Federated Fairness Analytics: Quantifying Fairness in Federated Learning

Read original: arXiv:2408.08214 - Published 8/16/2024 by Oscar Dilley, Juan Marcelo Parra-Ullauri, Rasheed Hussain, Dimitra Simeonidou
Total Score

0

Federated Fairness Analytics: Quantifying Fairness in Federated Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a framework called Federated Fairness Analytics (FedFA) to quantify the fairness of machine learning models in federated learning settings.
  • Federated learning is a distributed machine learning technique where a global model is trained on data from multiple clients without sharing the raw data.
  • The FedFA framework aims to identify and mitigate fairness issues that may arise in federated learning, such as biases or disparities in model performance across different client groups.

Plain English Explanation

Federated learning is a way of training machine learning models where the data is spread out across many different devices or organizations, instead of being in one central location. The goal is to create a shared model that works well for everyone, without having to share the raw data from each individual device or organization.

The problem is that even though the data is distributed, the model that gets trained might still be unfair or biased towards certain groups of people. The Federated Fairness Analytics (FedFA) framework proposed in this paper is a way to measure and understand the fairness of the model that is being trained in a federated learning setting.

By using the FedFA framework, researchers and practitioners can identify if there are any unfair disparities in how well the model performs for different groups of people. This allows them to take steps to improve the fairness of the model, so that it works equally well for everyone, regardless of their individual characteristics or which device or organization they are a part of.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the Federated Fairness Analytics (FedFA) framework to quantify the fairness of machine learning models in federated learning settings. FedFA builds on existing fairness metrics, such as demographic parity and equalized odds, and adapts them to the federated learning context.

The key components of FedFA are:

  1. Fairness Metrics: FedFA computes standard fairness metrics like demographic parity and equalized odds, but does so in a federated manner by aggregating the metrics across client devices rather than using a centralized dataset.

  2. Federated Evaluation: FedFA conducts the fairness evaluation in a federated manner, where client devices compute local fairness metrics and send them to a central server for aggregation, without sharing raw data.

  3. Fairness-Aware Optimization: FedFA incorporates fairness objectives into the federated learning optimization process, enabling the global model to be trained in a more fair and equitable way.

The paper demonstrates the FedFA framework using experiments on two federated learning tasks: image classification and next-word prediction. The results show that FedFA can effectively identify and mitigate fairness disparities that arise in federated learning, such as differences in model performance across client groups.

Critical Analysis

The FedFA framework presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the field of federated learning, as it addresses an important and often overlooked issue of fairness. By providing a way to quantify fairness in federated settings, the framework enables researchers and practitioners to build more equitable and inclusive machine learning models.

One potential limitation of the FedFA approach is that it relies on the client devices to compute the local fairness metrics, which could be computationally expensive or infeasible for resource-constrained devices. The paper acknowledges this and suggests strategies to mitigate the computational burden, such as using approximate fairness metrics or delegating the fairness computation to a central server.

Additionally, the paper focuses on demographic fairness metrics, which may not capture all dimensions of fairness, such as intersectional fairness or fairness across different tasks or domains. Future research could explore extensions of the FedFA framework to address these more complex fairness considerations.

Conclusion

The Federated Fairness Analytics (FedFA) framework proposed in this paper is a significant step towards achieving fairness in federated learning. By providing a systematic way to measure and optimize for fairness in distributed machine learning settings, FedFA can help ensure that the benefits of federated learning are equitably distributed across different client groups and populations.

As the use of federated learning continues to grow, tools like FedFA will become increasingly important for building trustworthy and inclusive AI systems. This research underscores the importance of considering fairness as a key design principle in the development of federated learning technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Federated Fairness Analytics: Quantifying Fairness in Federated Learning
Total Score

0

Federated Fairness Analytics: Quantifying Fairness in Federated Learning

Oscar Dilley, Juan Marcelo Parra-Ullauri, Rasheed Hussain, Dimitra Simeonidou

Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-enhancing technology for distributed ML. By training models locally and aggregating updates - a federation learns together, while bypassing centralised data collection. FL is increasingly popular in healthcare, finance and personal computing. However, it inherits fairness challenges from classical ML and introduces new ones, resulting from differences in data quality, client participation, communication constraints, aggregation methods and underlying hardware. Fairness remains an unresolved issue in FL and the community has identified an absence of succinct definitions and metrics to quantify fairness; to address this, we propose Federated Fairness Analytics - a methodology for measuring fairness. Our definition of fairness comprises four notions with novel, corresponding metrics. They are symptomatically defined and leverage techniques originating from XAI, cooperative game-theory and networking engineering. We tested a range of experimental settings, varying the FL approach, ML task and data settings. The results show that statistical heterogeneity and client participation affect fairness and fairness conscious approaches such as Ditto and q-FedAvg marginally improve fairness-performance trade-offs. Using our techniques, FL practitioners can uncover previously unobtainable insights into their system's fairness, at differing levels of granularity in order to address fairness challenges in FL. We have open-sourced our work at: https://github.com/oscardilley/federated-fairness.

Read more

8/16/2024

Enhancing Group Fairness in Federated Learning through Personalization
Total Score

0

Enhancing Group Fairness in Federated Learning through Personalization

Yifan Yang, Ali Payani, Parinaz Naghizadeh

Personalized Federated Learning (FL) algorithms collaboratively train customized models for each client, enhancing the accuracy of the learned models on the client's local data (e.g., by clustering similar clients, or by fine-tuning models locally). In this paper, we investigate the impact of such personalization techniques on the group fairness of the learned models, and show that personalization can also lead to improved (local) fairness as an unintended benefit. We begin by illustrating these benefits of personalization through numerical experiments comparing two classes of personalized FL algorithms (clustering and fine-tuning) against a baseline FedAvg algorithm, elaborating on the reasons behind improved fairness using personalized FL, and then providing analytical support. Motivated by these, we further propose a new, Fairness-aware Federated Clustering Algorithm, Fair-FCA, in which clients can be clustered to obtain a (tuneable) fairness-accuracy tradeoff. Through numerical experiments, we demonstrate the ability of Fair-FCA to strike a balance between accuracy and fairness at the client level.

Read more

7/30/2024

🏋️

Total Score

0

Attacks on fairness in Federated Learning

Joseph Rance, Filip Svoboda

Federated Learning is an important emerging distributed training paradigm that keeps data private on clients. It is now well understood that by controlling only a small subset of FL clients, it is possible to introduce a backdoor to a federated learning model, in the presence of certain attributes. In this paper, we present a new type of attack that compromises the fairness of the trained model. Fairness is understood to be the attribute-level performance distribution of a trained model. It is particularly salient in domains where, for example, skewed accuracy discrimination between subpopulations could have disastrous consequences. We find that by employing a threat model similar to that of a backdoor attack, an attacker is able to influence the aggregated model to have an unfair performance distribution between any given set of attributes. Furthermore, we find that this attack is possible by controlling only a single client. While combating naturally induced unfairness in FL has previously been discussed in depth, its artificially induced kind has been neglected. We show that defending against attacks on fairness should be a critical consideration in any situation where unfairness in a trained model could benefit a user who participated in its training.

Read more

7/29/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

Fairness Without Demographics in Human-Centered Federated Learning

Shaily Roy, Harshit Sharma, Asif Salekin

Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training while preserving data privacy, making it suitable for decentralized human-centered AI applications. However, a significant research gap remains in ensuring fairness in these systems. Current fairness strategies in FL require knowledge of bias-creating/sensitive attributes, clashing with FL's privacy principles. Moreover, in human-centered datasets, sensitive attributes may remain latent. To tackle these challenges, we present a novel bias mitigation approach inspired by Fairness without Demographics in machine learning. The presented approach achieves fairness without needing knowledge of sensitive attributes by minimizing the top eigenvalue of the Hessian matrix during training, ensuring equitable loss landscapes across FL participants. Notably, we introduce a novel FL aggregation scheme that promotes participating models based on error rates and loss landscape curvature attributes, fostering fairness across the FL system. This work represents the first approach to attaining Fairness without Demographics in human-centered FL. Through comprehensive evaluation, our approach demonstrates effectiveness in balancing fairness and efficacy across various real-world applications, FL setups, and scenarios involving single and multiple bias-inducing factors, representing a significant advancement in human-centered FL.

Read more

5/17/2024