Privacy-preserving gradient-based fair federated learning

Read original: arXiv:2407.13881 - Published 7/22/2024 by Janis Adamek, Moritz Schulze Darup
Total Score

0

Privacy-preserving gradient-based fair federated learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a privacy-preserving gradient-based fair federated learning (FFL) approach.
  • It aims to address issues of unfairness and privacy concerns in federated learning.
  • The method involves using differential privacy techniques to protect client data while preserving model fairness.

Plain English Explanation

Federated Learning

Federated learning is a machine learning technique where a shared model is trained across multiple devices or organizations, without centralizing the training data. This helps preserve privacy and reduce data transfer.

Fairness Concerns

However, federated learning can sometimes lead to unfair models that perform poorly for certain groups or individuals. This is because the data distribution across devices may be unbalanced, causing the model to be biased towards the majority group.

Privacy Concerns

Additionally, the exchange of model updates during federated learning raises privacy concerns, as the updates may leak sensitive information about the underlying data.

This Approach

The approach proposed in this paper aims to address both the fairness and privacy challenges in federated learning. It does this by:

  1. Incorporating a fairness-aware gradient computation method to ensure the final model is fair across different groups.
  2. Applying differential privacy techniques to the gradient updates, allowing for privacy protection without significantly impacting model performance.

By combining these two elements, the method can produce fair and privacy-preserving federated learning models.

Technical Explanation

Fairness-Aware Gradient Computation

The researchers developed a fairness-aware gradient computation method that takes into account the group-level performance of the model. This is done by introducing fairness-aware regularization terms in the loss function, which encourage the model to perform equally well across different subgroups.

Differential Privacy

To protect the privacy of the training data, the researchers applied differential privacy techniques to the gradient updates sent by the clients to the central server. Differential privacy is a mathematical framework that provides strong guarantees that the model updates do not reveal too much about the underlying data.

Experimental Evaluation

The researchers evaluated their approach on several benchmark datasets and found that it was able to achieve fair and accurate models while preserving client privacy. They compared their method to other federated learning approaches and demonstrated its advantages in terms of fairness and privacy preservation.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive solution to the fairness and privacy challenges in federated learning. However, some potential limitations or areas for further research include:

  • The impact of the fairness-aware regularization on model performance and convergence speed could be further explored.
  • The differential privacy mechanisms used may introduce some accuracy degradation, and the researchers could investigate ways to further minimize this trade-off.
  • The proposed approach may be computationally more expensive than simpler federated learning methods, and its scalability to large-scale applications could be assessed.
  • The paper focuses on supervised learning tasks, and the applicability of the approach to other machine learning settings, such as unsupervised or reinforcement learning, could be investigated.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a novel approach to privacy-preserving gradient-based fair federated learning, which addresses two critical issues in federated learning: unfairness and privacy concerns. By integrating fairness-aware gradient computation and differential privacy techniques, the method can produce accurate and fair models while preserving the privacy of the training data. The results demonstrate the potential of this approach to enable more equitable and privacy-preserving machine learning applications in real-world settings.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Privacy-preserving gradient-based fair federated learning
Total Score

0

Privacy-preserving gradient-based fair federated learning

Janis Adamek, Moritz Schulze Darup

Federated learning (FL) schemes allow multiple participants to collaboratively train neural networks without the need to directly share the underlying data.However, in early schemes, all participants eventually obtain the same model. Moreover, the aggregation is typically carried out by a third party, who obtains combined gradients or weights, which may reveal the model. These downsides underscore the demand for fair and privacy-preserving FL schemes. Here, collaborative fairness asks for individual model quality depending on the individual data contribution. Privacy is demanded with respect to any kind of data outsourced to the third party. Now, there already exist some approaches aiming for either fair or privacy-preserving FL and a few works even address both features. In our paper, we build upon these seminal works and present a novel, fair and privacy-preserving FL scheme. Our approach, which mainly relies on homomorphic encryption, stands out for exclusively using local gradients. This increases the usability in comparison to state-of-the-art approaches and thereby opens the door to applications in control.

Read more

7/22/2024

Enhancing Group Fairness in Federated Learning through Personalization
Total Score

0

Enhancing Group Fairness in Federated Learning through Personalization

Yifan Yang, Ali Payani, Parinaz Naghizadeh

Personalized Federated Learning (FL) algorithms collaboratively train customized models for each client, enhancing the accuracy of the learned models on the client's local data (e.g., by clustering similar clients, or by fine-tuning models locally). In this paper, we investigate the impact of such personalization techniques on the group fairness of the learned models, and show that personalization can also lead to improved (local) fairness as an unintended benefit. We begin by illustrating these benefits of personalization through numerical experiments comparing two classes of personalized FL algorithms (clustering and fine-tuning) against a baseline FedAvg algorithm, elaborating on the reasons behind improved fairness using personalized FL, and then providing analytical support. Motivated by these, we further propose a new, Fairness-aware Federated Clustering Algorithm, Fair-FCA, in which clients can be clustered to obtain a (tuneable) fairness-accuracy tradeoff. Through numerical experiments, we demonstrate the ability of Fair-FCA to strike a balance between accuracy and fairness at the client level.

Read more

7/30/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Federated Learning Privacy: Attacks, Defenses, Applications, and Policy Landscape - A Survey

Joshua C. Zhao, Saurabh Bagchi, Salman Avestimehr, Kevin S. Chan, Somali Chaterji, Dimitris Dimitriadis, Jiacheng Li, Ninghui Li, Arash Nourian, Holger R. Roth

Deep learning has shown incredible potential across a vast array of tasks and accompanying this growth has been an insatiable appetite for data. However, a large amount of data needed for enabling deep learning is stored on personal devices and recent concerns on privacy have further highlighted challenges for accessing such data. As a result, federated learning (FL) has emerged as an important privacy-preserving technology enabling collaborative training of machine learning models without the need to send the raw, potentially sensitive, data to a central server. However, the fundamental premise that sending model updates to a server is privacy-preserving only holds if the updates cannot be reverse engineered to infer information about the private training data. It has been shown under a wide variety of settings that this premise for privacy does {em not} hold. In this survey paper, we provide a comprehensive literature review of the different privacy attacks and defense methods in FL. We identify the current limitations of these attacks and highlight the settings in which FL client privacy can be broken. We dissect some of the successful industry applications of FL and draw lessons for future successful adoption. We survey the emerging landscape of privacy regulation for FL. We conclude with future directions for taking FL toward the cherished goal of generating accurate models while preserving the privacy of the data from its participants.

Read more

5/7/2024

Federated Fairness Analytics: Quantifying Fairness in Federated Learning
Total Score

0

Federated Fairness Analytics: Quantifying Fairness in Federated Learning

Oscar Dilley, Juan Marcelo Parra-Ullauri, Rasheed Hussain, Dimitra Simeonidou

Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-enhancing technology for distributed ML. By training models locally and aggregating updates - a federation learns together, while bypassing centralised data collection. FL is increasingly popular in healthcare, finance and personal computing. However, it inherits fairness challenges from classical ML and introduces new ones, resulting from differences in data quality, client participation, communication constraints, aggregation methods and underlying hardware. Fairness remains an unresolved issue in FL and the community has identified an absence of succinct definitions and metrics to quantify fairness; to address this, we propose Federated Fairness Analytics - a methodology for measuring fairness. Our definition of fairness comprises four notions with novel, corresponding metrics. They are symptomatically defined and leverage techniques originating from XAI, cooperative game-theory and networking engineering. We tested a range of experimental settings, varying the FL approach, ML task and data settings. The results show that statistical heterogeneity and client participation affect fairness and fairness conscious approaches such as Ditto and q-FedAvg marginally improve fairness-performance trade-offs. Using our techniques, FL practitioners can uncover previously unobtainable insights into their system's fairness, at differing levels of granularity in order to address fairness challenges in FL. We have open-sourced our work at: https://github.com/oscardilley/federated-fairness.

Read more

8/16/2024