Practical Guide for Causal Pathways and Sub-group Disparity Analysis

Read original: arXiv:2407.02702 - Published 8/9/2024 by Farnaz Kohankhaki, Shaina Raza, Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Deval Pandya, Elham Dolatabadi
Total Score

0

Practical Guide for Causal Pathways and Sub-group Disparity Analysis

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a practical guide for conducting causal pathway and subgroup disparity analysis.
  • It covers preliminary concepts, causal pathway analysis, and subgroup disparity analysis.
  • The guide aims to help researchers and practitioners analyze the causal mechanisms and identify potential disparities across different subgroups.

Plain English Explanation

This paper offers a step-by-step guide for researchers and analysts to investigate the causal relationships and uncover potential disparities within their data. The authors start by explaining some fundamental concepts, such as what causal pathways and subgroup disparities are. They then walk through the process of conducting causal pathway analysis, which involves tracing the connections between different factors and pinpointing how they influence the outcome of interest.

Next, the guide delves into subgroup disparity analysis, which focuses on identifying differences in outcomes across various demographic or socioeconomic groups. This is particularly important for understanding and addressing issues of fairness and equity, as certain populations may be systematically disadvantaged compared to others.

Throughout the explanation, the authors use clear language and provide concrete examples to make the technical concepts more accessible to a general audience. By understanding these analytical techniques, researchers and practitioners can gain deeper insights into the underlying drivers of the phenomena they are studying and develop more targeted interventions to address disparities.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by introducing the key concepts of causal pathways and subgroup disparities. Causal pathways refer to the interconnected factors that contribute to an outcome of interest, while subgroup disparities capture differences in outcomes across various demographic or socioeconomic groups.

The authors then outline a step-by-step guide for conducting causal pathway analysis. This involves defining the causal model, identifying the relevant variables, and using statistical techniques like mediation analysis to quantify the direct and indirect effects along the causal pathways. The guide also covers techniques for quantifying cross-sectoral intersecting discrepancies and investigating feature importance disparities that may contribute to subgroup disparities.

Throughout the paper, the authors emphasize the importance of considering fairness-accuracy trade-offs from a causal perspective when conducting these analyses. This helps researchers and practitioners ensure that their insights and interventions are equitable and address the underlying drivers of disparities.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and practical guide for causal pathway and subgroup disparity analysis, addressing an important gap in the literature. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research.

One key limitation is the reliance on observational data, which can make it challenging to establish causal relationships with certainty. The authors note that experimental or quasi-experimental designs would be necessary to more definitively determine causal effects.

Additionally, the guide focuses on a relatively narrow set of statistical techniques, such as mediation analysis. While these are powerful tools, there may be other analytical approaches, such as structural equation modeling or intersectional fairness discovery, that could provide complementary insights.

The authors also highlight the importance of considering contextual factors and the potential for unobserved confounders that could influence the causal relationships and subgroup disparities. Further research is needed to explore these complex dynamics and develop more robust analytical frameworks.

Conclusion

This paper provides a valuable and practical guide for researchers and practitioners interested in understanding the causal mechanisms and potential disparities within their data. By leveraging the techniques outlined in the paper, analysts can gain deeper insights into the drivers of key outcomes and develop more targeted interventions to address issues of fairness and equity. While the guide has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the field of causal analysis and disparity research.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Practical Guide for Causal Pathways and Sub-group Disparity Analysis
Total Score

0

Practical Guide for Causal Pathways and Sub-group Disparity Analysis

Farnaz Kohankhaki, Shaina Raza, Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Deval Pandya, Elham Dolatabadi

In this study, we introduce the application of causal disparity analysis to unveil intricate relationships and causal pathways between sensitive attributes and the targeted outcomes within real-world observational data. Our methodology involves employing causal decomposition analysis to quantify and examine the causal interplay between sensitive attributes and outcomes. We also emphasize the significance of integrating heterogeneity assessment in causal disparity analysis to gain deeper insights into the impact of sensitive attributes within specific sub-groups on outcomes. Our two-step investigation focuses on datasets where race serves as the sensitive attribute. The results on two datasets indicate the benefit of leveraging causal analysis and heterogeneity assessment not only for quantifying biases in the data but also for disentangling their influences on outcomes. We demonstrate that the sub-groups identified by our approach to be affected the most by disparities are the ones with the largest ML classification errors. We also show that grouping the data only based on a sensitive attribute is not enough, and through these analyses, we can find sub-groups that are directly affected by disparities. We hope that our findings will encourage the adoption of such methodologies in future ethical AI practices and bias audits, fostering a more equitable and fair technological landscape.

Read more

8/9/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

A structured regression approach for evaluating model performance across intersectional subgroups

Christine Herlihy, Kimberly Truong, Alexandra Chouldechova, Miroslav Dudik

Disaggregated evaluation is a central task in AI fairness assessment, where the goal is to measure an AI system's performance across different subgroups defined by combinations of demographic or other sensitive attributes. The standard approach is to stratify the evaluation data across subgroups and compute performance metrics separately for each group. However, even for moderately-sized evaluation datasets, sample sizes quickly get small once considering intersectional subgroups, which greatly limits the extent to which intersectional groups are included in analysis. In this work, we introduce a structured regression approach to disaggregated evaluation that we demonstrate can yield reliable system performance estimates even for very small subgroups. We provide corresponding inference strategies for constructing confidence intervals and explore how goodness-of-fit testing can yield insight into the structure of fairness-related harms experienced by intersectional groups. We evaluate our approach on two publicly available datasets, and several variants of semi-synthetic data. The results show that our method is considerably more accurate than the standard approach, especially for small subgroups, and demonstrate how goodness-of-fit testing helps identify the key factors that drive differences in performance.

Read more

5/15/2024

CausalPrism: A Visual Analytics Approach for Subgroup-based Causal Heterogeneity Exploration
Total Score

0

CausalPrism: A Visual Analytics Approach for Subgroup-based Causal Heterogeneity Exploration

Jiehui Zhou, Xumeng Wang, Kam-Kwai Wong, Wei Zhang, Xingyu Liu, Juntian Zhang, Minfeng Zhu, Wei Chen

In causal inference, estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (HTEs) from observational data is critical for understanding how different subgroups respond to treatments, with broad applications such as precision medicine and targeted advertising. However, existing work on HTE, subgroup discovery, and causal visualization is insufficient to address two challenges: first, the sheer number of potential subgroups and the necessity to balance multiple objectives (e.g., high effects and low variances) pose a considerable analytical challenge. Second, effective subgroup analysis has to follow the analysis goal specified by users and provide causal results with verification. To this end, we propose a visual analytics approach for subgroup-based causal heterogeneity exploration. Specifically, we first formulate causal subgroup discovery as a constrained multi-objective optimization problem and adopt a heuristic genetic algorithm to learn the Pareto front of optimal subgroups described by interpretable rules. Combining with this model, we develop a prototype system, CausalPrism, that incorporates tabular visualization, multi-attribute rankings, and uncertainty plots to support users in interactively exploring and sorting subgroups and explaining treatment effects. Quantitative experiments validate that the proposed model can efficiently mine causal subgroups that outperform state-of-the-art HTE and subgroup discovery methods, and case studies and expert interviews demonstrate the effectiveness and usability of the system. Code is available at https://osf.io/jaqmf/?view_only=ac9575209945476b955bf829c85196e9.

Read more

8/13/2024

Total Score

0

Intersectional Unfairness Discovery

Gezheng Xu, Qi Chen, Charles Ling, Boyu Wang, Changjian Shui

AI systems have been shown to produce unfair results for certain subgroups of population, highlighting the need to understand bias on certain sensitive attributes. Current research often falls short, primarily focusing on the subgroups characterized by a single sensitive attribute, while neglecting the nature of intersectional fairness of multiple sensitive attributes. This paper focuses on its one fundamental aspect by discovering diverse high-bias subgroups under intersectional sensitive attributes. Specifically, we propose a Bias-Guided Generative Network (BGGN). By treating each bias value as a reward, BGGN efficiently generates high-bias intersectional sensitive attributes. Experiments on real-world text and image datasets demonstrate a diverse and efficient discovery of BGGN. To further evaluate the generated unseen but possible unfair intersectional sensitive attributes, we formulate them as prompts and use modern generative AI to produce new texts and images. The results of frequently generating biased data provides new insights of discovering potential unfairness in popular modern generative AI systems. Warning: This paper contains generative examples that are offensive in nature.

Read more

6/10/2024