Prism: A Framework for Decoupling and Assessing the Capabilities of VLMs
2406.14544
0
0
Abstract
Vision Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate remarkable proficiency in addressing a wide array of visual questions, which requires strong perception and reasoning faculties. Assessing these two competencies independently is crucial for model refinement, despite the inherent difficulty due to the intertwined nature of seeing and reasoning in existing VLMs. To tackle this issue, we present Prism, an innovative framework designed to disentangle the perception and reasoning processes involved in visual question solving. Prism comprises two distinct stages: a perception stage that utilizes a VLM to extract and articulate visual information in textual form, and a reasoning stage that formulates responses based on the extracted visual information using a Large Language Model (LLM). This modular design enables the systematic comparison and assessment of both proprietary and open-source VLM for their perception and reasoning strengths. Our analytical framework provides several valuable insights, underscoring Prism's potential as a cost-effective solution for vision-language tasks. By combining a streamlined VLM focused on perception with a powerful LLM tailored for reasoning, Prism achieves superior results in general vision-language tasks while substantially cutting down on training and operational expenses. Quantitative evaluations show that Prism, when configured with a vanilla 2B LLaVA and freely accessible GPT-3.5, delivers performance on par with VLMs $10 times$ larger on the rigorous multimodal benchmark MMStar. The project is released at: https://github.com/SparksJoe/Prism.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Presents a new framework called "Prism" for decoupling and assessing the capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs)
- Aims to provide a systematic way to evaluate the individual capabilities of VLMs, rather than just their overall performance
- Explores how different design choices and architectural components impact the performance of VLMs on various tasks
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new framework called "Prism" that is designed to help researchers and developers better understand the capabilities of vision-language models. These models are able to work with both visual and textual information, and have shown impressive results on a variety of tasks.
However, the authors argue that existing evaluation methods often only look at the overall performance of these models, without digging deeper into the specific capabilities that contribute to that performance. Prism aims to change that by providing a structured way to assess individual capabilities, such as how well the model can understand visual concepts, reason about relationships, or engage in language-based tasks.
By breaking down VLM performance in this way, the researchers hope to gain more insights into the design choices and architectural components that are most important for building effective vision-language models. This could help guide the development of future models and lead to more robust and capable systems.
Technical Explanation
The Prism framework is built around a set of carefully designed probing tasks that test specific capabilities of VLMs, such as visual understanding, language comprehension, and reasoning about relationships. These tasks are designed to be modular and extensible, allowing researchers to easily add new capabilities to the framework.
The authors evaluate several state-of-the-art VLMs using Prism, and analyze how different architectural choices, such as the type of visual backbone or language model used, impact performance across the various capabilities. This provides a more nuanced understanding of these models' strengths and weaknesses compared to simply looking at their overall accuracy on benchmark tasks.
The results reveal some interesting insights, such as the importance of combining different types of visual and textual representations to achieve strong performance, and the challenges that current VLMs face when it comes to more abstract reasoning tasks.
Critical Analysis
The Prism framework represents a valuable contribution to the field of vision-language modeling, as it addresses an important limitation of existing evaluation methods. By breaking down VLM performance into individual capabilities, the framework can provide more actionable insights for model development and improvement.
That said, the authors acknowledge that Prism is not a complete solution, and there are still many open challenges in terms of how to design the most informative probing tasks and how to interpret the resulting capability profiles. The framework is also limited to the specific capabilities that have been included so far, and may need to be continuously expanded to keep pace with the evolving field of vision-language modeling.
Additionally, while the paper provides a thorough analysis of several state-of-the-art VLMs, it would be valuable to see the framework applied to a wider range of models, including those from different research groups and with varying architectural choices. This could help validate the generalizability of the insights gained from the current study.
Conclusion
Overall, the Prism framework represents a significant step forward in the quest to better understand and improve upon vision-language models. By providing a systematic way to assess individual model capabilities, the framework can help researchers and developers make more informed decisions about model design and architecture. While there is still work to be done, the insights gained from this study could have important implications for the continued advancement of this rapidly evolving field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models
Siddharth Karamcheti, Suraj Nair, Ashwin Balakrishna, Percy Liang, Thomas Kollar, Dorsa Sadigh
0
0
Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning; adoption that has fueled a wealth of new models such as LLaVa, InstructBLIP, and PaLI-3. Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored, making it challenging to understand what factors account for model performance $-$ a challenge further complicated by the lack of objective, consistent evaluations. To address these gaps, we first compile a suite of standardized evaluations spanning visual question answering, object localization, and challenge sets that probe properties such as hallucination; evaluations that provide fine-grained insight VLM capabilities. Second, we rigorously investigate VLMs along key design axes, including pretrained visual representations and training from base vs. instruct-tuned language models, amongst others. We couple our analysis with three resource contributions: (1) a unified framework for evaluating VLMs, (2) optimized, flexible training code, and (3) checkpoints for all models, including a family of VLMs at the 7-13B scale that strictly outperform InstructBLIP and LLaVa v1.5, the state-of-the-art in open VLMs.
5/31/2024
Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directions
Akash Ghosh, Arkadeep Acharya, Sriparna Saha, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha
0
0
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly reshaped the trajectory of the AI revolution. Nevertheless, these LLMs exhibit a notable limitation, as they are primarily adept at processing textual information. To address this constraint, researchers have endeavored to integrate visual capabilities with LLMs, resulting in the emergence of Vision-Language Models (VLMs). These advanced models are instrumental in tackling more intricate tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. In our comprehensive survey paper, we delve into the key advancements within the realm of VLMs. Our classification organizes VLMs into three distinct categories: models dedicated to vision-language understanding, models that process multimodal inputs to generate unimodal (textual) outputs and models that both accept and produce multimodal inputs and outputs.This classification is based on their respective capabilities and functionalities in processing and generating various modalities of data.We meticulously dissect each model, offering an extensive analysis of its foundational architecture, training data sources, as well as its strengths and limitations wherever possible, providing readers with a comprehensive understanding of its essential components. We also analyzed the performance of VLMs in various benchmark datasets. By doing so, we aim to offer a nuanced understanding of the diverse landscape of VLMs. Additionally, we underscore potential avenues for future research in this dynamic domain, anticipating further breakthroughs and advancements.
4/16/2024
An Introduction to Vision-Language Modeling
Florian Bordes, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Anurag Ajay, Alexander C. Li, Adrien Bardes, Suzanne Petryk, Oscar Ma~nas, Zhiqiu Lin, Anas Mahmoud, Bargav Jayaraman, Mark Ibrahim, Melissa Hall, Yunyang Xiong, Jonathan Lebensold, Candace Ross, Srihari Jayakumar, Chuan Guo, Diane Bouchacourt, Haider Al-Tahan, Karthik Padthe, Vasu Sharma, Hu Xu, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Megan Richards, Samuel Lavoie, Pietro Astolfi, Reyhane Askari Hemmat, Jun Chen, Kushal Tirumala, Rim Assouel, Mazda Moayeri, Arjang Talattof, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Zechun Liu, Xilun Chen, Quentin Garrido, Karen Ullrich, Aishwarya Agrawal, Kate Saenko, Asli Celikyilmaz, Vikas Chandra
0
0
Following the recent popularity of Large Language Models (LLMs), several attempts have been made to extend them to the visual domain. From having a visual assistant that could guide us through unfamiliar environments to generative models that produce images using only a high-level text description, the vision-language model (VLM) applications will significantly impact our relationship with technology. However, there are many challenges that need to be addressed to improve the reliability of those models. While language is discrete, vision evolves in a much higher dimensional space in which concepts cannot always be easily discretized. To better understand the mechanics behind mapping vision to language, we present this introduction to VLMs which we hope will help anyone who would like to enter the field. First, we introduce what VLMs are, how they work, and how to train them. Then, we present and discuss approaches to evaluate VLMs. Although this work primarily focuses on mapping images to language, we also discuss extending VLMs to videos.
5/28/2024
ViCor: Bridging Visual Understanding and Commonsense Reasoning with Large Language Models
Kaiwen Zhou, Kwonjoon Lee, Teruhisa Misu, Xin Eric Wang
0
0
In our work, we explore the synergistic capabilities of pre-trained vision-and-language models (VLMs) and large language models (LLMs) on visual commonsense reasoning (VCR) problems. We find that VLMs and LLMs-based decision pipelines are good at different kinds of VCR problems. Pre-trained VLMs exhibit strong performance for problems involving understanding the literal visual content, which we noted as visual commonsense understanding (VCU). For problems where the goal is to infer conclusions beyond image content, which we noted as visual commonsense inference (VCI), VLMs face difficulties, while LLMs, given sufficient visual evidence, can use commonsense to infer the answer well. We empirically validate this by letting LLMs classify VCR problems into these two categories and show the significant difference between VLM and LLM with image caption decision pipelines on two subproblems. Moreover, we identify a challenge with VLMs' passive perception, which may miss crucial context information, leading to incorrect reasoning by LLMs. Based on these, we suggest a collaborative approach, named ViCor, where pre-trained LLMs serve as problem classifiers to analyze the problem category, then either use VLMs to answer the question directly or actively instruct VLMs to concentrate on and gather relevant visual elements to support potential commonsense inferences. We evaluate our framework on two VCR benchmark datasets and outperform all other methods that do not require in-domain fine-tuning.
5/20/2024