PROMPTFUZZ: Harnessing Fuzzing Techniques for Robust Testing of Prompt Injection in LLMs

Read original: arXiv:2409.14729 - Published 9/24/2024 by Jiahao Yu, Yangguang Shao, Hanwen Miao, Junzheng Shi, Xinyu Xing

🧪

Overview

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful text-generation tools with many applications.
However, they are vulnerable to "prompt injection attacks," where malicious prompts can manipulate the generated text.
Ensuring LLMs are robust against such attacks is crucial for their real-world deployment, especially in critical tasks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a novel testing framework called PROMPTFUZZ that uses fuzzing techniques to evaluate the robustness of LLMs against prompt injection attacks. Fuzzing is a software testing method that generates random or semi-random inputs to find vulnerabilities.

Similarly, PROMPTFUZZ selects promising initial prompts and generates diverse, high-quality prompt injections to test the target LLM's resilience. The framework operates in two stages: the "prepare" phase, which selects seed prompts and collects few-shot examples, and the "focus" phase, which uses the collected examples to generate more effective prompt injections.

By deploying the attack prompts generated by PROMPTFUZZ in a real-world competition, the researchers achieved a top 0.14% ranking out of over 4,000 participants. They also used the framework to construct a dataset to fine-tune LLMs for improved robustness against prompt injection attacks, though PROMPTFUZZ was still able to identify vulnerabilities in the fine-tuned model.

The paper emphasizes the critical need for effective testing tools to evaluate and improve the robustness of LLMs against potential security threats like prompt injection attacks.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents PROMPTFUZZ, a novel testing framework that leverages fuzzing techniques to systematically assess the robustness of LLMs against prompt injection attacks.

The framework operates in two stages:

Prepare Phase: This stage selects promising initial seed prompts and collects few-shot examples to be used in the next phase.
Focus Phase: This stage uses the collected examples to generate diverse, high-quality prompt injections to evaluate the target LLM's resilience.

The researchers deployed the attack prompts generated by PROMPTFUZZ in a real-world competition, where they achieved a 7th-place ranking out of over 4,000 participants (top 0.14%) within 2 hours.

Additionally, the researchers constructed a dataset using the PROMPTFUZZ framework and used it to fine-tune LLMs for enhanced robustness against prompt injection attacks. However, even the fine-tuned model was still vulnerable to the prompt injections generated by PROMPTFUZZ, highlighting the importance of robust testing for LLMs.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution to the field by introducing a practical framework for evaluating the robustness of LLMs against prompt injection attacks. The use of fuzzing techniques to systematically generate diverse prompt injections is a clever approach that can uncover vulnerabilities that may be missed by manual testing.

However, the paper does not address the potential limitations of the PROMPTFUZZ framework. For example, the effectiveness of the framework may be influenced by the quality and diversity of the initial seed prompts and few-shot examples used in the prepare phase. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational resources and time required to run the PROMPTFUZZ testing process, which could be a significant practical concern for large-scale LLM deployments.

Furthermore, the paper does not explore the implications of the identified vulnerabilities beyond the prompt injection attack scenario. It would be valuable to understand how these vulnerabilities could be exploited in real-world applications and the potential consequences for end-users and organizations.

Conclusion

The PROMPTFUZZ framework introduced in this paper represents an important step towards ensuring the robustness of LLMs against security threats like prompt injection attacks. By leveraging fuzzing techniques, the framework can systematically uncover vulnerabilities that may be missed by traditional testing methods.

The paper's findings highlight the critical need for effective testing tools and robust defenses to support the safe and reliable deployment of LLMs in real-world applications, particularly those with high-stakes consequences. Further research is needed to address the potential limitations of the PROMPTFUZZ framework and explore the broader implications of LLM vulnerabilities.

Overall, this work contributes to the growing body of research aimed at improving the security and reliability of large language models, which are becoming increasingly integral to a wide range of technological applications and services.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧪

PROMPTFUZZ: Harnessing Fuzzing Techniques for Robust Testing of Prompt Injection in LLMs

Jiahao Yu, Yangguang Shao, Hanwen Miao, Junzheng Shi, Xinyu Xing

Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread use in various applications due to their powerful capability to generate human-like text. However, prompt injection attacks, which involve overwriting a model's original instructions with malicious prompts to manipulate the generated text, have raised significant concerns about the security and reliability of LLMs. Ensuring that LLMs are robust against such attacks is crucial for their deployment in real-world applications, particularly in critical tasks. In this paper, we propose PROMPTFUZZ, a novel testing framework that leverages fuzzing techniques to systematically assess the robustness of LLMs against prompt injection attacks. Inspired by software fuzzing, PROMPTFUZZ selects promising seed prompts and generates a diverse set of prompt injections to evaluate the target LLM's resilience. PROMPTFUZZ operates in two stages: the prepare phase, which involves selecting promising initial seeds and collecting few-shot examples, and the focus phase, which uses the collected examples to generate diverse, high-quality prompt injections. Using PROMPTFUZZ, we can uncover more vulnerabilities in LLMs, even those with strong defense prompts. By deploying the generated attack prompts from PROMPTFUZZ in a real-world competition, we achieved the 7th ranking out of over 4000 participants (top 0.14%) within 2 hours. Additionally, we construct a dataset to fine-tune LLMs for enhanced robustness against prompt injection attacks. While the fine-tuned model shows improved robustness, PROMPTFUZZ continues to identify vulnerabilities, highlighting the importance of robust testing for LLMs. Our work emphasizes the critical need for effective testing tools and provides a practical framework for evaluating and improving the robustness of LLMs against prompt injection attacks.

9/24/2024

💬

PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Prompts

Kaijie Zhu, Jindong Wang, Jiaheng Zhou, Zichen Wang, Hao Chen, Yidong Wang, Linyi Yang, Wei Ye, Yue Zhang, Neil Zhenqiang Gong, Xing Xie

The increasing reliance on Large Language Models (LLMs) across academia and industry necessitates a comprehensive understanding of their robustness to prompts. In response to this vital need, we introduce PromptRobust, a robustness benchmark designed to measure LLMs' resilience to adversarial prompts. This study uses a plethora of adversarial textual attacks targeting prompts across multiple levels: character, word, sentence, and semantic. The adversarial prompts, crafted to mimic plausible user errors like typos or synonyms, aim to evaluate how slight deviations can affect LLM outcomes while maintaining semantic integrity. These prompts are then employed in diverse tasks including sentiment analysis, natural language inference, reading comprehension, machine translation, and math problem-solving. Our study generates 4,788 adversarial prompts, meticulously evaluated over 8 tasks and 13 datasets. Our findings demonstrate that contemporary LLMs are not robust to adversarial prompts. Furthermore, we present a comprehensive analysis to understand the mystery behind prompt robustness and its transferability. We then offer insightful robustness analysis and pragmatic recommendations for prompt composition, beneficial to both researchers and everyday users.

7/17/2024

✨

Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses

Yupei Liu, Yuqi Jia, Runpeng Geng, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang Gong

A prompt injection attack aims to inject malicious instruction/data into the input of an LLM-Integrated Application such that it produces results as an attacker desires. Existing works are limited to case studies. As a result, the literature lacks a systematic understanding of prompt injection attacks and their defenses. We aim to bridge the gap in this work. In particular, we propose a framework to formalize prompt injection attacks. Existing attacks are special cases in our framework. Moreover, based on our framework, we design a new attack by combining existing ones. Using our framework, we conduct a systematic evaluation on 5 prompt injection attacks and 10 defenses with 10 LLMs and 7 tasks. Our work provides a common benchmark for quantitatively evaluating future prompt injection attacks and defenses. To facilitate research on this topic, we make our platform public at https://github.com/liu00222/Open-Prompt-Injection.

6/4/2024

GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts

Jiahao Yu, Xingwei Lin, Zheng Yu, Xinyu Xing

Large language models (LLMs) have recently experienced tremendous popularity and are widely used from casual conversations to AI-driven programming. However, despite their considerable success, LLMs are not entirely reliable and can give detailed guidance on how to conduct harmful or illegal activities. While safety measures can reduce the risk of such outputs, adversarial jailbreak attacks can still exploit LLMs to produce harmful content. These jailbreak templates are typically manually crafted, making large-scale testing challenging. In this paper, we introduce GPTFuzz, a novel black-box jailbreak fuzzing framework inspired by the AFL fuzzing framework. Instead of manual engineering, GPTFuzz automates the generation of jailbreak templates for red-teaming LLMs. At its core, GPTFuzz starts with human-written templates as initial seeds, then mutates them to produce new templates. We detail three key components of GPTFuzz: a seed selection strategy for balancing efficiency and variability, mutate operators for creating semantically equivalent or similar sentences, and a judgment model to assess the success of a jailbreak attack. We evaluate GPTFuzz against various commercial and open-source LLMs, including ChatGPT, LLaMa-2, and Vicuna, under diverse attack scenarios. Our results indicate that GPTFuzz consistently produces jailbreak templates with a high success rate, surpassing human-crafted templates. Remarkably, GPTFuzz achieves over 90% attack success rates against ChatGPT and Llama-2 models, even with suboptimal initial seed templates. We anticipate that GPTFuzz will be instrumental for researchers and practitioners in examining LLM robustness and will encourage further exploration into enhancing LLM safety.

6/28/2024