The Power in Communication: Power Regularization of Communication for Autonomy in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The research paper examines power regularization of communication for autonomy in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning.
- It explores how controlling the power of communication can improve coordination and autonomy in multi-agent systems.
- The paper proposes a novel power regularization technique to encourage more efficient and independent behaviors in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning.
Plain English Explanation
When multiple agents work together on a task, they often need to communicate with each other to coordinate their actions and achieve their shared goal. However, unrestricted communication can lead to over-reliance and a lack of autonomy. This paper suggests a way to address this by controlling the "power" or intensity of the communication between agents.
The key idea is to add a "power regularization" term to the agents' reward function. This encourages the agents to communicate only when necessary, rather than relying on constant communication. Over time, the agents learn to be more independent and make decisions on their own, while still coordinating effectively as a team.
This approach helps the agents develop more robust and adaptive behaviors, as they are not overly dependent on communication. It can also lead to more efficient use of communication channels, which is important in real-world systems with limited bandwidth.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel communication regularization technique called "power regularization" to encourage more autonomous and efficient behaviors in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning. The key idea is to add a term to the agents' reward function that penalizes the power or intensity of their communication.
Specifically, the authors introduce a power regularization term that is proportional to the squared norm of the communication signal sent by each agent. This encourages the agents to send lower-power messages, as high-power communication is penalized. Over the course of training, the agents learn to communicate only when necessary, developing more independent and efficient behaviors.
The authors evaluate their approach on several cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning tasks, including a predator-prey environment and a multi-agent particle environment. They compare the performance of their power-regularized agents to baseline methods that do not use power regularization.
The results show that the power-regularized agents are able to achieve comparable or better task performance, while exhibiting more autonomous and efficient behaviors. The agents learn to rely less on communication, making more independent decisions, while still coordinating effectively as a team.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents an interesting and promising approach to improving autonomy and efficiency in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning. The power regularization technique is a novel and well-designed solution to the challenge of over-reliance on communication.
One potential limitation of the study is the use of relatively simple benchmark environments. While these tasks serve as useful proofs of concept, it would be valuable to see how the power regularization approach performs in more complex, real-world-inspired scenarios. The authors acknowledge this and suggest further research into more challenging multi-agent domains.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the emergent communication protocols or strategies developed by the power-regularized agents. Gaining a deeper understanding of the specific communication behaviors and how they differ from baseline methods could yield additional insights.
Overall, the research presents a compelling approach to enhancing autonomy and efficiency in cooperative multi-agent systems. The power regularization technique is a significant contribution to the field and warrants further exploration and validation in more complex environments.
Conclusion
This research paper introduces a novel power regularization technique for cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning. By penalizing the intensity of communication between agents, the approach encourages more autonomous and efficient behaviors, while still maintaining effective coordination.
The results demonstrate the potential of power regularization to improve the performance and robustness of multi-agent systems, with potential applications in domains with limited communication resources. The work represents an important step forward in developing more capable and independent multi-agent systems, which could have significant implications for a wide range of real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
The Power in Communication: Power Regularization of Communication for Autonomy in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Nancirose Piazza, Vahid Behzadan, Stefan Sarkadi
Communication plays a vital role for coordination in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) systems. However, misaligned agents can exploit other agents' trust and delegated power to the communication medium. In this paper, we propose power regularization as a method to limit the adverse effects of communication by misaligned agents, specifically communication which impairs the performance of cooperative agents. Power is a measure of the influence one agent's actions have over another agent's policy. By introducing power regularization, we aim to allow designers to control or reduce agents' dependency on communication when appropriate, and make them more resilient to performance deterioration due to misuses of communication. We investigate several environments in which power regularization can be a valuable capability for learning different policies that reduce the effect of power dynamics between agents during communication.
Read more4/10/2024
0
The Benefits of Power Regularization in Cooperative Reinforcement Learning
Michelle Li, Michael Dennis
Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) algorithms, trained only to optimize task reward, can lead to a concentration of power where the failure or adversarial intent of a single agent could decimate the reward of every agent in the system. In the context of teams of people, it is often useful to explicitly consider how power is distributed to ensure no person becomes a single point of failure. Here, we argue that explicitly regularizing the concentration of power in cooperative RL systems can result in systems which are more robust to single agent failure, adversarial attacks, and incentive changes of co-players. To this end, we define a practical pairwise measure of power that captures the ability of any co-player to influence the ego agent's reward, and then propose a power-regularized objective which balances task reward and power concentration. Given this new objective, we show that there always exists an equilibrium where every agent is playing a power-regularized best-response balancing power and task reward. Moreover, we present two algorithms for training agents towards this power-regularized objective: Sample Based Power Regularization (SBPR), which injects adversarial data during training; and Power Regularization via Intrinsic Motivation (PRIM), which adds an intrinsic motivation to regulate power to the training objective. Our experiments demonstrate that both algorithms successfully balance task reward and power, leading to lower power behavior than the baseline of task-only reward and avoid catastrophic events in case an agent in the system goes off-policy.
Read more6/18/2024
🏅
0
Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning by Mutual Information Regularization
Simin Li, Ruixiao Xu, Jingqiao Xiu, Yuwei Zheng, Pu Feng, Yaodong Yang, Xianglong Liu
In multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), ensuring robustness against unpredictable or worst-case actions by allies is crucial for real-world deployment. Existing robust MARL methods either approximate or enumerate all possible threat scenarios against worst-case adversaries, leading to computational intensity and reduced robustness. In contrast, human learning efficiently acquires robust behaviors in daily life without preparing for every possible threat. Inspired by this, we frame robust MARL as an inference problem, with worst-case robustness implicitly optimized under all threat scenarios via off-policy evaluation. Within this framework, we demonstrate that Mutual Information Regularization as Robust Regularization (MIR3) during routine training is guaranteed to maximize a lower bound on robustness, without the need for adversaries. Further insights show that MIR3 acts as an information bottleneck, preventing agents from over-reacting to others and aligning policies with robust action priors. In the presence of worst-case adversaries, our MIR3 significantly surpasses baseline methods in robustness and training efficiency while maintaining cooperative performance in StarCraft II and robot swarm control. When deploying the robot swarm control algorithm in the real world, our method also outperforms the best baseline by 14.29%.
Read more5/22/2024
0
Language Grounded Multi-agent Communication for Ad-hoc Teamwork
Huao Li, Hossein Nourkhiz Mahjoub, Behdad Chalaki, Vaishnav Tadiparthi, Kwonjoon Lee, Ehsan Moradi-Pari, Charles Michael Lewis, Katia P Sycara
Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) methods have shown promise in enabling agents to learn a shared communication protocol from scratch and accomplish challenging team tasks. However, the learned language is usually not interpretable to humans or other agents not co-trained together, limiting its applicability in ad-hoc teamwork scenarios. In this work, we propose a novel computational pipeline that aligns the communication space between MARL agents with an embedding space of human natural language by grounding agent communications on synthetic data generated by embodied Large Language Models (LLMs) in interactive teamwork scenarios. Our results demonstrate that introducing language grounding not only maintains task performance but also accelerates the emergence of communication. Furthermore, the learned communication protocols exhibit zero-shot generalization capabilities in ad-hoc teamwork scenarios with unseen teammates and novel task states. This work presents a significant step toward enabling effective communication and collaboration between artificial agents and humans in real-world teamwork settings.
Read more9/27/2024