A primer on synthetic health data

Read original: arXiv:2401.17653 - Published 7/4/2024 by Jennifer A Bartell, Sander Boisen Valentin, Anders Krogh, Henning Langberg, Martin B{o}gsted
Total Score

0

📊

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Recent advances in deep generative models have enabled the creation of realistic synthetic health datasets.
  • These synthetic datasets aim to preserve the characteristics and patterns of sensitive health data without disclosing patient identity or sensitive information.
  • Synthetic data can facilitate safe data sharing to support initiatives like developing new predictive models, advanced health IT platforms, and project ideation.
  • However, challenges remain in consistently evaluating a synthetic dataset's similarity and predictive utility compared to the original real dataset, as well as managing privacy risks when shared.
  • Regulatory and governance issues around synthetic health data also need to be addressed.

Plain English Explanation

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the development of deep generative models that can create realistic-looking synthetic health data. This synthetic data is designed to mimic the characteristics and patterns found in sensitive real-world health datasets, but without revealing any individual patient's identity or private information.

The goal of these synthetic datasets is to enable safe data sharing that supports a variety of important initiatives in healthcare. For example, researchers can use the synthetic data to develop new predictive models or test advanced health technology platforms, without needing access to the original sensitive data. Synthetic data can also be used for general project planning and hypothesis development.

However, there are still some significant challenges to address. It can be difficult to consistently evaluate how well the synthetic data matches the original real-world dataset, both in terms of statistical similarity and the dataset's usefulness for making accurate predictions. There are also concerns about the potential privacy risks when synthetic data is shared, even if it doesn't contain identifiable information.

Additionally, the regulatory landscape and governance structures around the use of synthetic health data have not been fully addressed yet. More work is needed to establish best practices and policies in this emerging field.

Technical Explanation

The paper maps the current state of synthetic health data, including the methods and tools used to generate and evaluate these datasets, examples of real-world deployments, and the regulatory and ethical considerations.

Key generation techniques covered include generative adversarial networks (GANs) and variational autoencoders (VAEs), which can learn the underlying patterns in health data and produce realistic synthetic samples. Methods for evaluating synthetic data quality, such as statistical tests and downstream task performance, are also discussed.

The paper highlights existing examples of synthetic health data being used, such as for training machine learning models or testing new health IT systems. However, it notes that challenges remain in consistently measuring how well the synthetic data matches the original in terms of both statistical similarity and predictive utility.

Privacy and ethical concerns around synthetic data are also explored. While the data itself does not contain identifiable information, there are still risks that need to be managed, such as the potential for re-identification. Regulatory frameworks and governance structures for synthetic health data have not yet been widely established.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of synthetic health data, but it also acknowledges several key challenges and limitations that require further research and development.

One significant issue is the difficulty in reliably evaluating the quality and utility of synthetic datasets compared to the original real-world data. The paper highlights the need for more robust and standardized evaluation methods to ensure the synthetic data maintains the essential characteristics and predictive power of the source material. Ongoing work in areas like BT-GAN may help address these evaluation challenges.

Additionally, while synthetic data is designed to protect privacy, the paper notes that there are still potential risks that must be carefully managed. More research is needed to fully understand and mitigate these privacy concerns, especially as synthetic data is increasingly democratized for wider use.

The regulatory and governance landscape around synthetic health data also remains underdeveloped, according to the paper. Establishing clear policies, guidelines, and oversight mechanisms will be crucial to ensure the ethical and responsible use of these datasets, particularly in sensitive healthcare domains.

Overall, the paper provides a thorough introduction to the current state of synthetic health data, highlighting both the significant potential and the lingering challenges that the field must continue to address.

Conclusion

Advances in deep generative models have enabled the creation of realistic synthetic health datasets that can preserve the characteristics and patterns of sensitive real-world data without compromising patient privacy. These synthetic datasets have the potential to facilitate safe data sharing and support a range of important initiatives in healthcare, from developing new predictive models to testing advanced health IT platforms.

However, the paper identifies several key challenges that need to be resolved, including consistently evaluating the similarity and predictive utility of synthetic data compared to original datasets, as well as managing the privacy risks when these datasets are shared. Regulatory and governance frameworks around synthetic health data also require further development to ensure its ethical and responsible use.

Overall, the field of synthetic health data is a promising area of research and innovation, but continued work is needed to address the remaining technical, privacy, and regulatory hurdles. As these challenges are overcome, synthetic data could become an increasingly valuable tool for advancing healthcare research and applications in a safe and responsible manner.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📊

Total Score

0

A primer on synthetic health data

Jennifer A Bartell, Sander Boisen Valentin, Anders Krogh, Henning Langberg, Martin B{o}gsted

Recent advances in deep generative models have greatly expanded the potential to create realistic synthetic health datasets. These synthetic datasets aim to preserve the characteristics, patterns, and overall scientific conclusions derived from sensitive health datasets without disclosing patient identity or sensitive information. Thus, synthetic data can facilitate safe data sharing that supports a range of initiatives including the development of new predictive models, advanced health IT platforms, and general project ideation and hypothesis development. However, many questions and challenges remain, including how to consistently evaluate a synthetic dataset's similarity and predictive utility in comparison to the original real dataset and risk to privacy when shared. Additional regulatory and governance issues have not been widely addressed. In this primer, we map the state of synthetic health data, including generation and evaluation methods and tools, existing examples of deployment, the regulatory and ethical landscape, access and governance options, and opportunities for further development.

Read more

7/4/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Synthetic data: How could it be used for infectious disease research?

Styliani-Christina Fragkouli, Dhwani Solanki, Leyla J Castro, Fotis E Psomopoulos, N'uria Queralt-Rosinach, Davide Cirillo, Lisa C Crossman

Over the last three to five years, it has become possible to generate machine learning synthetic data for healthcare-related uses. However, concerns have been raised about potential negative factors associated with the possibilities of artificial dataset generation. These include the potential misuse of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in fields such as cybercrime, the use of deepfakes and fake news to deceive or manipulate, and displacement of human jobs across various market sectors. Here, we consider both current and future positive advances and possibilities with synthetic datasets. Synthetic data offers significant benefits, particularly in data privacy, research, in balancing datasets and reducing bias in machine learning models. Generative AI is an artificial intelligence genre capable of creating text, images, video or other data using generative models. The recent explosion of interest in GenAI was heralded by the invention and speedy move to use of large language models (LLM). These computational models are able to achieve general-purpose language generation and other natural language processing tasks and are based on transformer architectures, which made an evolutionary leap from previous neural network architectures. Fuelled by the advent of improved GenAI techniques and wide scale usage, this is surely the time to consider how synthetic data can be used to advance infectious disease research. In this commentary we aim to create an overview of the current and future position of synthetic data in infectious disease research.

Read more

7/10/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Artificial Data, Real Insights: Evaluating Opportunities and Risks of Expanding the Data Ecosystem with Synthetic Data

Richard Timpone, Yongwei Yang

Synthetic Data is not new, but recent advances in Generative AI have raised interest in expanding the research toolbox, creating new opportunities and risks. This article provides a taxonomy of the full breadth of the Synthetic Data domain. We discuss its place in the research ecosystem by linking the advances in computational social science with the idea of the Fourth Paradigm of scientific discovery that integrates the elements of the evolution from empirical to theoretic to computational models. Further, leveraging the framework of Truth, Beauty, and Justice, we discuss how evaluation criteria vary across use cases as the information is used to add value and draw insights. Building a framework to organize different types of synthetic data, we end by describing the opportunities and challenges with detailed examples of using Generative AI to create synthetic quantitative and qualitative datasets and discuss the broader spectrum including synthetic populations, expert systems, survey data replacement, and personabots.

Read more

8/29/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Generative AI for Synthetic Data Across Multiple Medical Modalities: A Systematic Review of Recent Developments and Challenges

Mahmoud Ibrahim, Yasmina Al Khalil, Sina Amirrajab, Chang Suna, Marcel Breeuwer, Josien Pluim, Bart Elen, Gokhan Ertaylan, Michel Dumontiera

This paper presents a comprehensive systematic review of generative models (GANs, VAEs, DMs, and LLMs) used to synthesize various medical data types, including imaging (dermoscopic, mammographic, ultrasound, CT, MRI, and X-ray), text, time-series, and tabular data (EHR). Unlike previous narrowly focused reviews, our study encompasses a broad array of medical data modalities and explores various generative models. Our search strategy queries databases such as Scopus, PubMed, and ArXiv, focusing on recent works from January 2021 to November 2023, excluding reviews and perspectives. This period emphasizes recent advancements beyond GANs, which have been extensively covered previously. The survey reveals insights from three key aspects: (1) Synthesis applications and purpose of synthesis, (2) generation techniques, and (3) evaluation methods. It highlights clinically valid synthesis applications, demonstrating the potential of synthetic data to tackle diverse clinical requirements. While conditional models incorporating class labels, segmentation masks and image translations are prevalent, there is a gap in utilizing prior clinical knowledge and patient-specific context, suggesting a need for more personalized synthesis approaches and emphasizing the importance of tailoring generative approaches to the unique characteristics of medical data. Additionally, there is a significant gap in using synthetic data beyond augmentation, such as for validation and evaluation of downstream medical AI models. The survey uncovers that the lack of standardized evaluation methodologies tailored to medical images is a barrier to clinical application, underscoring the need for in-depth evaluation approaches, benchmarking, and comparative studies to promote openness and collaboration.

Read more

7/2/2024