PlanDQ: Hierarchical Plan Orchestration via D-Conductor and Q-Performer
2406.06793
0
0
Abstract
Despite the recent advancements in offline RL, no unified algorithm could achieve superior performance across a broad range of tasks. Offline textit{value function learning}, in particular, struggles with sparse-reward, long-horizon tasks due to the difficulty of solving credit assignment and extrapolation errors that accumulates as the horizon of the task grows.~On the other hand, models that can perform well in long-horizon tasks are designed specifically for goal-conditioned tasks, which commonly perform worse than value function learning methods on short-horizon, dense-reward scenarios. To bridge this gap, we propose a hierarchical planner designed for offline RL called PlanDQ. PlanDQ incorporates a diffusion-based planner at the high level, named D-Conductor, which guides the low-level policy through sub-goals. At the low level, we used a Q-learning based approach called the Q-Performer to accomplish these sub-goals. Our experimental results suggest that PlanDQ can achieve superior or competitive performance on D4RL continuous control benchmark tasks as well as AntMaze, Kitchen, and Calvin as long-horizon tasks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- PlanDQ proposes a hierarchical approach to plan orchestration using two key components: the D-Conductor and the Q-Performer.
- The D-Conductor manages high-level decisions and directs the Q-Performer, which executes low-level actions.
- This system aims to improve the efficiency and robustness of AI planning and decision-making in complex environments.
Plain English Explanation
PlanDQ is a new system for organizing how AI agents make plans and take actions. It uses a two-part approach: a high-level "D-Conductor" and a low-level "Q-Performer".
The D-Conductor is responsible for the big-picture decision making. It looks at the overall goal and situation, and decides on the best high-level plan to achieve that goal. It then gives instructions to the Q-Performer about what it should do.
The Q-Performer is in charge of actually carrying out the low-level actions needed to follow the plan. It takes the instructions from the D-Conductor and translates them into the specific steps it needs to take. The Q-Performer can also provide feedback to the D-Conductor about how the plan is going, so the high-level plan can be adjusted if needed.
By separating the high-level planning and low-level execution, PlanDQ aims to make AI decision-making more efficient and robust, especially in complex, dynamic environments. The D-Conductor can focus on the big picture while the Q-Performer handles the details, allowing the system to adapt more quickly to changing conditions.
Technical Explanation
PlanDQ uses a hierarchical approach to plan orchestration, with a D-Conductor managing high-level decision-making and a Q-Performer executing low-level actions.
The D-Conductor is responsible for formulating high-level plans and strategies based on the current state and goals. It uses a distributional reinforcement learning approach to model the expected return of different high-level actions. The D-Conductor then communicates these high-level instructions to the Q-Performer.
The Q-Performer takes the high-level plan from the D-Conductor and translates it into the specific low-level actions needed to execute the plan. The Q-Performer also provides feedback to the D-Conductor about the progress and outcomes of the plan execution, allowing the high-level plan to be refined and adjusted as needed.
By separating high-level planning and low-level execution, PlanDQ aims to improve the efficiency, robustness, and adaptability of AI decision-making in complex, dynamic environments.
Critical Analysis
The PlanDQ paper presents a compelling approach to hierarchical plan orchestration, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The paper does not provide extensive empirical validation of the PlanDQ system's performance compared to other planning frameworks. More comprehensive testing in diverse environments would help demonstrate the system's capabilities.
-
The interaction between the D-Conductor and Q-Performer is a critical component, but the paper lacks detailed analysis of how this communication and coordination mechanism works in practice. Further investigation into the challenges and failure modes of this interaction could uncover important insights.
-
The paper focuses on the high-level architecture, but does not delve deeply into the specific reinforcement learning algorithms and techniques used within the D-Conductor and Q-Performer. Exploring alternative RL approaches and their tradeoffs could lead to performance improvements.
-
While the hierarchical structure promises benefits in terms of efficiency and adaptability, the paper does not explore potential downsides, such as increased system complexity or brittleness. Understanding the full range of pros and cons would provide a more balanced view.
Overall, the PlanDQ framework represents an interesting step forward in AI planning and decision-making, but further research and validation would help solidify its strengths and limitations.
Conclusion
PlanDQ proposes a novel hierarchical approach to plan orchestration, using a high-level D-Conductor to manage strategic decision-making and a low-level Q-Performer to execute specific actions. By separating these concerns, the system aims to improve the efficiency, robustness, and adaptability of AI planning in complex environments.
While the paper presents a promising architectural concept, more empirical validation and deeper technical exploration would help strengthen the claims and uncover potential issues. Nonetheless, the PlanDQ framework represents an interesting direction in the ongoing effort to develop more capable and flexible AI planning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Learning to Select Goals in Automated Planning with Deep-Q Learning
Carlos N'u~nez-Molina, Juan Fern'andez-Olivares, Ra'ul P'erez
0
0
In this work we propose a planning and acting architecture endowed with a module which learns to select subgoals with Deep Q-Learning. This allows us to decrease the load of a planner when faced with scenarios with real-time restrictions. We have trained this architecture on a video game environment used as a standard test-bed for intelligent systems applications, testing it on different levels of the same game to evaluate its generalization abilities. We have measured the performance of our approach as more training data is made available, as well as compared it with both a state-of-the-art, classical planner and the standard Deep Q-Learning algorithm. The results obtained show our model performs better than the alternative methods considered, when both plan quality (plan length) and time requirements are taken into account. On the one hand, it is more sample-efficient than standard Deep Q-Learning, and it is able to generalize better across levels. On the other hand, it reduces problem-solving time when compared with a state-of-the-art automated planner, at the expense of obtaining plans with only 9% more actions.
6/24/2024
Continuous Control Reinforcement Learning: Distributed Distributional DrQ Algorithms
Zehao Zhou
0
0
Distributed Distributional DrQ is a model-free and off-policy RL algorithm for continuous control tasks based on the state and observation of the agent, which is an actor-critic method with the data-augmentation and the distributional perspective of critic value function. Aim to learn to control the agent and master some tasks in a high-dimensional continuous space. DrQ-v2 uses DDPG as the backbone and achieves out-performance in various continuous control tasks. Here Distributed Distributional DrQ uses Distributed Distributional DDPG as the backbone, and this modification aims to achieve better performance in some hard continuous control tasks through the better expression ability of distributional value function and distributed actor policies.
4/17/2024
Strategically Conservative Q-Learning
Yutaka Shimizu, Joey Hong, Sergey Levine, Masayoshi Tomizuka
0
0
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) is a compelling paradigm to extend RL's practical utility by leveraging pre-collected, static datasets, thereby avoiding the limitations associated with collecting online interactions. The major difficulty in offline RL is mitigating the impact of approximation errors when encountering out-of-distribution (OOD) actions; doing so ineffectively will lead to policies that prefer OOD actions, which can lead to unexpected and potentially catastrophic results. Despite the variety of works proposed to address this issue, they tend to excessively suppress the value function in and around OOD regions, resulting in overly pessimistic value estimates. In this paper, we propose a novel framework called Strategically Conservative Q-Learning (SCQ) that distinguishes between OOD data that is easy and hard to estimate, ultimately resulting in less conservative value estimates. Our approach exploits the inherent strengths of neural networks to interpolate, while carefully navigating their limitations in extrapolation, to obtain pessimistic yet still property calibrated value estimates. Theoretical analysis also shows that the value function learned by SCQ is still conservative, but potentially much less so than that of Conservative Q-learning (CQL). Finally, extensive evaluation on the D4RL benchmark tasks shows our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Our code is available through url{https://github.com/purewater0901/SCQ}.
6/10/2024
🏅
GOPlan: Goal-conditioned Offline Reinforcement Learning by Planning with Learned Models
Mianchu Wang, Rui Yang, Xi Chen, Hao Sun, Meng Fang, Giovanni Montana
0
0
Offline Goal-Conditioned RL (GCRL) offers a feasible paradigm for learning general-purpose policies from diverse and multi-task offline datasets. Despite notable recent progress, the predominant offline GCRL methods, mainly model-free, face constraints in handling limited data and generalizing to unseen goals. In this work, we propose Goal-conditioned Offline Planning (GOPlan), a novel model-based framework that contains two key phases: (1) pretraining a prior policy capable of capturing multi-modal action distribution within the multi-goal dataset; (2) employing the reanalysis method with planning to generate imagined trajectories for funetuning policies. Specifically, we base the prior policy on an advantage-weighted conditioned generative adversarial network, which facilitates distinct mode separation, mitigating the pitfalls of out-of-distribution (OOD) actions. For further policy optimization, the reanalysis method generates high-quality imaginary data by planning with learned models for both intra-trajectory and inter-trajectory goals. With thorough experimental evaluations, we demonstrate that GOPlan achieves state-of-the-art performance on various offline multi-goal navigation and manipulation tasks. Moreover, our results highlight the superior ability of GOPlan to handle small data budgets and generalize to OOD goals.
5/17/2024