PolygloToxicityPrompts: Multilingual Evaluation of Neural Toxic Degeneration in Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2405.09373 - Published 8/13/2024 by Devansh Jain, Priyanshu Kumar, Samuel Gehman, Xuhui Zhou, Thomas Hartvigsen, Maarten Sap
Total Score

0

PolygloToxicityPrompts: Multilingual Evaluation of Neural Toxic Degeneration in Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper, titled "PolygloToxicityPrompts: Multilingual Evaluation of Neural Toxic Degeneration in Large Language Models," examines the ability of large language models to detect and mitigate toxic content in multiple languages.
  • The researchers investigate the performance of language models in identifying and classifying toxic language across a diverse set of languages, including English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Russian, and Mandarin Chinese.
  • The paper also explores methods for mitigating the generation of toxic content by these models, and provides insights into the challenges of building robust toxicity detectors for a multilingual landscape.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models are powerful artificial intelligence systems that can generate human-like text. However, these models can also sometimes produce content that is toxic, offensive, or undesirable. This is a significant concern, as these models are being increasingly used in various applications, from chatbots to content generation.

In this paper, the researchers investigate how well these language models can detect and classify toxic content across multiple languages, including English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Russian, and Mandarin Chinese. They use a variety of techniques, including prompts designed to elicit toxic responses, to assess the models' capabilities.

The researchers also explore methods for mitigating the generation of toxic content by these models, such as fine-tuning the models on less toxic data or modifying the training process. This is an important step in ensuring that these powerful AI systems are used responsibly and do not cause harm.

The findings of this study have significant implications for the development and deployment of large language models, particularly in multilingual and global contexts. The researchers provide insights into the challenges of building robust toxicity detectors that can work across different languages and cultural contexts, and highlight the need for ongoing research and innovation in this area.

Technical Explanation

The paper "PolygloToxicityPrompts: Multilingual Evaluation of Neural Toxic Degeneration in Large Language Models" presents a comprehensive study on the ability of large language models to detect and mitigate toxic content in multiple languages.

The researchers first developed a dataset of toxic prompts in seven languages (English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Russian, and Mandarin Chinese) to assess the performance of language models in identifying and classifying toxic language. These prompts were designed to elicit toxic responses from the models, allowing the researchers to evaluate their capabilities in a controlled setting.

The researchers then tested several state-of-the-art language models, including GPT-3, BERT, and XLM-R, on the toxic prompt dataset. They analyzed the models' ability to correctly classify the prompts as toxic or non-toxic, as well as their tendency to generate toxic text in response to the prompts.

The findings of the study suggest that while the language models generally performed well in identifying toxic content, they also exhibited concerning tendencies to generate toxic text, particularly in response to certain prompts. The researchers observed that the models' performance varied across languages, highlighting the challenges of building robust toxicity detectors for a multilingual landscape.

To address these issues, the researchers explored methods for mitigating the generation of toxic content by the language models. They experimented with techniques such as fine-tuning the models on less toxic data and modifying the training process to discourage the generation of toxic text.

The insights gained from this research have significant implications for the development and deployment of large language models in real-world applications. The researchers emphasize the importance of ongoing research and innovation in this area to ensure that these powerful AI systems are used responsibly and do not cause harm, particularly in multilingual and global contexts.

Critical Analysis

The researchers in this paper have made a valuable contribution to the field of large language model research by exploring the crucial issue of toxic content detection and mitigation in a multilingual setting. The study's findings highlight the significant challenges that exist in building robust toxicity detectors that can work effectively across different languages and cultural contexts.

One of the key strengths of the paper is the researchers' use of a diverse set of languages in their evaluation, which allows them to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the problem. By including languages such as English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Russian, and Mandarin Chinese, the researchers have demonstrated the need for language-specific and culturally-aware approaches to tackling toxic content generation.

However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations of the study, such as the potential for bias in the creation of the toxic prompt dataset and the need for further research to address the challenges of mitigating the generation of toxic content in more nuanced and context-sensitive ways.

Additionally, while the paper provides valuable insights into the performance of existing language models in identifying and classifying toxic content, it would be interesting to see the researchers explore the potential of more advanced techniques, such as those used in toxicity classification for Ukrainian, to further improve the reliability and accuracy of these systems.

Overall, the "PolygloToxicityPrompts" paper is a well-designed and important study that highlights the critical need for continued research and development in the area of toxic content detection and mitigation in large language models. The findings and insights provided in this work will undoubtedly contribute to the ongoing efforts to build more robust and responsible AI systems that can be safely deployed in diverse real-world applications.

Conclusion

The "PolygloToxicityPrompts" paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the ability of large language models to detect and mitigate toxic content across multiple languages. The researchers' findings highlight the significant challenges that exist in building robust toxicity detectors for a multilingual landscape, and the need for continued research and innovation in this area.

The study's key contributions include the development of a diverse dataset of toxic prompts, the assessment of state-of-the-art language models' performance in identifying and classifying toxic content, and the exploration of methods for mitigating the generation of toxic text by these models.

The insights gained from this research have important implications for the responsible development and deployment of large language models in real-world applications, particularly in global and multilingual contexts. The researchers emphasize the need for language-specific and culturally-aware approaches to addressing the issue of toxic content, and the importance of ongoing efforts to build more robust and trustworthy AI systems that can be safely integrated into our daily lives.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

PolygloToxicityPrompts: Multilingual Evaluation of Neural Toxic Degeneration in Large Language Models
Total Score

0

PolygloToxicityPrompts: Multilingual Evaluation of Neural Toxic Degeneration in Large Language Models

Devansh Jain, Priyanshu Kumar, Samuel Gehman, Xuhui Zhou, Thomas Hartvigsen, Maarten Sap

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to their extensive global deployment, and ensuring their safety calls for comprehensive and multilingual toxicity evaluations. However, existing toxicity benchmarks are overwhelmingly focused on English, posing serious risks to deploying LLMs in other languages. We address this by introducing PolygloToxicityPrompts (PTP), the first large-scale multilingual toxicity evaluation benchmark of 425K naturally occurring prompts spanning 17 languages. We overcome the scarcity of naturally occurring toxicity in web-text and ensure coverage across languages with varying resources by automatically scraping over 100M web-text documents. Using PTP, we investigate research questions to study the impact of model size, prompt language, and instruction and preference-tuning methods on toxicity by benchmarking over 60 LLMs. Notably, we find that toxicity increases as language resources decrease or model size increases. Although instruction- and preference-tuning reduce toxicity, the choice of preference-tuning method does not have any significant impact. Our findings shed light on crucial shortcomings of LLM safeguarding and highlight areas for future research.

Read more

8/13/2024

RTP-LX: Can LLMs Evaluate Toxicity in Multilingual Scenarios?
Total Score

0

RTP-LX: Can LLMs Evaluate Toxicity in Multilingual Scenarios?

Adrian de Wynter, Ishaan Watts, Nektar Ege Alt{i}ntoprak, Tua Wongsangaroonsri, Minghui Zhang, Noura Farra, Lena Baur, Samantha Claudet, Pavel Gajdusek, Can Goren, Qilong Gu, Anna Kaminska, Tomasz Kaminski, Ruby Kuo, Akiko Kyuba, Jongho Lee, Kartik Mathur, Petter Merok, Ivana Milovanovi'c, Nani Paananen, Vesa-Matti Paananen, Anna Pavlenko, Bruno Pereira Vidal, Luciano Strika, Yueh Tsao, Davide Turcato, Oleksandr Vakhno, Judit Velcsov, Anna Vickers, St'ephanie Visser, Herdyan Widarmanto, Andrey Zaikin, Si-Qing Chen

Large language models (LLMs) and small language models (SLMs) are being adopted at remarkable speed, although their safety still remains a serious concern. With the advent of multilingual S/LLMs, the question now becomes a matter of scale: can we expand multilingual safety evaluations of these models with the same velocity at which they are deployed? To this end we introduce RTP-LX, a human-transcreated and human-annotated corpus of toxic prompts and outputs in 28 languages. RTP-LX follows participatory design practices, and a portion of the corpus is especially designed to detect culturally-specific toxic language. We evaluate seven S/LLMs on their ability to detect toxic content in a culturally-sensitive, multilingual scenario. We find that, although they typically score acceptably in terms of accuracy, they have low agreement with human judges when judging holistically the toxicity of a prompt, and have difficulty discerning harm in context-dependent scenarios, particularly with subtle-yet-harmful content (e.g. microagressions, bias). We release of this dataset to contribute to further reduce harmful uses of these models and improve their safe deployment.

Read more

4/23/2024

Realistic Evaluation of Toxicity in Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Realistic Evaluation of Toxicity in Large Language Models

Tinh Son Luong, Thanh-Thien Le, Linh Ngo Van, Thien Huu Nguyen

Large language models (LLMs) have become integral to our professional workflows and daily lives. Nevertheless, these machine companions of ours have a critical flaw: the huge amount of data which endows them with vast and diverse knowledge, also exposes them to the inevitable toxicity and bias. While most LLMs incorporate defense mechanisms to prevent the generation of harmful content, these safeguards can be easily bypassed with minimal prompt engineering. In this paper, we introduce the new Thoroughly Engineered Toxicity (TET) dataset, comprising manually crafted prompts designed to nullify the protective layers of such models. Through extensive evaluations, we demonstrate the pivotal role of TET in providing a rigorous benchmark for evaluation of toxicity awareness in several popular LLMs: it highlights the toxicity in the LLMs that might remain hidden when using normal prompts, thus revealing subtler issues in their behavior.

Read more

5/21/2024

From One to Many: Expanding the Scope of Toxicity Mitigation in Language Models
Total Score

0

From One to Many: Expanding the Scope of Toxicity Mitigation in Language Models

Luiza Pozzobon, Patrick Lewis, Sara Hooker, Beyza Ermis

To date, toxicity mitigation in language models has almost entirely been focused on single-language settings. As language models embrace multilingual capabilities, it's crucial our safety measures keep pace. Recognizing this research gap, our approach expands the scope of conventional toxicity mitigation to address the complexities presented by multiple languages. In the absence of sufficient annotated datasets across languages, we employ translated data to evaluate and enhance our mitigation techniques. We also compare finetuning mitigation approaches against retrieval-augmented techniques under both static and continual toxicity mitigation scenarios. This allows us to examine the effects of translation quality and the cross-lingual transfer on toxicity mitigation. We also explore how model size and data quantity affect the success of these mitigation efforts. Covering nine languages, our study represents a broad array of linguistic families and levels of resource availability, ranging from high to mid-resource languages. Through comprehensive experiments, we provide insights into the complexities of multilingual toxicity mitigation, offering valuable insights and paving the way for future research in this increasingly important field. Code and data are available at https://github.com/for-ai/goodtriever.

Read more

5/31/2024