The Potential and Perils of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the potential benefits and risks of using generative artificial intelligence (AI) for healthcare quality improvement and patient safety.
- Generative AI models like GPT-3 have shown impressive capabilities in generating human-like text, which could be leveraged to automate tasks like clinical note writing, patient education materials, and treatment plan documentation.
- However, the use of generative AI in healthcare also raises concerns around safety, reliability, and ethical challenges that must be carefully considered.
Plain English Explanation
Generative AI models are a type of artificial intelligence that can create new, human-like text, images, or other content. The paper examines how these models could potentially be used to improve the quality of healthcare and make patient care safer.
For example, generative AI could be used to automatically generate clinical notes based on a doctor's interactions with a patient, or to create patient education materials in easy-to-understand language. This could save healthcare providers time and ensure consistency in record-keeping and communication.
However, the paper also highlights the risks and challenges of using generative AI in a sensitive domain like healthcare. There are concerns about the reliability and safety of AI-generated content, as well as ethical issues around transparency, accountability, and patient privacy.
The paper emphasizes the need for careful evaluation and responsible development of generative AI systems to harness the potential benefits while mitigating the risks. Systematic reviews of the applications and implications of generative AI in healthcare can help guide this process.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the potential applications and perils of using generative AI models for healthcare quality improvement and patient safety. Generative AI, exemplified by language models like GPT-3, have demonstrated a remarkable ability to generate human-like text across a wide range of domains.
The authors discuss how these capabilities could be leveraged to automate various healthcare tasks, such as generating clinical notes, creating patient education materials, and documenting treatment plans. This could potentially improve efficiency, consistency, and accessibility in healthcare delivery.
However, the paper also highlights the significant risks and challenges involved in using generative AI in the healthcare domain. There are concerns about the reliability and safety of AI-generated content, as well as ethical issues around transparency, accountability, and patient privacy.
The authors emphasize the need for a systematic and rigorous evaluation of the use of generative AI in healthcare, considering both the potential benefits and the associated risks. They call for the development of responsible and ethical frameworks to guide the implementation of these technologies in healthcare settings.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a balanced and comprehensive overview of the potential benefits and risks of using generative AI in healthcare. While the authors acknowledge the impressive capabilities of generative AI models, they rightly emphasize the need for cautious and responsible development and deployment of these technologies in the sensitive domain of healthcare.
One key limitation highlighted in the paper is the reliability and safety of AI-generated content, which could have serious consequences in a medical context. The authors also raise valid concerns around transparency, accountability, and patient privacy, which must be carefully addressed.
Additionally, the paper calls for a systematic and rigorous evaluation of the use of generative AI in healthcare, which is crucial to ensure that the potential benefits are realized while the risks are effectively mitigated. The development of ethical frameworks to guide the implementation of these technologies is also a vital step.
Overall, the paper presents a well-reasoned and thoughtful analysis of the complex issues surrounding the use of generative AI in healthcare. It serves as a valuable resource for healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers interested in exploring the opportunities and challenges in this rapidly evolving field.
Conclusion
The paper highlights the potential benefits of using generative AI to enhance healthcare quality and patient safety, such as automating clinical documentation and improving patient education. However, it also emphasizes the significant risks and challenges that must be carefully addressed, including concerns around reliability, safety, transparency, and ethics.
The authors argue for a systematic and rigorous evaluation of generative AI in healthcare, along with the development of ethical frameworks to guide its responsible implementation. This balanced approach underscores the need for healthcare organizations, policymakers, and researchers to work together to harness the power of these technologies while prioritizing patient well-being and safety.
As generative AI continues to advance, the insights and recommendations provided in this paper will be crucial in ensuring that these tools are deployed in a way that truly benefits the healthcare system and the patients it serves.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
The Potential and Perils of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety
Laleh Jalilian, Daniel McDuff, Achuta Kadambi
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has the potential to improve healthcare through automation that enhances the quality and safety of patient care. Powered by foundation models that have been pretrained and can generate complex content, GenAI represents a paradigm shift away from the more traditional focus on task-specific classifiers that have dominated the AI landscape thus far. We posit that the imminent application of GenAI in healthcare will be through well-defined, low risk, high value, and narrow applications that automate healthcare workflows at the point of care using smaller foundation models. These models will be finetuned for different capabilities and application specific scenarios and will have the ability to provide medical explanations, reference evidence within a retrieval augmented framework and utilizing external tools. We contrast this with a general, all-purpose AI model for end-to-end clinical decision making that improves clinician performance, including safety-critical diagnostic tasks, which will require greater research prior to implementation. We consider areas where 'human in the loop' Generative AI can improve healthcare quality and safety by automating mundane tasks. Using the principles of implementation science will be critical for integrating 'end to end' GenAI systems that will be accepted by healthcare teams.
Read more7/25/2024
🤖
0
Generative AI for Health Technology Assessment: Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Considerations
Rachael Fleurence, Jiang Bian, Xiaoyan Wang, Hua Xu, Dalia Dawoud, Mitch Higashi, Jagpreet Chhatwal
This review introduces the transformative potential of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and foundation models, including large language models (LLMs), for health technology assessment (HTA). We explore their applications in four critical areas, evidence synthesis, evidence generation, clinical trials and economic modeling: (1) Evidence synthesis: Generative AI has the potential to assist in automating literature reviews and meta-analyses by proposing search terms, screening abstracts, and extracting data with notable accuracy; (2) Evidence generation: These models can potentially facilitate automating the process and analyze the increasingly available large collections of real-world data (RWD), including unstructured clinical notes and imaging, enhancing the speed and quality of real-world evidence (RWE) generation; (3) Clinical trials: Generative AI can be used to optimize trial design, improve patient matching, and manage trial data more efficiently; and (4) Economic modeling: Generative AI can also aid in the development of health economic models, from conceptualization to validation, thus streamlining the overall HTA process. Despite their promise, these technologies, while rapidly improving, are still nascent and continued careful evaluation in their applications to HTA is required. To ensure their responsible use and implementation, both developers and users of research incorporating these tools, should familiarize themselves with their current limitations, including the issues related to scientific validity, risk of bias, and consider equity and ethical implications. We also surveyed the current policy landscape and provide suggestions for HTA agencies on responsibly integrating generative AI into their workflows, emphasizing the importance of human oversight and the fast-evolving nature of these tools.
Read more8/2/2024
🤖
0
Rapid Review of Generative AI in Smart Medical Applications
Yuan Sun, Jorge Ortiz
With the continuous advancement of technology, artificial intelligence has significantly impacted various fields, particularly healthcare. Generative models, a key AI technology, have revolutionized medical image generation, data analysis, and diagnosis. This article explores their application in intelligent medical devices. Generative models enhance diagnostic speed and accuracy, improving medical service quality and efficiency while reducing equipment costs. These models show great promise in medical image generation, data analysis, and diagnosis. Additionally, integrating generative models with IoT technology facilitates real-time data analysis and predictions, offering smarter healthcare services and aiding in telemedicine. Challenges include computational demands, ethical concerns, and scenario-specific limitations.
Read more6/12/2024
0
Human-AI Safety: A Descendant of Generative AI and Control Systems Safety
Andrea Bajcsy, Jaime F. Fisac
Artificial intelligence (AI) is interacting with people at an unprecedented scale, offering new avenues for immense positive impact, but also raising widespread concerns around the potential for individual and societal harm. Today, the predominant paradigm for human--AI safety focuses on fine-tuning the generative model's outputs to better agree with human-provided examples or feedback. In reality, however, the consequences of an AI model's outputs cannot be determined in isolation: they are tightly entangled with the responses and behavior of human users over time. In this paper, we distill key complementary lessons from AI safety and control systems safety, highlighting open challenges as well as key synergies between both fields. We then argue that meaningful safety assurances for advanced AI technologies require reasoning about how the feedback loop formed by AI outputs and human behavior may drive the interaction towards different outcomes. To this end, we introduce a unifying formalism to capture dynamic, safety-critical human--AI interactions and propose a concrete technical roadmap towards next-generation human-centered AI safety.
Read more6/26/2024