PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores a new type of attack called "knowledge poisoning" against retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models, which are large language models that use information retrieval to enhance their output.
- The attack involves injecting poisoned data into the retrieval index, causing the model to generate content influenced by the poisoned information.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this attack and propose mitigation strategies to make RAG models more robust.
Plain English Explanation
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models are a type of large language model that can enhance their output by retrieving relevant information from a database. These models are designed to produce more informative and coherent text by combining their language understanding capabilities with external knowledge.
However, the paper introduces a new attack called "knowledge poisoning" that can exploit the vulnerability of RAG models. The attackers can inject malicious data into the retrieval index, causing the model to incorporate this poisoned information into its generated output. This could lead to the model producing content that is biased, factually incorrect, or even harmful.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this attack through various experiments and propose several mitigation strategies to make RAG models more robust against this type of threat. These strategies include techniques like data filtering, adversarial training, and retrieval verification.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides background on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models, which use an information retrieval system to augment the input to a language model. This allows the model to leverage external knowledge to generate more informative and coherent text.
The researchers then introduce the "knowledge poisoning" attack, which involves injecting malicious data into the retrieval index used by the RAG model. This can cause the model to incorporate the poisoned information into its generated output, leading to biased, factually incorrect, or even harmful content.
The paper describes several experiments that demonstrate the effectiveness of this attack on different RAG models and datasets. The authors show that the attack can significantly degrade the performance of the models, even with a relatively small amount of poisoned data.
To mitigate the impact of this attack, the paper proposes several defense strategies, including data filtering, adversarial training, and retrieval verification. These techniques aim to make RAG models more robust to the injection of poisoned information into the retrieval index.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that the knowledge poisoning attack is a significant threat to the reliability and safety of RAG models. The authors note that this type of attack could be particularly concerning in applications where the models are used to provide information or make decisions that impact people's lives.
While the proposed mitigation strategies show promise, the paper also highlights that further research is needed to fully address the vulnerabilities of RAG models. For example, the authors suggest that more work is needed to develop robust retrieval systems that can better detect and filter out poisoned information.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential for this attack to be used maliciously by bad actors. It would be valuable to consider the broader societal implications and potential misuse of this type of vulnerability.
Conclusion
The paper presents a critical analysis of the security and reliability of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models, highlighting a new attack called "knowledge poisoning" that can significantly degrade the performance of these models.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this attack and propose several mitigation strategies to make RAG models more robust. However, the paper also acknowledges the need for further research to fully address the vulnerabilities of these models, particularly in the context of their real-world applications and potential for misuse.
Overall, this work underscores the importance of developing secure and reliable AI systems, as the widespread adoption of large language models like RAG could have significant implications for individuals and society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
Wei Zou, Runpeng Geng, Binghui Wang, Jinyuan Jia
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success due to their exceptional generative capabilities. Despite their success, they also have inherent limitations such as a lack of up-to-date knowledge and hallucination. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a state-of-the-art technique to mitigate these limitations. The key idea of RAG is to ground the answer generation of an LLM on external knowledge retrieved from a knowledge database. Existing studies mainly focus on improving the accuracy or efficiency of RAG, leaving its security largely unexplored. We aim to bridge the gap in this work. We find that the knowledge database in a RAG system introduces a new and practical attack surface. Based on this attack surface, we propose PoisonedRAG, the first knowledge corruption attack to RAG, where an attacker could inject a few malicious texts into the knowledge database of a RAG system to induce an LLM to generate an attacker-chosen target answer for an attacker-chosen target question. We formulate knowledge corruption attacks as an optimization problem, whose solution is a set of malicious texts. Depending on the background knowledge (e.g., black-box and white-box settings) of an attacker on a RAG system, we propose two solutions to solve the optimization problem, respectively. Our results show PoisonedRAG could achieve a 90% attack success rate when injecting five malicious texts for each target question into a knowledge database with millions of texts. We also evaluate several defenses and our results show they are insufficient to defend against PoisonedRAG, highlighting the need for new defenses.
Read more8/14/2024
0
BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
Jiaqi Xue, Mengxin Zheng, Yebowen Hu, Fei Liu, Xun Chen, Qian Lou
Large Language Models (LLMs) are constrained by outdated information and a tendency to generate incorrect data, commonly referred to as hallucinations. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses these limitations by combining the strengths of retrieval-based methods and generative models. This approach involves retrieving relevant information from a large, up-to-date dataset and using it to enhance the generation process, leading to more accurate and contextually appropriate responses. Despite its benefits, RAG introduces a new attack surface for LLMs, particularly because RAG databases are often sourced from public data, such as the web. In this paper, we propose TrojRAG{} to identify the vulnerabilities and attacks on retrieval parts (RAG database) and their indirect attacks on generative parts (LLMs). Specifically, we identify that poisoning several customized content passages could achieve a retrieval backdoor, where the retrieval works well for clean queries but always returns customized poisoned adversarial queries. Triggers and poisoned passages can be highly customized to implement various attacks. For example, a trigger could be a semantic group like The Republican Party, Donald Trump, etc. Adversarial passages can be tailored to different contents, not only linked to the triggers but also used to indirectly attack generative LLMs without modifying them. These attacks can include denial-of-service attacks on RAG and semantic steering attacks on LLM generations conditioned by the triggers. Our experiments demonstrate that by just poisoning 10 adversarial passages can induce 98.2% success rate to retrieve the adversarial passages. Then, these passages can increase the reject ratio of RAG-based GPT-4 from 0.01% to 74.6% or increase the rate of negative responses from 0.22% to 72% for targeted queries.
Read more6/7/2024
0
Phantom: General Trigger Attacks on Retrieval Augmented Language Generation
Harsh Chaudhari, Giorgio Severi, John Abascal, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Milad Nasr, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Alina Oprea
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) expands the capabilities of modern large language models (LLMs) in chatbot applications, enabling developers to adapt and personalize the LLM output without expensive training or fine-tuning. RAG systems use an external knowledge database to retrieve the most relevant documents for a given query, providing this context to the LLM generator. While RAG achieves impressive utility in many applications, its adoption to enable personalized generative models introduces new security risks. In this work, we propose new attack surfaces for an adversary to compromise a victim's RAG system, by injecting a single malicious document in its knowledge database. We design Phantom, general two-step attack framework against RAG augmented LLMs. The first step involves crafting a poisoned document designed to be retrieved by the RAG system within the top-k results only when an adversarial trigger, a specific sequence of words acting as backdoor, is present in the victim's queries. In the second step, a specially crafted adversarial string within the poisoned document triggers various adversarial attacks in the LLM generator, including denial of service, reputation damage, privacy violations, and harmful behaviors. We demonstrate our attacks on multiple LLM architectures, including Gemma, Vicuna, and Llama.
Read more6/3/2024
0
Black-Box Opinion Manipulation Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
Zhuo Chen, Jiawei Liu, Haotan Liu, Qikai Cheng, Fan Zhang, Wei Lu, Xiaozhong Liu
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is applied to solve hallucination problems and real-time constraints of large language models, but it also induces vulnerabilities against retrieval corruption attacks. Existing research mainly explores the unreliability of RAG in white-box and closed-domain QA tasks. In this paper, we aim to reveal the vulnerabilities of Retrieval-Enhanced Generative (RAG) models when faced with black-box attacks for opinion manipulation. We explore the impact of such attacks on user cognition and decision-making, providing new insight to enhance the reliability and security of RAG models. We manipulate the ranking results of the retrieval model in RAG with instruction and use these results as data to train a surrogate model. By employing adversarial retrieval attack methods to the surrogate model, black-box transfer attacks on RAG are further realized. Experiments conducted on opinion datasets across multiple topics show that the proposed attack strategy can significantly alter the opinion polarity of the content generated by RAG. This demonstrates the model's vulnerability and, more importantly, reveals the potential negative impact on user cognition and decision-making, making it easier to mislead users into accepting incorrect or biased information.
Read more7/19/2024