Probabilistic Conceptual Explainers: Trustworthy Conceptual Explanations for Vision Foundation Models
2406.12649
0
0
Abstract
Vision transformers (ViTs) have emerged as a significant area of focus, particularly for their capacity to be jointly trained with large language models and to serve as robust vision foundation models. Yet, the development of trustworthy explanation methods for ViTs has lagged, particularly in the context of post-hoc interpretations of ViT predictions. Existing sub-image selection approaches, such as feature-attribution and conceptual models, fall short in this regard. This paper proposes five desiderata for explaining ViTs -- faithfulness, stability, sparsity, multi-level structure, and parsimony -- and demonstrates the inadequacy of current methods in meeting these criteria comprehensively. We introduce a variational Bayesian explanation framework, dubbed ProbAbilistic Concept Explainers (PACE), which models the distributions of patch embeddings to provide trustworthy post-hoc conceptual explanations. Our qualitative analysis reveals the distributions of patch-level concepts, elucidating the effectiveness of ViTs by modeling the joint distribution of patch embeddings and ViT's predictions. Moreover, these patch-level explanations bridge the gap between image-level and dataset-level explanations, thus completing the multi-level structure of PACE. Through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, we demonstrate that PACE surpasses state-of-the-art methods in terms of the defined desiderata.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces Probabilistic Conceptual Explainers (PCEs), a new approach to providing trustworthy conceptual explanations for vision foundation models.
- PCEs aim to address the limitations of existing explainability methods by considering the inherent uncertainty in the model's reasoning and generating conceptual explanations that convey this uncertainty.
- The proposed PCE framework incorporates probabilistic modeling to capture the uncertainty in the model's conceptual associations and produces explanations that reflect this uncertainty.
Plain English Explanation
Artificial intelligence (AI) models, especially those used for computer vision tasks, have become increasingly powerful and complex. However, as these models become more sophisticated, it becomes harder to understand how they arrive at their predictions. Improving Interpretation Faithfulness of Vision Transformers and Faithfulness of Vision Transformer Explanations have explored ways to make AI model explanations more transparent and trustworthy.
This paper takes a different approach, focusing on "conceptual explanations" - explanations that describe the high-level concepts the model is using to make its decisions. The authors argue that Estimation of Concept Explanations Should be Uncertainty-Aware and propose a new framework called Probabilistic Conceptual Explainers (PCEs) to generate these types of explanations.
The key idea behind PCEs is to model the uncertainty in the model's conceptual associations. Instead of providing a single, deterministic explanation, PCEs generate a probability distribution over possible conceptual explanations. This allows the explanations to convey the inherent uncertainty in the model's reasoning, making them more trustworthy and informative for users.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of PCEs on various computer vision tasks, showing that their approach can generate explanations that are more faithful to the model's decision-making process compared to existing methods. By incorporating uncertainty into the explanations, PCEs provide a more nuanced and realistic view of how the AI model is operating.
Technical Explanation
The Probabilistic Conceptual Explainers (PCEs) framework proposed in this paper aims to generate trustworthy conceptual explanations for vision foundation models, such as PROTOS-ViT: Visual Foundation Models with Sparse Self-Attention and Explaining Explainability: Understanding Concept Activation Vectors.
The key innovation of PCEs is the incorporation of probabilistic modeling to capture the inherent uncertainty in the model's conceptual associations. Instead of providing a single, deterministic explanation, PCEs generate a probability distribution over possible conceptual explanations.
The PCE framework consists of three main components:
- Concept Extraction: This step identifies the relevant high-level concepts that the vision model uses to make its predictions.
- Concept Association Modeling: A probabilistic model is trained to capture the uncertainty in the relationship between the input features and the extracted concepts.
- Conceptual Explanation Generation: Given an input, the probabilistic model is used to generate a probability distribution over the possible conceptual explanations, reflecting the uncertainty in the model's reasoning.
The authors evaluate the PCE framework on various computer vision tasks, including image classification and segmentation. They demonstrate that the probabilistic conceptual explanations generated by PCEs are more faithful to the model's decision-making process compared to existing explainability methods, which often provide deterministic and potentially misleading explanations.
Critical Analysis
The Probabilistic Conceptual Explainers (PCEs) proposed in this paper represent an important step forward in the field of AI explainability. By incorporating uncertainty into the conceptual explanations, the authors address a key limitation of existing approaches, which often fail to convey the inherent ambiguity in the model's reasoning.
One potential concern is the computational complexity of the PCE framework, as the probabilistic modeling and explanation generation steps may be resource-intensive, especially for large-scale vision models. The authors do not provide detailed performance metrics or scalability analysis, which would be helpful for understanding the practical applicability of their approach.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the technical aspects of the PCE framework and its evaluation on standard computer vision benchmarks. While these results are valuable, it would be interesting to see how PCEs perform in real-world, high-stakes applications where trustworthy explanations are particularly critical. Improving Interpretation Faithfulness of Vision Transformers and Faithfulness of Vision Transformer Explanations have explored these types of use cases, and it would be beneficial to understand how PCEs could be applied in similar contexts.
Finally, the paper does not delve into the interpretability and understandability of the probabilistic conceptual explanations from the user's perspective. Conducting user studies to assess the effectiveness and usability of PCEs would provide valuable insights and help strengthen the overall approach.
Conclusion
The Probabilistic Conceptual Explainers (PCEs) proposed in this paper represent a significant advancement in the field of AI explainability. By incorporating uncertainty into the conceptual explanations, PCEs provide a more nuanced and trustworthy understanding of how vision foundation models arrive at their predictions.
The key contribution of this work is the recognition that existing deterministic explanations often fail to capture the inherent ambiguity in the model's reasoning. The PCE framework addresses this limitation by generating probability distributions over possible conceptual explanations, reflecting the uncertainty in the model's conceptual associations.
While the technical implementation of PCEs may have some practical challenges, the underlying principles and insights presented in this paper have the potential to inspire further research and development in the area of trustworthy AI explanations. As AI models continue to grow in complexity and become more widely deployed, approaches like PCEs will be crucial for building user trust and ensuring the responsible and transparent use of these powerful technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👀
Improving Interpretation Faithfulness for Vision Transformers
Lijie Hu, Yixin Liu, Ninghao Liu, Mengdi Huai, Lichao Sun, Di Wang
0
0
Vision Transformers (ViTs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance for various vision tasks. One reason behind the success lies in their ability to provide plausible innate explanations for the behavior of neural architectures. However, ViTs suffer from issues with explanation faithfulness, as their focal points are fragile to adversarial attacks and can be easily changed with even slight perturbations on the input image. In this paper, we propose a rigorous approach to mitigate these issues by introducing Faithful ViTs (FViTs). Briefly speaking, an FViT should have the following two properties: (1) The top-$k$ indices of its self-attention vector should remain mostly unchanged under input perturbation, indicating stable explanations; (2) The prediction distribution should be robust to perturbations. To achieve this, we propose a new method called Denoised Diffusion Smoothing (DDS), which adopts randomized smoothing and diffusion-based denoising. We theoretically prove that processing ViTs directly with DDS can turn them into FViTs. We also show that Gaussian noise is nearly optimal for both $ell_2$ and $ell_infty$-norm cases. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through comprehensive experiments and evaluations. Results show that FViTs are more robust against adversarial attacks while maintaining the explainability of attention, indicating higher faithfulness.
5/6/2024
Estimation of Concept Explanations Should be Uncertainty Aware
Vihari Piratla, Juyeon Heo, Katherine M. Collins, Sukriti Singh, Adrian Weller
0
0
Model explanations can be valuable for interpreting and debugging predictive models. We study a specific kind called Concept Explanations, where the goal is to interpret a model using human-understandable concepts. Although popular for their easy interpretation, concept explanations are known to be noisy. We begin our work by identifying various sources of uncertainty in the estimation pipeline that lead to such noise. We then propose an uncertainty-aware Bayesian estimation method to address these issues, which readily improved the quality of explanations. We demonstrate with theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation that explanations computed by our method are robust to train-time choices while also being label-efficient. Further, our method proved capable of recovering relevant concepts amongst a bank of thousands, in an evaluation with real-datasets and off-the-shelf models, demonstrating its scalability. We believe the improved quality of uncertainty-aware concept explanations make them a strong candidate for more reliable model interpretation. We release our code at https://github.com/vps-anonconfs/uace.
4/8/2024
On the Faithfulness of Vision Transformer Explanations
Junyi Wu, Weitai Kang, Hao Tang, Yuan Hong, Yan Yan
0
0
To interpret Vision Transformers, post-hoc explanations assign salience scores to input pixels, providing human-understandable heatmaps. However, whether these interpretations reflect true rationales behind the model's output is still underexplored. To address this gap, we study the faithfulness criterion of explanations: the assigned salience scores should represent the influence of the corresponding input pixels on the model's predictions. To evaluate faithfulness, we introduce Salience-guided Faithfulness Coefficient (SaCo), a novel evaluation metric leveraging essential information of salience distribution. Specifically, we conduct pair-wise comparisons among distinct pixel groups and then aggregate the differences in their salience scores, resulting in a coefficient that indicates the explanation's degree of faithfulness. Our explorations reveal that current metrics struggle to differentiate between advanced explanation methods and Random Attribution, thereby failing to capture the faithfulness property. In contrast, our proposed SaCo offers a reliable faithfulness measurement, establishing a robust metric for interpretations. Furthermore, our SaCo demonstrates that the use of gradient and multi-layer aggregation can markedly enhance the faithfulness of attention-based explanation, shedding light on potential paths for advancing Vision Transformer explainability.
4/3/2024
📈
ProtoS-ViT: Visual foundation models for sparse self-explainable classifications
Hugues Turb'e, Mina Bjelogrlic, Gianmarco Mengaldo, Christian Lovis
0
0
Prototypical networks aim to build intrinsically explainable models based on the linear summation of concepts. However, important challenges remain in the transparency, compactness, and meaningfulness of the explanations provided by these models. This work demonstrates how frozen pre-trained ViT backbones can be effectively turned into prototypical models for both general and domain-specific tasks, in our case biomedical image classifiers. By leveraging strong spatial features combined with a novel prototypical head, ProtoS-ViT surpasses existing prototypical models showing strong performance in terms of accuracy, compactness, and explainability. Model explainability is evaluated through an extensive set of quantitative and qualitative metrics which serve as a general benchmark for the development of prototypical models. Code is available at https://github.com/hturbe/protosvit.
6/17/2024