Political DEBATE: Efficient Zero-shot and Few-shot Classifiers for Political Text
0
🌿
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides an overview of the data sources used in the research.
- It covers the key datasets and external resources leveraged for the analysis.
- The data sources are discussed in detail to provide context for the research methodology and findings.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this study used several different datasets and information sources to conduct their analysis. This section provides an overview of the key data used in the paper. They pulled data from a variety of online sources, including news articles, social media posts, and government records. This allowed them to examine different perspectives and types of information related to the research topic. Understanding the data sources is important for evaluating the reliability and representativeness of the findings presented in the paper.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes the main data sources used in the research:
Appendix A outlines the datasets and external resources leveraged for the analysis. This includes online news articles, social media posts, government records, and other publicly available information. The researchers compiled these diverse data sources to capture a range of perspectives and information relevant to the research topic.
The paper provides details on the specific datasets, including their sizes, time periods covered, and other key characteristics. This contextual information is important for understanding the scope and limitations of the data used in the experiments.
Critical Analysis
The researchers made a concerted effort to gather a comprehensive set of data from multiple sources to support their analysis. However, the paper does not discuss potential biases or gaps in the data, which could impact the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper does not provide much detail on how the data was preprocessed or filtered, which could also affect the reliability of the results. More transparency around these data curation and processing steps would be helpful for evaluating the soundness of the methodology.
Conclusion
This paper provides a detailed overview of the data sources used to support the researchers' analysis and findings. The diverse set of online news, social media, and government data sources allowed the team to examine the research topic from multiple angles. However, the paper could be strengthened by addressing potential biases or limitations in the data, as well as providing more information on the data preprocessing steps. Overall, the data sources appear to be comprehensive and appropriate for the research goals.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
0
Political DEBATE: Efficient Zero-shot and Few-shot Classifiers for Political Text
Michael Burnham, Kayla Kahn, Ryan Yank Wang, Rachel X. Peng
Social scientists quickly adopted large language models due to their ability to annotate documents without supervised training, an ability known as zero-shot learning. However, due to their compute demands, cost, and often proprietary nature, these models are often at odds with replication and open science standards. This paper introduces the Political DEBATE (DeBERTa Algorithm for Textual Entailment) language models for zero-shot and few-shot classification of political documents. These models are not only as good, or better than, state-of-the art large language models at zero and few-shot classification, but are orders of magnitude more efficient and completely open source. By training the models on a simple random sample of 10-25 documents, they can outperform supervised classifiers trained on hundreds or thousands of documents and state-of-the-art generative models with complex, engineered prompts. Additionally, we release the PolNLI dataset used to train these models -- a corpus of over 200,000 political documents with highly accurate labels across over 800 classification tasks.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Deciphering Political Entity Sentiment in News with Large Language Models: Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Strategies
Alapan Kuila, Sudeshna Sarkar
Sentiment analysis plays a pivotal role in understanding public opinion, particularly in the political domain where the portrayal of entities in news articles influences public perception. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in predicting entity-specific sentiment from political news articles. Leveraging zero-shot and few-shot strategies, we explore the capability of LLMs to discern sentiment towards political entities in news content. Employing a chain-of-thought (COT) approach augmented with rationale in few-shot in-context learning, we assess whether this method enhances sentiment prediction accuracy. Our evaluation on sentiment-labeled datasets demonstrates that LLMs, outperform fine-tuned BERT models in capturing entity-specific sentiment. We find that learning in-context significantly improves model performance, while the self-consistency mechanism enhances consistency in sentiment prediction. Despite the promising results, we observe inconsistencies in the effectiveness of the COT prompting method. Overall, our findings underscore the potential of LLMs in entity-centric sentiment analysis within the political news domain and highlight the importance of suitable prompting strategies and model architectures.
Read more4/9/2024
0
PoliPrompt: A High-Performance Cost-Effective LLM-Based Text Classification Framework for Political Science
Menglin Liu, Ge Shi
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have opened new avenues for enhancing text classification efficiency in political science, surpassing traditional machine learning methods that often require extensive feature engineering, human labeling, and task-specific training. However, their effectiveness in achieving high classification accuracy remains questionable. This paper introduces a three-stage in-context learning approach that leverages LLMs to improve classification accuracy while minimizing experimental costs. Our method incorporates automatic enhanced prompt generation, adaptive exemplar selection, and a consensus mechanism that resolves discrepancies between two weaker LLMs, refined by an advanced LLM. We validate our approach using datasets from the BBC news reports, Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation, and 2018 election campaign ads. The results show significant improvements in classification F1 score (+0.36 for zero-shot classification) with manageable economic costs (-78% compared with human labeling), demonstrating that our method effectively addresses the limitations of traditional machine learning while offering a scalable and reliable solution for text analysis in political science.
Read more9/4/2024
🏷️
0
Leveraging Codebook Knowledge with NLI and ChatGPT for Zero-Shot Political Relation Classification
Yibo Hu, Erick Skorupa Parolin, Latifur Khan, Patrick T. Brandt, Javier Osorio, Vito J. D'Orazio
Is it possible accurately classify political relations within evolving event ontologies without extensive annotations? This study investigates zero-shot learning methods that use expert knowledge from existing annotation codebook, and evaluates the performance of advanced ChatGPT (GPT-3.5/4) and a natural language inference (NLI)-based model called ZSP. ChatGPT uses codebook's labeled summaries as prompts, whereas ZSP breaks down the classification task into context, event mode, and class disambiguation to refine task-specific hypotheses. This decomposition enhances interpretability, efficiency, and adaptability to schema changes. The experiments reveal ChatGPT's strengths and limitations, and crucially show ZSP's outperformance of dictionary-based methods and its competitive edge over some supervised models. These findings affirm the value of ZSP for validating event records and advancing ontology development. Our study underscores the efficacy of leveraging transfer learning and existing domain expertise to enhance research efficiency and scalability.
Read more6/7/2024