Quantifying the Cross-sectoral Intersecting Discrepancies within Multiple Groups Using Latent Class Analysis Towards Fairness
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a novel approach to quantifying cross-sectoral discrepancies within multiple groups using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to address fairness concerns.
- The researchers develop a systematic methodology to identify and measure intersectional biases across different sectors or domains.
- The proposed technique aims to uncover hidden patterns and discrepancies in outcomes that may be overlooked by traditional analysis methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a problem known as "intersectional fairness." This refers to how different factors like gender, race, and socioeconomic status can combine to create unique forms of unfairness or discrimination. Traditional analysis often looks at these factors in isolation, missing the full picture.
The researchers developed a new statistical technique called Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to tackle this issue. LCA allows them to uncover underlying "subgroups" within a population that may be experiencing very different outcomes, even if they look similar on the surface.
By applying this method across multiple domains or sectors (e.g., healthcare, education, employment), the researchers can identify patterns of intersectional bias that cut across different areas of life. This provides a more comprehensive view of fairness challenges facing marginalized communities.
The goal is to give policymakers and organizations a powerful tool to diagnose and address complex, systemic inequities. Rather than looking at one factor at a time, this approach reveals the full, intersectional picture of disparities experienced by different subgroups.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel framework for "Quantifying the Cross-sectoral Intersecting Discrepancies" using Latent Class Analysis (LCA). LCA is a statistical technique that can uncover hidden subgroups or "latent classes" within a population based on patterns in observed data.
The researchers apply LCA across multiple domains or "sectors" (e.g., healthcare, education, employment) to identify intersecting biases and disparities. This allows them to move beyond looking at single factors (like race or gender) in isolation and instead capture the complex, compounding effects of intersectionality.
The key steps of their approach are:
- Collecting relevant data across different sectors
- Applying LCA to uncover latent subgroups within each sector
- Comparing the latent classes and their outcomes across sectors to identify intersecting discrepancies
- Quantifying the magnitude and statistical significance of these cross-sectoral disparities
By automating this process, the researchers create a systematic way to diagnose and measure intersectional fairness challenges. This provides actionable insights that can inform policy decisions and interventions to promote more equitable outcomes.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and rigorous approach to a critical issue in fairness and equity research. The use of Latent Class Analysis is a clever way to uncover hidden patterns of intersectional bias that may be missed by traditional analysis techniques.
However, the authors acknowledge some limitations of their method. The accuracy of the LCA model depends on the quality and representativeness of the input data, which can be challenging to obtain, especially for marginalized communities. There may also be complexities and confounding factors that the model fails to capture.
Additionally, while the framework provides a systematic way to quantify intersectional disparities, it does not directly prescribe solutions. More work is needed to translate these diagnostic insights into effective interventions and policy changes.
Overall, this research makes an important contribution by advancing analytical methods to better understand and address intersectional fairness challenges. However, continued refinement and real-world application will be crucial to realizing its full potential impact.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to quantifying cross-sectoral intersectional discrepancies using Latent Class Analysis. By uncovering hidden patterns of bias and inequity across different domains, the researchers provide a powerful tool for diagnosing and addressing complex, systemic fairness challenges.
The systematic, data-driven nature of this framework can help policymakers and organizations move beyond simplistic, single-factor views of fairness and equity. Instead, it offers a more comprehensive, intersectional perspective that is essential for creating meaningful, lasting change.
While the method has some limitations, this research represents an important step forward in the pursuit of true fairness and equality. Continued development and real-world application of these techniques will be crucial to driving progress and ensuring no one is left behind.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Quantifying the Cross-sectoral Intersecting Discrepancies within Multiple Groups Using Latent Class Analysis Towards Fairness
Yingfang Yuan, Kefan Chen, Mehdi Rizvi, Lynne Baillie, Wei Pang
The growing interest in fair AI development is evident. The ''Leave No One Behind'' initiative urges us to address multiple and intersecting forms of inequality in accessing services, resources, and opportunities, emphasising the significance of fairness in AI. This is particularly relevant as an increasing number of AI tools are applied to decision-making processes, such as resource allocation and service scheme development, across various sectors such as health, energy, and housing. Therefore, exploring joint inequalities in these sectors is significant and valuable for thoroughly understanding overall inequality and unfairness. This research introduces an innovative approach to quantify cross-sectoral intersecting discrepancies among user-defined groups using latent class analysis. These discrepancies can be used to approximate inequality and provide valuable insights to fairness issues. We validate our approach using both proprietary and public datasets, including EVENS and Census 2021 (England & Wales) datasets, to examine cross-sectoral intersecting discrepancies among different ethnic groups. We also verify the reliability of the quantified discrepancy by conducting a correlation analysis with a government public metric. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies between minority ethnic groups, highlighting the need for targeted interventions in real-world AI applications. Additionally, we demonstrate how the proposed approach can be used to provide insights into the fairness of machine learning.
Read more7/12/2024
↗️
0
A structured regression approach for evaluating model performance across intersectional subgroups
Christine Herlihy, Kimberly Truong, Alexandra Chouldechova, Miroslav Dudik
Disaggregated evaluation is a central task in AI fairness assessment, where the goal is to measure an AI system's performance across different subgroups defined by combinations of demographic or other sensitive attributes. The standard approach is to stratify the evaluation data across subgroups and compute performance metrics separately for each group. However, even for moderately-sized evaluation datasets, sample sizes quickly get small once considering intersectional subgroups, which greatly limits the extent to which intersectional groups are included in analysis. In this work, we introduce a structured regression approach to disaggregated evaluation that we demonstrate can yield reliable system performance estimates even for very small subgroups. We provide corresponding inference strategies for constructing confidence intervals and explore how goodness-of-fit testing can yield insight into the structure of fairness-related harms experienced by intersectional groups. We evaluate our approach on two publicly available datasets, and several variants of semi-synthetic data. The results show that our method is considerably more accurate than the standard approach, especially for small subgroups, and demonstrate how goodness-of-fit testing helps identify the key factors that drive differences in performance.
Read more5/15/2024
📊
0
Synthetic Data Generation for Intersectional Fairness by Leveraging Hierarchical Group Structure
Gaurav Maheshwari, Aur'elien Bellet, Pascal Denis, Mikaela Keller
In this paper, we introduce a data augmentation approach specifically tailored to enhance intersectional fairness in classification tasks. Our method capitalizes on the hierarchical structure inherent to intersectionality, by viewing groups as intersections of their parent categories. This perspective allows us to augment data for smaller groups by learning a transformation function that combines data from these parent groups. Our empirical analysis, conducted on four diverse datasets including both text and images, reveals that classifiers trained with this data augmentation approach achieve superior intersectional fairness and are more robust to ``leveling down'' when compared to methods optimizing traditional group fairness metrics.
Read more5/24/2024
👀
0
Fair Machine Learning for Healthcare Requires Recognizing the Intersectionality of Sociodemographic Factors, a Case Study
Alissa A. Valentine, Alexander W. Charney, Isotta Landi
As interest in implementing artificial intelligence (AI) in medical systems grows, discussion continues on how to evaluate the fairness of these systems, or the disparities they may perpetuate. Socioeconomic status (SES) is commonly included in machine learning models to control for health inequities, with the underlying assumption that increased SES is associated with better health. In this work, we considered a large cohort of patients from the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City to investigate the effect of patient SES, race, and sex on schizophrenia (SCZ) diagnosis rates via a logistic regression model. Within an intersectional framework, patient SES, race, and sex were found to have significant interactions. Our findings showed that increased SES is associated with a higher probability of obtaining a SCZ diagnosis in Black Americans ($beta=4.1times10^{-8}$, $SE=4.5times10^{-9}$, $p < 0.001$). Whereas high SES acts as a protective factor for SCZ diagnosis in White Americans ($beta=-4.1times10^{-8}$, $SE=6.7times10^{-9}$, $p < 0.001$). Further investigation is needed to reliably explain and quantify health disparities. Nevertheless, we advocate that building fair AI tools for the health care space requires recognizing the intersectionality of sociodemographic factors.
Read more7/23/2024