Potion: Towards Poison Unlearning

Read original: arXiv:2406.09173 - Published 9/12/2024 by Stefan Schoepf, Jack Foster, Alexandra Brintrup

Overview

This paper proposes "Potion", a method for "unlearning" the effects of poisoning attacks on machine learning models.
Poisoning attacks involve injecting malicious data into the training process, causing the model to learn unwanted behaviors.
Potion aims to undo the impact of these attacks, allowing the model to "forget" the poisoned data and learn the intended behavior.

Plain English Explanation

Potion: Towards Poison Unlearning describes a technique to undo the damage caused by "poisoning attacks" on machine learning models. Poisoning attacks occur when someone intentionally adds misleading data to a model's training process, causing the model to learn unintended or harmful behaviors.

Potion provides a way to "unlearn" the effects of these poisoning attacks. The key idea is to identify the specific parts of the model that were corrupted by the poisoned data, and then selectively "forget" or "unlearn" those parts. This allows the model to revert to its original, intended behavior, as if the poisoned data had never been introduced.

The paper demonstrates how Potion can be effective at undoing the impact of poisoning attacks on various types of machine learning models, including those trained on complex, high-dimensional data. This is an important advance, as poisoning attacks are a significant threat to the reliability and security of AI systems in the real world.

Technical Explanation

Potion: Towards Poison Unlearning introduces a technique called "Potion" that aims to "unlearn" the effects of poisoning attacks on machine learning models. Poisoning attacks involve injecting malicious data into the training process, causing the model to learn unintended behaviors.

The core idea behind Potion is to identify the specific parts of the model that were corrupted by the poisoned data, and then selectively "forget" or "unlearn" those parts. This is achieved through a two-step process:

Concept identification: The model's latent representations are analyzed to identify the "conceptual" components that were most impacted by the poisoned data.
Concept unlearning: These identified concepts are then selectively "unlearned" from the model, effectively removing the influence of the poisoned data.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of Potion on various machine learning tasks, including image classification and text classification. Notably, Potion is shown to be able to undo the impact of transferable availability poisoning attacks and universal data purification attacks, which are particularly challenging types of poisoning attacks.

Critical Analysis

The Potion approach presented in this paper is a promising step towards addressing the threat of poisoning attacks on machine learning models. By selectively "unlearning" the corrupted parts of a model, it provides a way to recover the model's intended behavior, even in the face of sophisticated poisoning attacks.

However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the concept identification step in Potion relies on the availability of clean, unpoisoned data, which may not always be possible in real-world scenarios. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential impact of unlearnable datasets, which could undermine the effectiveness of the Potion approach.

Furthermore, the SEEP framework suggests that the latent representations of machine learning models can be highly sensitive to small changes in the training data. This raises questions about the robustness and generalization of the Potion approach, as it relies on accurately identifying and selectively unlearning the corrupted components of the model.

Overall, the Potion method represents an important contribution to the field of machine learning security, but further research is needed to address its limitations and ensure its practical applicability in real-world scenarios.

Conclusion

Potion: Towards Poison Unlearning proposes a technique called Potion that aims to undo the impact of poisoning attacks on machine learning models. By selectively "unlearning" the corrupted parts of a model, Potion provides a way to recover the model's intended behavior, even in the face of sophisticated poisoning attacks.

While Potion represents an important advancement in the field of machine learning security, the paper also highlights several limitations and areas for further research. Addressing these challenges will be crucial for ensuring the reliability and security of AI systems in real-world applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Potion: Towards Poison Unlearning

Stefan Schoepf, Jack Foster, Alexandra Brintrup

Adversarial attacks by malicious actors on machine learning systems, such as introducing poison triggers into training datasets, pose significant risks. The challenge in resolving such an attack arises in practice when only a subset of the poisoned data can be identified. This necessitates the development of methods to remove, i.e. unlearn, poison triggers from already trained models with only a subset of the poison data available. The requirements for this task significantly deviate from privacy-focused unlearning where all of the data to be forgotten by the model is known. Previous work has shown that the undiscovered poisoned samples lead to a failure of established unlearning methods, with only one method, Selective Synaptic Dampening (SSD), showing limited success. Even full retraining, after the removal of the identified poison, cannot address this challenge as the undiscovered poison samples lead to a reintroduction of the poison trigger in the model. Our work addresses two key challenges to advance the state of the art in poison unlearning. First, we introduce a novel outlier-resistant method, based on SSD, that significantly improves model protection and unlearning performance. Second, we introduce Poison Trigger Neutralisation (PTN) search, a fast, parallelisable, hyperparameter search that utilises the characteristic unlearning versus model protection trade-off to find suitable hyperparameters in settings where the forget set size is unknown and the retain set is contaminated. We benchmark our contributions using ResNet-9 on CIFAR10 and WideResNet-28x10 on CIFAR100. Experimental results show that our method heals 93.72% of poison compared to SSD with 83.41% and full retraining with 40.68%. We achieve this while also lowering the average model accuracy drop caused by unlearning from 5.68% (SSD) to 1.41% (ours).

9/12/2024

❗

Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attacks

Jimmy Z. Di, Jack Douglas, Jayadev Acharya, Gautam Kamath, Ayush Sekhari

We introduce camouflaged data poisoning attacks, a new attack vector that arises in the context of machine unlearning and other settings when model retraining may be induced. An adversary first adds a few carefully crafted points to the training dataset such that the impact on the model's predictions is minimal. The adversary subsequently triggers a request to remove a subset of the introduced points at which point the attack is unleashed and the model's predictions are negatively affected. In particular, we consider clean-label targeted attacks (in which the goal is to cause the model to misclassify a specific test point) on datasets including CIFAR-10, Imagenette, and Imagewoof. This attack is realized by constructing camouflage datapoints that mask the effect of a poisoned dataset.

8/2/2024

Class Machine Unlearning for Complex Data via Concepts Inference and Data Poisoning

Wenhan Chang, Tianqing Zhu, Heng Xu, Wenjian Liu, Wanlei Zhou

In current AI era, users may request AI companies to delete their data from the training dataset due to the privacy concerns. As a model owner, retraining a model will consume significant computational resources. Therefore, machine unlearning is a new emerged technology to allow model owner to delete requested training data or a class with little affecting on the model performance. However, for large-scaling complex data, such as image or text data, unlearning a class from a model leads to a inferior performance due to the difficulty to identify the link between classes and model. An inaccurate class deleting may lead to over or under unlearning. In this paper, to accurately defining the unlearning class of complex data, we apply the definition of Concept, rather than an image feature or a token of text data, to represent the semantic information of unlearning class. This new representation can cut the link between the model and the class, leading to a complete erasing of the impact of a class. To analyze the impact of the concept of complex data, we adopt a Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Model, and Integrated Gradients to precisely identify concepts across different classes. Next, we take advantage of data poisoning with random and targeted labels to propose unlearning methods. We test our methods on both image classification models and large language models (LLMs). The results consistently show that the proposed methods can accurately erase targeted information from models and can largely maintain the performance of the models.

5/27/2024

Releasing Malevolence from Benevolence: The Menace of Benign Data on Machine Unlearning

Binhao Ma, Tianhang Zheng, Hongsheng Hu, Di Wang, Shuo Wang, Zhongjie Ba, Zhan Qin, Kui Ren

Machine learning models trained on vast amounts of real or synthetic data often achieve outstanding predictive performance across various domains. However, this utility comes with increasing concerns about privacy, as the training data may include sensitive information. To address these concerns, machine unlearning has been proposed to erase specific data samples from models. While some unlearning techniques efficiently remove data at low costs, recent research highlights vulnerabilities where malicious users could request unlearning on manipulated data to compromise the model. Despite these attacks' effectiveness, perturbed data differs from original training data, failing hash verification. Existing attacks on machine unlearning also suffer from practical limitations and require substantial additional knowledge and resources. To fill the gaps in current unlearning attacks, we introduce the Unlearning Usability Attack. This model-agnostic, unlearning-agnostic, and budget-friendly attack distills data distribution information into a small set of benign data. These data are identified as benign by automatic poisoning detection tools due to their positive impact on model training. While benign for machine learning, unlearning these data significantly degrades model information. Our evaluation demonstrates that unlearning this benign data, comprising no more than 1% of the total training data, can reduce model accuracy by up to 50%. Furthermore, our findings show that well-prepared benign data poses challenges for recent unlearning techniques, as erasing these synthetic instances demands higher resources than regular data. These insights underscore the need for future research to reconsider data poisoning in the context of machine unlearning.

7/9/2024