DIPPER: Direct Preference Optimization to Accelerate Primitive-Enabled Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces DIPPER, a novel approach to Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (HRL) that leverages direct preference optimization to accelerate the learning process.
- DIPPER builds upon prior work in PIPER and CRISP, which focused on incorporating primitive skills and subgoal prediction to enhance HRL.
- The key innovation in DIPPER is the use of direct preference optimization, which aims to learn a policy that directly maximizes the human's unobserved preference function, rather than relying on a predefined reward function.
Plain English Explanation
DIPPER is a new way of teaching AI agents to solve complex tasks by breaking them down into smaller, more manageable steps. Rather than defining a specific reward function for the agent to optimize, DIPPER tries to directly learn what the human prefers the agent to do.
This is done by leveraging the agent's existing "primitive" skills - basic actions it can already perform - and using those to build up more complex behaviors. The agent also learns to predict what subgoals it should aim for to please the human. By focusing on directly optimizing the human's preferences, rather than a pre-defined reward, DIPPER can help the agent learn faster and perform better on the overall task.
The key idea is that humans often have nuanced preferences that are difficult to fully capture in a reward function. DIPPER tries to sidestep this challenge by directly learning the human's preferences through interaction, rather than relying on a manually-specified reward. This can lead to more natural and human-aligned behavior from the AI agent.
Technical Explanation
DIPPER builds upon prior work in PIPER and CRISP, which leveraged the use of "primitive" skills and subgoal prediction to enhance Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (HRL). The key innovation in DIPPER is the incorporation of direct preference optimization.
Rather than defining a specific reward function for the agent to optimize, DIPPER aims to directly learn the human's unobserved preference function through interaction. This is achieved by having the agent learn a policy that maximizes the human's preferences, as observed through their feedback or demonstrations.
The DIPPER architecture combines hierarchical control, where the agent learns both low-level primitives and high-level policies, with a direct preference modeling component. This allows the agent to not only learn effective skills and subgoals, but also to optimize its behavior to directly match the human's preferences, as opposed to a pre-defined reward signal.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of DIPPER on a range of benchmark tasks, showing that it can outperform traditional HRL approaches that rely on predefined rewards. They also conduct analysis to better understand the role of preference learning in accelerating skill acquisition and task performance.
Critical Analysis
The DIPPER approach presents an interesting alternative to standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) by focusing on directly optimizing the human's preferences rather than a predefined reward function. This can be beneficial in situations where the reward function is difficult to specify or may not fully capture the nuances of human preferences.
However, the authors acknowledge that learning the human's unobserved preference function can be challenging, particularly in complex real-world scenarios. The success of DIPPER may depend on the quality and consistency of the human feedback or demonstrations used to guide the preference learning process.
Additionally, the authors do not extensively explore the potential downsides or limitations of their approach. For example, it's unclear how DIPPER would handle situations where the human's preferences are ambiguous, inconsistent, or potentially unethical. Further research may be needed to understand the robustness and safety considerations of directly optimizing for human preferences in RL.
Despite these caveats, the DIPPER framework represents an intriguing step towards more human-aligned and efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning. By leveraging primitive skills and subgoal prediction, while also incorporating direct preference optimization, the authors have demonstrated a promising approach for reinforcement learning from diverse human preferences.
Conclusion
In summary, the DIPPER framework represents a novel approach to Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning that aims to accelerate the learning process by directly optimizing for the human's unobserved preferences, rather than a predefined reward function. By leveraging primitive skills and subgoal prediction, DIPPER can help AI agents learn more efficient and human-aligned behaviors, with potential applications in various domains where complex decision-making is required.
While the DIPPER approach shows promise, further research may be needed to address potential limitations and ensure the robustness and safety of the preference learning process. Nevertheless, this work contributes to the growing body of research on direct preference optimization and reinforcement learning from diverse human preferences, which could have significant implications for the development of more natural and human-centric AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
DIPPER: Direct Preference Optimization to Accelerate Primitive-Enabled Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
Utsav Singh, Souradip Chakraborty, Wesley A. Suttle, Brian M. Sadler, Vinay P Namboodiri, Amrit Singh Bedi
Learning control policies to perform complex robotics tasks from human preference data presents significant challenges. On the one hand, the complexity of such tasks typically requires learning policies to perform a variety of subtasks, then combining them to achieve the overall goal. At the same time, comprehensive, well-engineered reward functions are typically unavailable in such problems, while limited human preference data often is; making efficient use of such data to guide learning is therefore essential. Methods for learning to perform complex robotics tasks from human preference data must overcome both these challenges simultaneously. In this work, we introduce DIPPER: Direct Preference Optimization to Accelerate Primitive-Enabled Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning, an efficient hierarchical approach that leverages direct preference optimization to learn a higher-level policy and reinforcement learning to learn a lower-level policy. DIPPER enjoys improved computational efficiency due to its use of direct preference optimization instead of standard preference-based approaches such as reinforcement learning from human feedback, while it also mitigates the well-known hierarchical reinforcement learning issues of non-stationarity and infeasible subgoal generation due to our use of primitive-informed regularization inspired by a novel bi-level optimization formulation of the hierarchical reinforcement learning problem. To validate our approach, we perform extensive experimental analysis on a variety of challenging robotics tasks, demonstrating that DIPPER outperforms hierarchical and non-hierarchical baselines, while ameliorating the non-stationarity and infeasible subgoal generation issues of hierarchical reinforcement learning.
Read more6/18/2024
0
PIPER: Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Hindsight Relabeling
Utsav Singh, Wesley A. Suttle, Brian M. Sadler, Vinay P. Namboodiri, Amrit Singh Bedi
In this work, we introduce PIPER: Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical reinforcement learning via Hindsight Relabeling, a novel approach that leverages preference-based learning to learn a reward model, and subsequently uses this reward model to relabel higher-level replay buffers. Since this reward is unaffected by lower primitive behavior, our relabeling-based approach is able to mitigate non-stationarity, which is common in existing hierarchical approaches, and demonstrates impressive performance across a range of challenging sparse-reward tasks. Since obtaining human feedback is typically impractical, we propose to replace the human-in-the-loop approach with our primitive-in-the-loop approach, which generates feedback using sparse rewards provided by the environment. Moreover, in order to prevent infeasible subgoal prediction and avoid degenerate solutions, we propose primitive-informed regularization that conditions higher-level policies to generate feasible subgoals for lower-level policies. We perform extensive experiments to show that PIPER mitigates non-stationarity in hierarchical reinforcement learning and achieves greater than 50$%$ success rates in challenging, sparse-reward robotic environments, where most other baselines fail to achieve any significant progress.
Read more6/18/2024
0
New Desiderata for Direct Preference Optimization
Xiangkun Hu, Tong He, David Wipf
Large language models in the past have typically relied on some form of reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) to better align model responses with human preferences. However, because of oft-observed instabilities when implementing these RLHF pipelines, various reparameterization techniques have recently been introduced to sidestep the need for separately learning an RL reward model. Instead, directly fine-tuning for human preferences is achieved via the minimization of a single closed-form training objective, a process originally referred to as direct preference optimization (DPO) and followed by several notable descendants. Although effective in certain real-world settings, we introduce new evaluation criteria that serve to highlight unresolved shortcomings in the ability of existing DPO methods to interpolate between a pre-trained reference model and empirical measures of human preferences, as well as unavoidable trade-offs in how low- and high-quality responses are regularized and constraints are handled. Our insights then motivate an alternative DPO-like loss that provably mitigates these limitations. Empirical results serve to corroborate notable aspects of our analyses.
Read more7/15/2024
📈
0
Reward Model Learning vs. Direct Policy Optimization: A Comparative Analysis of Learning from Human Preferences
Andi Nika, Debmalya Mandal, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Georgios Tzannetos, Goran Radanovi'c, Adish Singla
In this paper, we take a step towards a deeper understanding of learning from human preferences by systematically comparing the paradigm of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) with the recently proposed paradigm of direct preference optimization (DPO). We focus our attention on the class of loglinear policy parametrization and linear reward functions. In order to compare the two paradigms, we first derive minimax statistical bounds on the suboptimality gap induced by both RLHF and DPO, assuming access to an oracle that exactly solves the optimization problems. We provide a detailed discussion on the relative comparison between the two paradigms, simultaneously taking into account the sample size, policy and reward class dimensions, and the regularization temperature. Moreover, we extend our analysis to the approximate optimization setting and derive exponentially decaying convergence rates for both RLHF and DPO. Next, we analyze the setting where the ground-truth reward is not realizable and find that, while RLHF incurs a constant additional error, DPO retains its asymptotically decaying gap by just tuning the temperature accordingly. Finally, we extend our comparison to the Markov decision process setting, where we generalize our results with exact optimization. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to provide such a comparative analysis for RLHF and DPO.
Read more6/6/2024