What matters when building vision-language models?

2405.02246

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/6/2024 by Hugo Laurenc{c}on, L'eo Tronchon, Matthieu Cord, Victor Sanh
What matters when building vision-language models?

Abstract

The growing interest in vision-language models (VLMs) has been driven by improvements in large language models and vision transformers. Despite the abundance of literature on this subject, we observe that critical decisions regarding the design of VLMs are often not justified. We argue that these unsupported decisions impede progress in the field by making it difficult to identify which choices improve model performance. To address this issue, we conduct extensive experiments around pre-trained models, architecture choice, data, and training methods. Our consolidation of findings includes the development of Idefics2, an efficient foundational VLM of 8 billion parameters. Idefics2 achieves state-of-the-art performance within its size category across various multimodal benchmarks, and is often on par with models four times its size. We release the model (base, instructed, and chat) along with the datasets created for its training.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the important considerations when building vision-language models, which are AI systems that can understand and generate text based on visual inputs.
  • The paper covers key terminology, examines the design space of vision-language models, and reviews several recent research papers in this area.
  • The paper aims to provide insights to help researchers and engineers develop more effective vision-language models for a variety of applications.

Plain English Explanation

Vision-language models are a type of AI system that can understand and generate text based on visual inputs, such as images or videos. These models have a wide range of potential applications, from image captioning and visual question answering to multimodal dialogue systems and advanced user interfaces.

Building effective vision-language models involves navigating a complex design space with many interrelated choices, such as the model architecture, training data, and learning objectives. The authors of this paper set out to explore the key factors that influence the performance and capabilities of these models.

They start by defining important terminology, such as the difference between vision-language pre-training and vision-language fine-tuning. This helps establish a common understanding of the concepts discussed throughout the paper.

The paper then delves into the specific design choices that can impact the performance of vision-language models, such as the choice of backbone vision model, the training data and objectives, and the architectural components. The authors review recent research in these areas and provide insights to help guide the development of future vision-language models.

Overall, this paper offers a comprehensive and accessible overview of the key considerations when building high-performing vision-language models, which can help advance the state of the art in this rapidly evolving field of AI.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by defining important terminology related to vision-language models. It distinguishes between vision-language pre-training, where a model is trained on a large, diverse dataset to acquire general multimodal knowledge, and vision-language fine-tuning, where the pre-trained model is further trained on a specific task or domain.

The authors then explore the design space of vision-language models, examining several key factors that can impact their performance:

  1. Backbone Vision Model: The choice of the underlying vision model, such as a convolutional neural network (CNN) or a transformer-based architecture, can significantly influence the model's capabilities and efficiency.

  2. Training Data and Objectives: The size, diversity, and quality of the training data, as well as the specific learning objectives (e.g., image captioning, visual question answering), can shape the model's understanding and reasoning abilities.

  3. Architectural Components: The inclusion and configuration of various components, such as cross-modal attention, visual-linguistic encoding, and multimodal fusion, can significantly impact the model's performance on different tasks.

The paper reviews several recent research papers that have explored these design choices, highlighting the insights and trade-offs uncovered by the studies. For example, the authors discuss how the VITAMIN-C model was able to achieve strong performance on various vision-language tasks by carefully designing its cross-modal attention and fusion mechanisms.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the key design considerations for vision-language models, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Dataset Bias: The authors note that the performance of vision-language models can be heavily influenced by biases in the training data, which may limit their generalization to real-world scenarios. Addressing these biases is an important area for future work.

  2. Task Specificity: The paper suggests that different architectural choices and training strategies may be optimal for different vision-language tasks, and that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be the best solution. Developing more versatile and adaptable models is an ongoing challenge.

  3. Interpretability and Transparency: The authors highlight the need for improved interpretability and transparency in vision-language models, as their inner workings can be difficult to understand. Advancements in concept-based analysis and other explainable AI techniques may help address this issue.

  4. Scalability and Efficiency: As vision-language models become more complex and powerful, the authors note the importance of developing efficient and scalable architectures that can be deployed in real-world applications. Balancing performance and computational requirements is an ongoing area of research.

Overall, the paper provides a thorough and well-researched exploration of the design space for vision-language models, offering valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in this rapidly evolving field of AI.

Conclusion

This paper offers a comprehensive overview of the key considerations when building effective vision-language models, a rapidly advancing area of artificial intelligence. The authors examine the design space of these models, covering important factors such as the choice of backbone vision model, training data and objectives, and architectural components.

By reviewing recent research in this area, the paper provides valuable insights to guide the development of future vision-language models. It also highlights several important limitations and areas for further exploration, such as addressing dataset biases, achieving task-specific optimization, improving interpretability, and ensuring scalability and efficiency.

Overall, this paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and engineers working on vision-language models, helping to advance the state of the art and unlock the vast potential of these multimodal AI systems across a wide range of applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directions

Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directions

Akash Ghosh, Arkadeep Acharya, Sriparna Saha, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha

YC

0

Reddit

0

The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly reshaped the trajectory of the AI revolution. Nevertheless, these LLMs exhibit a notable limitation, as they are primarily adept at processing textual information. To address this constraint, researchers have endeavored to integrate visual capabilities with LLMs, resulting in the emergence of Vision-Language Models (VLMs). These advanced models are instrumental in tackling more intricate tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. In our comprehensive survey paper, we delve into the key advancements within the realm of VLMs. Our classification organizes VLMs into three distinct categories: models dedicated to vision-language understanding, models that process multimodal inputs to generate unimodal (textual) outputs and models that both accept and produce multimodal inputs and outputs.This classification is based on their respective capabilities and functionalities in processing and generating various modalities of data.We meticulously dissect each model, offering an extensive analysis of its foundational architecture, training data sources, as well as its strengths and limitations wherever possible, providing readers with a comprehensive understanding of its essential components. We also analyzed the performance of VLMs in various benchmark datasets. By doing so, we aim to offer a nuanced understanding of the diverse landscape of VLMs. Additionally, we underscore potential avenues for future research in this dynamic domain, anticipating further breakthroughs and advancements.

Read more

4/16/2024

💬

Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models

Siddharth Karamcheti, Suraj Nair, Ashwin Balakrishna, Percy Liang, Thomas Kollar, Dorsa Sadigh

YC

0

Reddit

0

Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning; adoption that has fueled a wealth of new models such as LLaVa, InstructBLIP, and PaLI-3. Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored, making it challenging to understand what factors account for model performance $-$ a challenge further complicated by the lack of objective, consistent evaluations. To address these gaps, we first compile a suite of standardized evaluations spanning visual question answering, object localization, and challenge sets that probe properties such as hallucination; evaluations that provide fine-grained insight VLM capabilities. Second, we rigorously investigate VLMs along key design axes, including pretrained visual representations and training from base vs. instruct-tuned language models, amongst others. We couple our analysis with three resource contributions: (1) a unified framework for evaluating VLMs, (2) optimized, flexible training code, and (3) checkpoints for all models, including a family of VLMs at the 7-13B scale that strictly outperform InstructBLIP and LLaVa v1.5, the state-of-the-art in open VLMs.

Read more

5/31/2024

An Introduction to Vision-Language Modeling

An Introduction to Vision-Language Modeling

Florian Bordes, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Anurag Ajay, Alexander C. Li, Adrien Bardes, Suzanne Petryk, Oscar Ma~nas, Zhiqiu Lin, Anas Mahmoud, Bargav Jayaraman, Mark Ibrahim, Melissa Hall, Yunyang Xiong, Jonathan Lebensold, Candace Ross, Srihari Jayakumar, Chuan Guo, Diane Bouchacourt, Haider Al-Tahan, Karthik Padthe, Vasu Sharma, Hu Xu, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Megan Richards, Samuel Lavoie, Pietro Astolfi, Reyhane Askari Hemmat, Jun Chen, Kushal Tirumala, Rim Assouel, Mazda Moayeri, Arjang Talattof, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Zechun Liu, Xilun Chen, Quentin Garrido, Karen Ullrich, Aishwarya Agrawal, Kate Saenko, Asli Celikyilmaz, Vikas Chandra

YC

0

Reddit

0

Following the recent popularity of Large Language Models (LLMs), several attempts have been made to extend them to the visual domain. From having a visual assistant that could guide us through unfamiliar environments to generative models that produce images using only a high-level text description, the vision-language model (VLM) applications will significantly impact our relationship with technology. However, there are many challenges that need to be addressed to improve the reliability of those models. While language is discrete, vision evolves in a much higher dimensional space in which concepts cannot always be easily discretized. To better understand the mechanics behind mapping vision to language, we present this introduction to VLMs which we hope will help anyone who would like to enter the field. First, we introduce what VLMs are, how they work, and how to train them. Then, we present and discuss approaches to evaluate VLMs. Although this work primarily focuses on mapping images to language, we also discuss extending VLMs to videos.

Read more

5/28/2024

ViTamin: Designing Scalable Vision Models in the Vision-Language Era

ViTamin: Designing Scalable Vision Models in the Vision-Language Era

Jieneng Chen, Qihang Yu, Xiaohui Shen, Alan Yuille, Liang-Chieh Chen

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent breakthroughs in vision-language models (VLMs) start a new page in the vision community. The VLMs provide stronger and more generalizable feature embeddings compared to those from ImageNet-pretrained models, thanks to the training on the large-scale Internet image-text pairs. However, despite the amazing achievement from the VLMs, vanilla Vision Transformers (ViTs) remain the default choice for the image encoder. Although pure transformer proves its effectiveness in the text encoding area, it remains questionable whether it is also the case for image encoding, especially considering that various types of networks are proposed on the ImageNet benchmark, which, unfortunately, are rarely studied in VLMs. Due to small data/model scale, the original conclusions of model design on ImageNet can be limited and biased. In this paper, we aim at building an evaluation protocol of vision models in the vision-language era under the contrastive language-image pretraining (CLIP) framework. We provide a comprehensive way to benchmark different vision models, covering their zero-shot performance and scalability in both model and training data sizes. To this end, we introduce ViTamin, a new vision models tailored for VLMs. ViTamin-L significantly outperforms ViT-L by 2.0% ImageNet zero-shot accuracy, when using the same publicly available DataComp-1B dataset and the same OpenCLIP training scheme. ViTamin-L presents promising results on 60 diverse benchmarks, including classification, retrieval, open-vocabulary detection and segmentation, and large multi-modal models. When further scaling up the model size, our ViTamin-XL with only 436M parameters attains 82.9% ImageNet zero-shot accuracy, surpassing 82.0% achieved by EVA-E that has ten times more parameters (4.4B).

Read more

4/5/2024