ProCIS: A Benchmark for Proactive Retrieval in Conversations

Overview

• This paper explores the emerging field of proactive conversational information seeking, where AI systems can monitor human conversations and proactively provide useful information or recommendations.
• The paper introduces a large-scale dataset called ProCIS that can be used to develop and evaluate these proactive conversational systems.
• The dataset contains over 2.8 million conversations, with annotations that indicate which parts of the conversation are relevant to different documents.
• The paper also proposes a new evaluation metric called normalized proactive discounted cumulative gain (npDCG) to assess the performance of proactive retrieval systems.

Plain English Explanation

Conversational information seeking is a rapidly growing field that is changing how we interact with search engines. Instead of just typing in queries, we can now have natural language conversations with search systems to find the information we need.

However, most existing systems are reactive, meaning they only respond to each individual query from the user. The researchers identified a gap in building proactive conversational systems that can actively monitor a conversation and provide useful information or suggestions at the right moment.

To address this, the researchers created a large dataset of over 2.8 million conversations. They used crowdsourcing to carefully annotate which parts of each conversation were relevant to different documents. This allows proactive retrieval systems to be developed and evaluated on their ability to identify relevant information to share during a conversation.

The researchers also introduced a new metric called npDCG to assess the performance of these proactive systems. This metric looks at how useful and timely the system's suggestions are, rewarding it for providing relevant information at the right moment.

By making this dataset and evaluation method publicly available, the researchers hope to spur further progress in building proactive conversational information seeking systems that can seamlessly assist people during natural discussions.

Technical Explanation

The key contribution of this paper is the introduction of the ProCIS dataset for developing and evaluating proactive conversational information seeking systems. The dataset consists of over 2.8 million conversations, along with annotations indicating which parts of each conversation are relevant to different documents.

To create these relevance annotations, the researchers conducted crowdsourcing experiments using depth-k pooling. This involved having human raters assess the relevance of a subset of documents for each conversation, which allowed the researchers to infer the relevance of a broader set of documents.

The paper also proposes a new evaluation metric called normalized proactive discounted cumulative gain (npDCG) to assess the performance of proactive retrieval systems. This metric considers not only the relevance of the retrieved information, but also how timely and useful it is in the context of the ongoing conversation.

In addition to introducing the dataset and evaluation metric, the researchers provide benchmark results for a range of models, including a novel architecture they developed specifically for this proactive retrieval task. These results demonstrate the value of the ProCIS dataset and npDCG metric in driving progress in this emerging field.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have made a valuable contribution by creating the ProCIS dataset and npDCG evaluation metric, which can help spur further advancements in proactive conversational information seeking. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for improvement:

1. The dataset is focused on English-language conversations, so its applicability to other languages may be limited. Expanding the dataset to cover more diverse linguistic and cultural contexts could broaden its impact.
2. The depth-k pooling approach used to obtain relevance annotations may introduce some bias, as it relies on a subset of raters. Exploring alternative annotation strategies, such as collaborative filtering or mixed-initiative query reformulation, could help address this.
3. The npDCG metric, while innovative, may not capture all the nuances of proactive information retrieval. Comparing it to other evaluation methods, such as those used in the TREC IKAT 2023 test collection, could provide valuable insights.

Overall, the ProCIS dataset and npDCG metric represent an important step forward in enabling the development of more advanced proactive conversational information seeking systems. As the field continues to evolve, ongoing research and critical analysis will be essential to further refine these tools and drive progress.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel dataset and evaluation metric for the emerging field of proactive conversational information seeking. By providing a large-scale dataset of annotated conversations and a new metric to assess the timeliness and relevance of proactive information retrieval, the researchers have laid the groundwork for developing more intelligent and useful conversational AI systems.

As conversational interfaces become increasingly ubiquitous in our daily lives, the ability of AI agents to proactively engage in discussions and provide relevant information will be crucial. The ProCIS dataset and npDCG metric represent an important step towards realizing this vision, and the researchers' work could have significant implications for how we interact with technology in the future.