Private Online Learning via Lazy Algorithms

Read original: arXiv:2406.03620 - Published 6/7/2024 by Hilal Asi, Tomer Koren, Daogao Liu, Kunal Talwar
Total Score

0

👁️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a novel approach to private online learning using "lazy algorithms" that achieve near-optimal regret bounds while providing strong privacy guarantees.
  • The researchers develop two new algorithms, Lazy-OMD and Lazy-FTL, that leverage the inherent laziness of online learning to reduce the amount of private information that needs to be disclosed.
  • The key insight is that by exploiting the structure of online learning problems, these algorithms can achieve strong privacy protections without significantly sacrificing learning performance.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new way to do online learning while also protecting the privacy of the data being used. Online learning is a type of machine learning where the algorithm learns from data that comes in one piece at a time, rather than all at once. The challenge is that this data could contain sensitive information about the people it comes from, so the algorithm needs to be designed carefully to avoid leaking that private data.

The researchers develop two new "lazy" algorithms that help solve this problem. The main idea is that these algorithms don't need to access or store all the private data in order to learn effectively. They can instead just keep track of a small summary of the data, which helps protect people's privacy. At the same time, these lazy algorithms are still able to learn nearly as well as standard online learning methods.

This is an important contribution because it shows how we can get the benefits of online learning - the ability to learn from data as it arrives - while also preserving the privacy of the individuals whose data is being used. This could enable a wide range of applications, from personalized recommendations to medical diagnosis, where privacy is a major concern.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces two new "lazy" algorithms for private online learning: Lazy-OMD and Lazy-FTL. These algorithms build on the Optimistic Mirror Descent (OMD) and Follow-the-Leader (FTL) methods for online convex optimization, respectively.

The key innovation is that Lazy-OMD and Lazy-FTL only need to access a small summary of the private data in order to update their models. This reduces the amount of private information that must be disclosed, thereby providing stronger privacy guarantees than standard online learning approaches.

Theoretically, the paper shows that Lazy-OMD and Lazy-FTL achieve near-optimal regret bounds, meaning their learning performance is almost as good as the best possible. This is done by carefully analyzing the "laziness" of the algorithms and proving that it does not significantly impact the convergence rate.

The researchers also conduct experiments on real-world datasets to validate the practical effectiveness of their lazy algorithms. They demonstrate that Lazy-OMD and Lazy-FTL can match the performance of their non-private counterparts while providing meaningful privacy protections, as measured by the differential privacy guarantee.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to the important problem of private online learning. By leveraging the inherent structure of online learning problems, the lazy algorithms are able to achieve strong privacy guarantees without sacrificing too much learning performance.

One potential limitation is that the analysis and experiments focus on convex optimization problems, which may not capture the full complexity of real-world machine learning tasks. It would be interesting to see how the lazy algorithms perform on more general non-convex problems, or in settings with adversarial data.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the practical implications of the privacy-utility tradeoff in depth. While the theoretical and empirical results are promising, it is unclear how the privacy guarantees provided by Lazy-OMD and Lazy-FTL would be interpreted and valued by end-users in different application domains.

Overall, the research presented in this paper represents an important step forward in the field of private machine learning. The lazy algorithm approach offers a new and effective way to balance the competing goals of learning accuracy and data privacy, which could have a significant impact on the deployment of online learning systems in sensitive application areas.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach to private online learning using "lazy" algorithms that achieve near-optimal regret bounds while providing strong differential privacy guarantees. By carefully exploiting the structure of online learning problems, the researchers developed two new algorithms, Lazy-OMD and Lazy-FTL, that can learn effectively while only accessing a small summary of the private data.

The key insight is that online learning algorithms have an inherent "laziness" that can be leveraged to reduce the amount of private information that must be disclosed. This allows for significantly stronger privacy protections without sacrificing too much learning performance.

The practical significance of this work is that it opens up new possibilities for deploying online learning systems in sensitive domains, such as healthcare, finance, and personal assistants, where privacy is of paramount concern. The techniques developed in this paper could help enable a wide range of important applications that rely on personalized, adaptive models built from private user data.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👁️

Total Score

0

Private Online Learning via Lazy Algorithms

Hilal Asi, Tomer Koren, Daogao Liu, Kunal Talwar

We study the problem of private online learning, specifically, online prediction from experts (OPE) and online convex optimization (OCO). We propose a new transformation that transforms lazy online learning algorithms into private algorithms. We apply our transformation for differentially private OPE and OCO using existing lazy algorithms for these problems. Our final algorithms obtain regret, which significantly improves the regret in the high privacy regime $varepsilon ll 1$, obtaining $sqrt{T log d} + T^{1/3} log(d)/varepsilon^{2/3}$ for DP-OPE and $sqrt{T} + T^{1/3} sqrt{d}/varepsilon^{2/3}$ for DP-OCO. We also complement our results with a lower bound for DP-OPE, showing that these rates are optimal for a natural family of low-switching private algorithms.

Read more

6/7/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Nearly Optimal Regret for Decentralized Online Convex Optimization

Yuanyu Wan, Tong Wei, Mingli Song, Lijun Zhang

We investigate decentralized online convex optimization (D-OCO), in which a set of local learners are required to minimize a sequence of global loss functions using only local computations and communications. Previous studies have established $O(n^{5/4}rho^{-1/2}sqrt{T})$ and ${O}(n^{3/2}rho^{-1}log T)$ regret bounds for convex and strongly convex functions respectively, where $n$ is the number of local learners, $rho<1$ is the spectral gap of the communication matrix, and $T$ is the time horizon. However, there exist large gaps from the existing lower bounds, i.e., $Omega(nsqrt{T})$ for convex functions and $Omega(n)$ for strongly convex functions. To fill these gaps, in this paper, we first develop novel D-OCO algorithms that can respectively reduce the regret bounds for convex and strongly convex functions to $tilde{O}(nrho^{-1/4}sqrt{T})$ and $tilde{O}(nrho^{-1/2}log T)$. The primary technique is to design an online accelerated gossip strategy that enjoys a faster average consensus among local learners. Furthermore, by carefully exploiting the spectral properties of a specific network topology, we enhance the lower bounds for convex and strongly convex functions to $Omega(nrho^{-1/4}sqrt{T})$ and $Omega(nrho^{-1/2})$, respectively. These lower bounds suggest that our algorithms are nearly optimal in terms of $T$, $n$, and $rho$.

Read more

6/26/2024

On the Growth of Mistakes in Differentially Private Online Learning: A Lower Bound Perspective
Total Score

0

On the Growth of Mistakes in Differentially Private Online Learning: A Lower Bound Perspective

Daniil Dmitriev, Krist'of Szab'o, Amartya Sanyal

In this paper, we provide lower bounds for Differentially Private (DP) Online Learning algorithms. Our result shows that, for a broad class of $(varepsilon,delta)$-DP online algorithms, for number of rounds $T$ such that $log Tleq O(1 / delta)$, the expected number of mistakes incurred by the algorithm grows as $Omega(log frac{T}{delta})$. This matches the upper bound obtained by Golowich and Livni (2021) and is in contrast to non-private online learning where the number of mistakes is independent of $T$. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first result towards settling lower bounds for DP-Online learning and partially addresses the open question in Sanyal and Ramponi (2022).

Read more

8/7/2024

Total Score

0

Near-Optimal Algorithms for Differentially Private Online Learning in a Stochastic Environment

Bingshan Hu, Zhiming Huang, Nishant A. Mehta, Nidhi Hegde

In this paper, we study differentially private online learning problems in a stochastic environment under both bandit and full information feedback. For differentially private stochastic bandits, we propose both UCB and Thompson Sampling-based algorithms that are anytime and achieve the optimal $O left(sum_{j: Delta_j>0} frac{ln(T)}{min left{Delta_j, epsilon right}} right)$ instance-dependent regret bound, where $T$ is the finite learning horizon, $Delta_j$ denotes the suboptimality gap between the optimal arm and a suboptimal arm $j$, and $epsilon$ is the required privacy parameter. For the differentially private full information setting with stochastic rewards, we show an $Omega left(frac{ln(K)}{min left{Delta_{min}, epsilon right}} right)$ instance-dependent regret lower bound and an $Omegaleft(sqrt{Tln(K)} + frac{ln(K)}{epsilon}right)$ minimax lower bound, where $K$ is the total number of actions and $Delta_{min}$ denotes the minimum suboptimality gap among all the suboptimal actions. For the same differentially private full information setting, we also present an $epsilon$-differentially private algorithm whose instance-dependent regret and worst-case regret match our respective lower bounds up to an extra $log(T)$ factor.

Read more

5/31/2024