Comparative Analysis of Retrieval Systems in the Real World

Read original: arXiv:2405.02048 - Published 5/6/2024 by Dmytro Mozolevskyi, Waseem AlShikh
Total Score

0

🔍

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper explores the integration of advanced language models with search and retrieval systems in the fields of information retrieval and natural language processing.
  • The goal is to evaluate and compare various state-of-the-art methods based on their performance in terms of accuracy and efficiency.
  • The analysis covers different combinations of technologies, including Azure Cognitive Search Retriever with GPT-4, Pinecone's Canopy framework, Langchain with Pinecone and different language models, LlamaIndex with Weaviate Vector Store's hybrid search, Google's RAG implementation on Cloud VertexAI-Search, Amazon SageMaker's RAG, and a novel approach called KG-FID Retrieval.
  • The motivation for this analysis is the increasing demand for robust and responsive question-answering systems in various domains.
  • The RobustQA metric is used to evaluate the performance of these systems under diverse paraphrasing of questions.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines different ways to combine powerful language models, like GPT-4, with search and retrieval systems. The goal is to find the best methods for building AI-powered question-answering tools that can understand and respond to a variety of questions accurately and efficiently.

The researchers tested several approaches, including using Azure's search technology with GPT-4, Pinecone's Canopy framework, and language models from OpenAI and Cohere. They also looked at using LlamaIndex with Weaviate's hybrid search, Google's Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) on their cloud platform, Amazon's RAG implementation, and a new method called KG-FID Retrieval.

The motivation for this work is the growing demand for smart, versatile question-answering systems that can be used in many different fields. To evaluate the performance of these systems, the researchers used a metric called RobustQA, which measures how well they can handle questions phrased in different ways.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of integrating advanced language models, such as GPT-4, with search and retrieval systems. The researchers explored various state-of-the-art methods, including:

  • Azure Cognitive Search Retriever with GPT-4: Combining Microsoft's enterprise-level search technology with the powerful language understanding capabilities of GPT-4.
  • Pinecone's Canopy framework: A modern vector-based search and retrieval system designed for use with large language models.
  • Langchain with Pinecone and different language models: Combining the Langchain framework for building AI applications with Pinecone's search and the language models from OpenAI and Cohere.
  • LlamaIndex with Weaviate Vector Store's hybrid search: Integrating the LlamaIndex library for working with large language models with Weaviate's hybrid search approach.
  • Google's RAG implementation on Cloud VertexAI-Search: Utilizing Google's Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technique on their cloud-based search and AI platform.
  • Amazon SageMaker's RAG: Amazon's implementation of the RAG method for their cloud-based machine learning service.
  • KG-FID Retrieval: A novel approach developed by the researchers for combining knowledge graphs and language models in a retrieval-based system.

The RobustQA metric was used to evaluate the performance of these systems under diverse paraphrasing of questions, which is crucial for building reliable and responsive question-answering systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the various methods for integrating language models with search and retrieval systems. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be considered:

  1. Scope of Evaluation: While the paper covers a wide range of technologies, there may be other promising approaches or combinations that were not included in the analysis. Expanding the scope of the evaluation could provide a more complete picture of the state of the art in this field.

  2. Real-World Deployment Challenges: The paper focuses primarily on the technical performance of the systems under the RobustQA metric. More research is needed to understand the practical challenges and considerations for deploying these technologies in real-world applications, such as integration with existing systems, scalability, and user experience.

  3. Ethical Considerations: As the use of advanced language models in search and retrieval systems becomes more prevalent, it is crucial to carefully consider the ethical implications, such as bias, privacy, and the potential for misuse. The paper could have provided a more in-depth discussion of these important issues.

  4. Evolving Landscape: The field of AI-driven search and retrieval is rapidly evolving, with new models and techniques constantly emerging. Future research should aim to keep pace with these advancements and provide updated evaluations to ensure the findings remain relevant.

Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the understanding of the integration of language models and search/retrieval systems. By highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of various approaches, it can help guide researchers and practitioners in making informed decisions when developing AI-powered search and question-answering solutions.

Conclusion

This research paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the integration of advanced language models, such as GPT-4, with search and retrieval systems. The researchers evaluated and compared a wide range of state-of-the-art methods, including Azure Cognitive Search, Pinecone's Canopy, Langchain, LlamaIndex, Google's RAG, Amazon SageMaker's RAG, and a novel approach called KG-FID Retrieval.

The motivation for this work is the growing demand for robust and responsive question-answering systems across various domains. The researchers used the RobustQA metric to evaluate the performance of these systems under diverse paraphrasing of questions, which is a crucial aspect of building reliable and versatile AI-driven search and retrieval solutions.

The findings of this paper offer valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working on the intersection of language models and search/retrieval technologies. By highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches, the paper can inform the development and deployment of advanced question-answering systems that can meet the evolving needs of users and organizations.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔍

Total Score

0

Comparative Analysis of Retrieval Systems in the Real World

Dmytro Mozolevskyi, Waseem AlShikh

This research paper presents a comprehensive analysis of integrating advanced language models with search and retrieval systems in the fields of information retrieval and natural language processing. The objective is to evaluate and compare various state-of-the-art methods based on their performance in terms of accuracy and efficiency. The analysis explores different combinations of technologies, including Azure Cognitive Search Retriever with GPT-4, Pinecone's Canopy framework, Langchain with Pinecone and different language models (OpenAI, Cohere), LlamaIndex with Weaviate Vector Store's hybrid search, Google's RAG implementation on Cloud VertexAI-Search, Amazon SageMaker's RAG, and a novel approach called KG-FID Retrieval. The motivation for this analysis arises from the increasing demand for robust and responsive question-answering systems in various domains. The RobustQA metric is used to evaluate the performance of these systems under diverse paraphrasing of questions. The report aims to provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each method, facilitating informed decisions in the deployment and development of AI-driven search and retrieval systems.

Read more

5/6/2024

🧪

Total Score

0

A Multi-Source Retrieval Question Answering Framework Based on RAG

Ridong Wu, Shuhong Chen, Xiangbiao Su, Yuankai Zhu, Yifei Liao, Jianming Wu

With the rapid development of large-scale language models, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has been widely adopted. However, existing RAG paradigms are inevitably influenced by erroneous retrieval information, thereby reducing the reliability and correctness of generated results. Therefore, to improve the relevance of retrieval information, this study proposes a method that replaces traditional retrievers with GPT-3.5, leveraging its vast corpus knowledge to generate retrieval information. We also propose a web retrieval based method to implement fine-grained knowledge retrieval, Utilizing the powerful reasoning capability of GPT-3.5 to realize semantic partitioning of problem.In order to mitigate the illusion of GPT retrieval and reduce noise in Web retrieval,we proposes a multi-source retrieval framework, named MSRAG, which combines GPT retrieval with web retrieval. Experiments on multiple knowledge-intensive QA datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework in this study performs better than existing RAG framework in enhancing the overall efficiency and accuracy of QA systems.

Read more

5/30/2024

Total Score

0

Evaluating the Retrieval Component in LLM-Based Question Answering Systems

Ashkan Alinejad, Krtin Kumar, Ali Vahdat

Question answering systems (QA) utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) heavily depend on the retrieval component to provide them with domain-specific information and reduce the risk of generating inaccurate responses or hallucinations. Although the evaluation of retrievers dates back to the early research in Information Retrieval, assessing their performance within LLM-based chatbots remains a challenge. This study proposes a straightforward baseline for evaluating retrievers in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based chatbots. Our findings demonstrate that this evaluation framework provides a better image of how the retriever performs and is more aligned with the overall performance of the QA system. Although conventional metrics such as precision, recall, and F1 score may not fully capture LLMs' capabilities - as they can yield accurate responses despite imperfect retrievers - our method considers LLMs' strengths to ignore irrelevant contexts, as well as potential errors and hallucinations in their responses.

Read more

6/11/2024

💬

Total Score

1

Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Survey

Yutao Zhu, Huaying Yuan, Shuting Wang, Jiongnan Liu, Wenhan Liu, Chenlong Deng, Haonan Chen, Zheng Liu, Zhicheng Dou, Ji-Rong Wen

As a primary means of information acquisition, information retrieval (IR) systems, such as search engines, have integrated themselves into our daily lives. These systems also serve as components of dialogue, question-answering, and recommender systems. The trajectory of IR has evolved dynamically from its origins in term-based methods to its integration with advanced neural models. While the neural models excel at capturing complex contextual signals and semantic nuances, thereby reshaping the IR landscape, they still face challenges such as data scarcity, interpretability, and the generation of contextually plausible yet potentially inaccurate responses. This evolution requires a combination of both traditional methods (such as term-based sparse retrieval methods with rapid response) and modern neural architectures (such as language models with powerful language understanding capacity). Meanwhile, the emergence of large language models (LLMs), typified by ChatGPT and GPT-4, has revolutionized natural language processing due to their remarkable language understanding, generation, generalization, and reasoning abilities. Consequently, recent research has sought to leverage LLMs to improve IR systems. Given the rapid evolution of this research trajectory, it is necessary to consolidate existing methodologies and provide nuanced insights through a comprehensive overview. In this survey, we delve into the confluence of LLMs and IR systems, including crucial aspects such as query rewriters, retrievers, rerankers, and readers. Additionally, we explore promising directions, such as search agents, within this expanding field.

Read more

9/5/2024