Problem Solving Through Human-AI Preference-Based Cooperation

Read original: arXiv:2408.07461 - Published 8/16/2024 by Subhabrata Dutta, Timo Kaufmann, Goran Glavav{s}, Ivan Habernal, Kristian Kersting, Frauke Kreuter, Mira Mezini, Iryna Gurevych, Eyke Hullermeier, Hinrich Schuetze
Total Score

0

Problem Solving Through Human-AI Preference-Based Cooperation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores how human-AI collaboration can help solve complex problems through a preference-based approach.
  • The researchers investigate how humans and AI systems can work together effectively by incorporating human preferences into the problem-solving process.
  • The study examines the challenges and opportunities of this human-AI partnership and provides insights into designing more successful collaborative systems.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how humans and artificial intelligence (AI) can team up to tackle difficult problems. The key idea is to incorporate the preferences and values of humans directly into the problem-solving process, rather than having the AI work independently.

By involving humans in the loop, the researchers believe the AI can produce solutions that better align with what people actually want. This preference-based approach aims to harness the complementary strengths of humans and machines - the creativity and contextual understanding of people, combined with the speed and analytical power of AI.

The paper examines the challenges of making this human-AI collaboration work effectively. For example, how can the AI system efficiently learn and represent human preferences? How can the interaction between humans and AI be designed to be productive and intuitive? The researchers provide insights into addressing these challenges and designing more successful cooperative AI systems that leverage the unique capabilities of both people and machines.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a preference-based approach to human-AI collaboration for problem solving. The core idea is to directly incorporate human preferences and values into the AI's decision-making process, rather than having the AI work independently and then present its solutions to humans.

To achieve this, the researchers developed a framework where the human and AI system engage in an iterative feedback loop. The human provides preferences and feedback on candidate solutions proposed by the AI. The AI then learns from this input and generates new, improved solutions that better align with the human's preferences.

Through experiments, the researchers demonstrate that this preference-based approach leads to solutions that are more satisfactory to the human compared to an AI working alone. The paper also analyzes the interaction dynamics between the human and AI, identifying key challenges such as eliciting meaningful preferences from humans and designing intuitive interfaces for the collaborative workflow.

Overall, the work provides insights into how to harness the complementary strengths of humans and machines to tackle complex problems through cooperative AI systems that adapt to user preferences.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling vision for human-AI collaboration, but also acknowledges several important limitations and areas for further research.

One key challenge is the difficulty of accurately and efficiently eliciting human preferences, especially for problems with many potential solutions. The paper's experiments relied on relatively simple preference tasks, but scaling this to more open-ended, real-world problems may require advances in preference learning and interaction design.

Additionally, the work focuses on a single human working with a single AI system. Extending this to teams of humans and AI introduces new coordination and communication challenges that the current framework does not address.

Further research is also needed to better understand the long-term effects of this type of human-AI partnership. For example, how does the AI's learning and decision-making evolve over extended interactions? And what are the implications for human agency and autonomy when an AI system has significant influence over problem-solving outcomes?

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by demonstrating the potential benefits of preference-based human-AI collaboration. However, realizing this vision in practice will require continued innovation to address the technical, social, and ethical complexities involved.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to human-AI collaboration for problem solving, where the AI system directly incorporates human preferences and values into its decision-making process. Through experiments, the researchers show that this preference-based approach can lead to solutions that are more satisfactory to the human user compared to an AI working alone.

The work provides important insights into the challenges and opportunities of designing effective cooperative AI systems that leverage the unique strengths of both humans and machines. By focusing on aligning the AI's outputs with human preferences, the researchers aim to create AI assistants that are more intuitive, trustworthy, and beneficial to people.

While the current framework has limitations, this paper lays the groundwork for further advancements in human-AI collaboration that could have significant implications for how we approach complex problem-solving in the future.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Problem Solving Through Human-AI Preference-Based Cooperation
Total Score

0

Problem Solving Through Human-AI Preference-Based Cooperation

Subhabrata Dutta, Timo Kaufmann, Goran Glavav{s}, Ivan Habernal, Kristian Kersting, Frauke Kreuter, Mira Mezini, Iryna Gurevych, Eyke Hullermeier, Hinrich Schuetze

While there is a widespread belief that artificial general intelligence (AGI) -- or even superhuman AI -- is imminent, complex problems in expert domains are far from being solved. We argue that such problems require human-AI cooperation and that the current state of the art in generative AI is unable to play the role of a reliable partner due to a multitude of shortcomings, including inability to keep track of a complex solution artifact (e.g., a software program), limited support for versatile human preference expression and lack of adapting to human preference in an interactive setting. To address these challenges, we propose HAI-Co2, a novel human-AI co-construction framework. We formalize HAI-Co2 and discuss the difficult open research problems that it faces. Finally, we present a case study of HAI-Co2 and demonstrate its efficacy compared to monolithic generative AI models.

Read more

8/16/2024

Deconstructing Human-AI Collaboration: Agency, Interaction, and Adaptation
Total Score

0

Deconstructing Human-AI Collaboration: Agency, Interaction, and Adaptation

Steffen Holter, Mennatallah El-Assady

As full AI-based automation remains out of reach in most real-world applications, the focus has instead shifted to leveraging the strengths of both human and AI agents, creating effective collaborative systems. The rapid advances in this area have yielded increasingly more complex systems and frameworks, while the nuance of their characterization has gotten more vague. Similarly, the existing conceptual models no longer capture the elaborate processes of these systems nor describe the entire scope of their collaboration paradigms. In this paper, we propose a new unified set of dimensions through which to analyze and describe human-AI systems. Our conceptual model is centered around three high-level aspects - agency, interaction, and adaptation - and is developed through a multi-step process. Firstly, an initial design space is proposed by surveying the literature and consolidating existing definitions and conceptual frameworks. Secondly, this model is iteratively refined and validated by conducting semi-structured interviews with nine researchers in this field. Lastly, to illustrate the applicability of our design space, we utilize it to provide a structured description of selected human-AI systems.

Read more

4/19/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Warmth and competence in human-agent cooperation

Kevin R. McKee, Xuechunzi Bai, Susan T. Fiske

Interaction and cooperation with humans are overarching aspirations of artificial intelligence (AI) research. Recent studies demonstrate that AI agents trained with deep reinforcement learning are capable of collaborating with humans. These studies primarily evaluate human compatibility through objective metrics such as task performance, obscuring potential variation in the levels of trust and subjective preference that different agents garner. To better understand the factors shaping subjective preferences in human-agent cooperation, we train deep reinforcement learning agents in Coins, a two-player social dilemma. We recruit $N = 501$ participants for a human-agent cooperation study and measure their impressions of the agents they encounter. Participants' perceptions of warmth and competence predict their stated preferences for different agents, above and beyond objective performance metrics. Drawing inspiration from social science and biology research, we subsequently implement a new ``partner choice'' framework to elicit revealed preferences: after playing an episode with an agent, participants are asked whether they would like to play the next episode with the same agent or to play alone. As with stated preferences, social perception better predicts participants' revealed preferences than does objective performance. Given these results, we recommend human-agent interaction researchers routinely incorporate the measurement of social perception and subjective preferences into their studies.

Read more

5/10/2024

Negotiating the Shared Agency between Humans & AI in the Recommender System
Total Score

0

Negotiating the Shared Agency between Humans & AI in the Recommender System

Mengke Wu, Weizi Liu, Yanyun Wang, Mike Yao

Smart recommendation algorithms have revolutionized information dissemination, enhancing efficiency and reshaping content delivery across various domains. However, concerns about user agency have arisen due to the inherent opacity (information asymmetry) and the nature of one-way output (power asymmetry) on algorithms. While both issues have been criticized by scholars via advocating explainable AI (XAI) and human-AI collaborative decision-making (HACD), few research evaluates their integrated effects on users, and few HACD discussions in recommender systems beyond improving and filtering the results. This study proposes an incubating idea as a missing step in HACD that allows users to control the degrees of AI-recommended content. Then, we integrate it with existing XAI to a flow prototype aimed at assessing the enhancement of user agency. We seek to understand how types of agency impact user perception and experience, and bring empirical evidence to refine the guidelines and designs for human-AI interactive systems.

Read more

4/23/2024