PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Prompts

Overview

• This paper introduces PromptRobust, a robustness benchmark designed to measure the resilience of Large Language Models (LLMs) to adversarial prompts.
• The study uses a variety of adversarial textual attacks targeting prompts at different levels: character, word, sentence, and semantic.
• The adversarial prompts are designed to mimic plausible user errors like typos or synonyms and evaluate how slight deviations can affect LLM outcomes while maintaining semantic integrity.
• The prompts are tested on diverse tasks including sentiment analysis, natural language inference, reading comprehension, machine translation, and math problem-solving.
• The findings demonstrate that contemporary LLMs are not robust to adversarial prompts, and the paper presents a comprehensive analysis to understand the mystery behind prompt robustness and its transferability.
• The paper offers insightful robustness analysis and pragmatic recommendations for prompt composition, beneficial to both researchers and everyday users.

Plain English Explanation

Large Language Models (LLMs) are a type of artificial intelligence that can understand and generate human-like text. They are being used increasingly across many industries and fields, such as academia and industry.

However, the researchers behind this paper found that these LLMs are not very resilient to small changes in the prompts (the instructions or questions) given to them. Imagine you're asking a very smart assistant a question, but you accidentally misspell a word or use a slightly different synonym. The researchers found that these tiny changes can significantly affect the model's response, even if the overall meaning of the prompt is still clear.

To test this, the researchers created a benchmark called PromptRobust. They generated thousands of "adversarial prompts" - prompts that had been deliberately altered in small ways, like adding a typo or switching a word for a similar one. They then used these prompts to test the LLMs on a variety of tasks, like analyzing sentiment, answering questions, and solving math problems.

The results showed that the LLMs struggled with these adversarial prompts, even when the changes were minor and the overall meaning was still clear. This suggests that LLMs may not be as robust or reliable as we'd like, especially in real-world situations where users might not always type perfect prompts.

The researchers provide some insights into why LLMs have this weakness and offer recommendations for how to make them more resilient to small prompt variations. This is important for researchers, developers, and everyday users who rely on these powerful language models.

Technical Explanation

The PromptRobust benchmark introduced in this paper is designed to measure the resilience of Large Language Models (LLMs) to adversarial prompts. The researchers created a diverse set of 4,788 adversarial prompts that target prompts at different levels: character, word, sentence, and semantic.

These adversarial prompts are crafted to mimic plausible user errors, such as typos or using synonyms, in order to evaluate how slight deviations can affect LLM outcomes while maintaining semantic integrity. The prompts are then used to test LLM performance on a variety of tasks, including sentiment analysis, natural language inference, reading comprehension, machine translation, and math problem-solving.

The study finds that contemporary LLMs are not robust to these adversarial prompts, even when the changes are minor. The researchers present a comprehensive analysis to understand the underlying reasons for this lack of prompt robustness and its transferability across different tasks and models.

The paper also offers insightful robustness analysis and pragmatic recommendations for prompt composition. These insights can be beneficial for both researchers working to improve LLM robustness, as well as everyday users who rely on these models in their daily lives.

Critical Analysis

The PromptRobust study provides valuable insights into the limitations of current LLMs, particularly their vulnerability to small changes in prompts. The researchers have done a commendable job in designing a robust benchmark and thoroughly evaluating LLM performance across a diverse range of tasks and datasets.

One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses solely on textual adversarial attacks, while LLMs may also be susceptible to other types of perturbations, such as those involving code or numerical data. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the underlying reasons for the lack of prompt robustness in detail, and further research may be needed to fully understand the mechanisms behind this phenomenon.

The researchers' recommendations for prompt composition are a useful starting point, but it would be interesting to see if other techniques, such as adversarial training or prompt engineering, could be employed to improve LLM robustness to adversarial prompts. Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the robustness and reliability of Large Language Models.

Conclusion

The PromptRobust study highlights a critical issue with the current state of Large Language Models (LLMs) - their lack of resilience to seemingly minor changes in the prompts they receive. The researchers have developed a comprehensive benchmark to measure this prompt robustness, and their findings demonstrate that contemporary LLMs struggle to maintain performance when faced with adversarial prompts.

This research has important implications for both researchers and everyday users of LLMs. It underscores the need for further work to improve the robustness and reliability of these powerful language models, which are being increasingly relied upon across a wide range of applications. The insights and recommendations provided in this paper offer a valuable starting point for addressing this challenge and paving the way for more robust and trustworthy LLMs in the future.