Pragmatic inference of scalar implicature by LLMs

Overview

• This study investigates how large language models (LLMs) like BERT and GPT-2 handle pragmatic inference of scalar implicature, such as the word "some."
• The researchers conducted two experiments using cosine similarity and next sentence/token prediction to test the models' performance on these tasks.
• The results suggest that BERT inherently incorporates pragmatic implicature, while GPT-2 encounters more difficulty inferring implicature within context.

Plain English Explanation

The study examines how large language models (LLMs), such as BERT and GPT-2, handle a particular aspect of language understanding called "scalar implicature."

Scalar implicature refers to the way we interpret words like "some" to mean "not all," even though the literal meaning of "some" is simply "one or more." For example, if someone says, "Some of the students passed the test," we typically understand this to mean that not all the students passed.

The researchers wanted to see how well BERT and GPT-2 could handle this type of pragmatic inference - drawing meaning beyond the literal words. They did this by running two experiments:

1. Seeing how the models interpreted "some" without any additional context. Both BERT and GPT-2 showed they understood "some" to imply "not all," just like humans do.

2. Presenting the models with a "Question Under Discussion" (QUD) as additional context. This affected the models differently - BERT maintained its performance, while GPT-2 struggled more with the pragmatic inference required.

The findings suggest that BERT has inherently incorporated this pragmatic understanding of "some," in line with the "Default" model of language processing. In contrast, GPT-2 seems to have more difficulty inferring implicature within a given context, which aligns better with the "Context-driven" model.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted two sets of experiments to investigate how large language models (LLMs) like BERT and GPT-2 handle pragmatic inference of scalar implicature.

In Experiment 1, they used cosine similarity to measure how the models interpret the word "some" in the absence of any additional context. The results showed that both BERT and GPT-2 interpret "some" to implicate "not all," consistent with how humans process scalar implicature.

Experiment 2 introduced a "Question Under Discussion" (QUD) as contextual cue. With this additional information, BERT maintained its performance in inferring pragmatic implicature. However, GPT-2 encountered processing difficulties when the QUD required pragmatic inference to fully understand the implicature.

These findings reveal differences in the theoretical approaches underlying BERT and GPT-2. BERT appears to inherently incorporate pragmatic implicature not all within the term "some," aligning with the Default model of language processing (Levinson, 2000). In contrast, GPT-2 seems to struggle more with inferring pragmatic implicature within a given context, consistent with the Context-driven model (Sperber and Wilson, 2002).

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into how leading LLMs handle pragmatic inference, but it also has some important limitations:

• The experiments were conducted on a relatively small scale, with only two models (BERT and GPT-2) tested. It would be beneficial to expand the research to include a wider range of LLMs to see if the observed patterns hold true more broadly.

• The researchers acknowledged that the models' performance may be influenced by the specific training data and fine-tuning approaches used. Further research is needed to understand how different training regimes and data sources impact pragmatic inference capabilities.

• The study focused solely on scalar implicature using the word "some." While this is an important aspect of pragmatic inference, there are many other types of implicature and contextual cues that could be explored to gain a more comprehensive understanding of LLMs' language understanding abilities.

Despite these caveats, the study makes a valuable contribution by shedding light on the theoretical underpinnings of how leading LLMs process pragmatic meaning. The findings suggest that different architectural approaches and training methods may lead to divergent strengths and weaknesses in handling contextual inference, an important consideration as these models are deployed in real-world applications.

Conclusion

This study investigates how large language models (LLMs) like BERT and GPT-2 handle pragmatic inference of scalar implicature, such as interpreting "some" to mean "not all." The results suggest that BERT has inherently incorporated this pragmatic understanding, while GPT-2 encounters more difficulty inferring implicature within a given context.

These findings have important implications for our understanding of how LLMs process language and draw meaning beyond the literal words. As these models become increasingly prevalent, it will be crucial to continue exploring their strengths and limitations in handling the nuances of human communication.