcement learning and imitation learning. CRISP uses the lower level primitive to periodically perform data relabeling on a handful of expert demonstrations, using a novel primitive informed parsing (PIP) approach, thereby mitigating non-stationarity. Since our approach only assumes access to a handful of expert demonstrations, it is suitable for most robotic control tasks. Experimental evaluations on complex robotic maze navigation and robotic manipulation tasks demonstrate that inducing hierarchical curriculum learning significantly improves sample efficiency, and results in efficient goal conditioned policies for solving temporally extended tasks. Additionally, we perform real world robotic experiments on complex manipulation tasks and demonstrate that CRISP demonstrates impressive generalization in real world scenarios.

Read more

4/23/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

PEAR: Primitive enabled Adaptive Relabeling for boosting Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

Utsav Singh, Vinay P. Namboodiri

Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) has the potential to solve complex long horizon tasks using temporal abstraction and increased exploration. However, hierarchical agents are difficult to train due to inherent non-stationarity. We present primitive enabled adaptive relabeling (PEAR), a two-phase approach where we first perform adaptive relabeling on a few expert demonstrations to generate efficient subgoal supervision, and then jointly optimize HRL agents by employing reinforcement learning (RL) and imitation learning (IL). We perform theoretical analysis to $(i)$ bound the sub-optimality of our approach, and $(ii)$ derive a generalized plug-and-play framework for joint optimization using RL and IL. Since PEAR utilizes only a handful of expert demonstrations and considers minimal limiting assumptions on the task structure, it can be easily integrated with typical off-policy RL algorithms to produce a practical HRL approach. We perform extensive experiments on challenging environments and show that PEAR is able to outperform various hierarchical and non-hierarchical baselines on complex tasks that require long term decision making. We also perform ablations to thoroughly analyse the importance of our various design choices. Finally, we perform real world robotic experiments on complex tasks and demonstrate that PEAR consistently outperforms the baselines.

Read more

4/23/2024