Enhancing Group Fairness in Federated Learning through Personalization

Read original: arXiv:2407.19331 - Published 7/30/2024 by Yifan Yang, Ali Payani, Parinaz Naghizadeh
Total Score

0

Enhancing Group Fairness in Federated Learning through Personalization

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores enhancing group fairness in federated learning through personalization.
  • Federated learning is a distributed machine learning approach where multiple devices collaboratively train a model without sharing their local data.
  • The researchers propose a personalized federated learning method to improve group fairness by tailoring models to individual clients while maintaining global utility.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a way to make machine learning models more fair for different groups of people in a federated learning system. Federated learning is a method where multiple devices work together to train a shared model without directly sharing their private data.

The researchers developed a personalized federated learning approach to improve fairness across different groups. The idea is to customize the model for each individual user, while still maintaining the overall usefulness of the global model. This helps ensure the model performs well for a diverse range of users, rather than optimizing for the average user and potentially leaving some groups behind.

By tailoring the model to individual needs, the method aims to enhance fairness between different demographic groups or other user segments. This could be important in applications where the model needs to serve a wide variety of people equitably, like healthcare or financial services.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a personalized federated learning approach to improve group fairness. Specifically, they introduce a minimax optimization framework that learns a global model while also training personalized models for each client.

The global model aims to maximize average performance, while the personalized models optimize for the individual client's data distribution. This dual optimization balances overall utility and fairness across groups. The researchers also incorporate gradient-based fairness constraints to further promote equitable outcomes.

Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed method can achieve better group fairness compared to standard federated learning, without sacrificing overall model performance. The personalization allows the model to adapt to the needs of different client populations, rather than optimizing for the "average" user.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful approach to enhancing fairness in federated learning, which is an important consideration as these distributed systems become more widely deployed. The personalization strategy is a clever way to balance global utility and individual group needs.

However, the authors acknowledge several limitations. The personalized models are trained independently, which could lead to inefficient use of computing resources. There are also open questions around how to best set the fairness-utility tradeoff parameters. Further research is needed to explore these implementation details and scaling the approach to larger, more diverse datasets.

Additionally, the paper does not explore potential biases or skewed data distributions in the underlying datasets, which could undermine fairness even with the personalized approach. Careful data curation and monitoring for representation gaps would be crucial in real-world deployments.

Overall, the proposed method represents a valuable step towards more equitable federated learning systems. With continued refinement and real-world testing, this line of research could have significant impact on ensuring AI models benefit all users fairly.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel personalized federated learning approach to enhance group fairness. By training both a global model and individual personalized models, the method is able to maintain overall performance while better adapting to the needs of diverse user populations.

The results demonstrate the potential for personalization to improve fairness in federated learning systems. As these decentralized AI models become more prevalent, techniques like this will be crucial for ensuring the technology benefits all users equitably, rather than favoring the "average" case.

While further research is needed to address implementation challenges, this work represents an important advance in the pursuit of fair and inclusive AI.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Enhancing Group Fairness in Federated Learning through Personalization
Total Score

0

Enhancing Group Fairness in Federated Learning through Personalization

Yifan Yang, Ali Payani, Parinaz Naghizadeh

Personalized Federated Learning (FL) algorithms collaboratively train customized models for each client, enhancing the accuracy of the learned models on the client's local data (e.g., by clustering similar clients, or by fine-tuning models locally). In this paper, we investigate the impact of such personalization techniques on the group fairness of the learned models, and show that personalization can also lead to improved (local) fairness as an unintended benefit. We begin by illustrating these benefits of personalization through numerical experiments comparing two classes of personalized FL algorithms (clustering and fine-tuning) against a baseline FedAvg algorithm, elaborating on the reasons behind improved fairness using personalized FL, and then providing analytical support. Motivated by these, we further propose a new, Fairness-aware Federated Clustering Algorithm, Fair-FCA, in which clients can be clustered to obtain a (tuneable) fairness-accuracy tradeoff. Through numerical experiments, we demonstrate the ability of Fair-FCA to strike a balance between accuracy and fairness at the client level.

Read more

7/30/2024

Federated Fairness Analytics: Quantifying Fairness in Federated Learning
Total Score

0

Federated Fairness Analytics: Quantifying Fairness in Federated Learning

Oscar Dilley, Juan Marcelo Parra-Ullauri, Rasheed Hussain, Dimitra Simeonidou

Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-enhancing technology for distributed ML. By training models locally and aggregating updates - a federation learns together, while bypassing centralised data collection. FL is increasingly popular in healthcare, finance and personal computing. However, it inherits fairness challenges from classical ML and introduces new ones, resulting from differences in data quality, client participation, communication constraints, aggregation methods and underlying hardware. Fairness remains an unresolved issue in FL and the community has identified an absence of succinct definitions and metrics to quantify fairness; to address this, we propose Federated Fairness Analytics - a methodology for measuring fairness. Our definition of fairness comprises four notions with novel, corresponding metrics. They are symptomatically defined and leverage techniques originating from XAI, cooperative game-theory and networking engineering. We tested a range of experimental settings, varying the FL approach, ML task and data settings. The results show that statistical heterogeneity and client participation affect fairness and fairness conscious approaches such as Ditto and q-FedAvg marginally improve fairness-performance trade-offs. Using our techniques, FL practitioners can uncover previously unobtainable insights into their system's fairness, at differing levels of granularity in order to address fairness challenges in FL. We have open-sourced our work at: https://github.com/oscardilley/federated-fairness.

Read more

8/16/2024

📶

Total Score

0

Personalized Federated Learning Techniques: Empirical Analysis

Azal Ahmad Khan, Ahmad Faraz Khan, Haider Ali, Ali Anwar

Personalized Federated Learning (pFL) holds immense promise for tailoring machine learning models to individual users while preserving data privacy. However, achieving optimal performance in pFL often requires a careful balancing act between memory overhead costs and model accuracy. This paper delves into the trade-offs inherent in pFL, offering valuable insights for selecting the right algorithms for diverse real-world scenarios. We empirically evaluate ten prominent pFL techniques across various datasets and data splits, uncovering significant differences in their performance. Our study reveals interesting insights into how pFL methods that utilize personalized (local) aggregation exhibit the fastest convergence due to their efficiency in communication and computation. Conversely, fine-tuning methods face limitations in handling data heterogeneity and potential adversarial attacks while multi-objective learning methods achieve higher accuracy at the cost of additional training and resource consumption. Our study emphasizes the critical role of communication efficiency in scaling pFL, demonstrating how it can significantly affect resource usage in real-world deployments.

Read more

9/12/2024

Fairness-aware Federated Minimax Optimization with Convergence Guarantee
Total Score

0

Fairness-aware Federated Minimax Optimization with Convergence Guarantee

Gerry Windiarto Mohamad Dunda, Shenghui Song

Federated learning (FL) has garnered considerable attention due to its privacy-preserving feature. Nonetheless, the lack of freedom in managing user data can lead to group fairness issues, where models are biased towards sensitive factors such as race or gender. To tackle this issue, this paper proposes a novel algorithm, fair federated averaging with augmented Lagrangian method (FFALM), designed explicitly to address group fairness issues in FL. Specifically, we impose a fairness constraint on the training objective and solve the minimax reformulation of the constrained optimization problem. Then, we derive the theoretical upper bound for the convergence rate of FFALM. The effectiveness of FFALM in improving fairness is shown empirically on CelebA and UTKFace datasets in the presence of severe statistical heterogeneity.

Read more

7/4/2024