Protecting Copyrighted Material with Unique Identifiers in Large Language Model Training
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- A new tool called "Ghost Sentence" helps everyday users copyright data from large language models (LLMs).
- It allows users to create unique text snippets that can be used to identify and protect their original content.
- The tool addresses the challenge of LLMs potentially memorizing and reproducing users' private information.
Plain English Explanation
Ghost Sentence is a new tool that enables regular people to protect their own text and data from being used by large language models (LLMs) without permission. LLMs are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, but they also have the potential to memorize and reproduce users' private information.
The Ghost Sentence tool allows users to create unique text snippets that can act as digital watermarks or copyright tags. These snippets can be embedded in the user's own writing or shared content. If the user's text later appears in the output of an LLM, the Ghost Sentence markers can help prove the original ownership and potentially prevent unauthorized use.
This addresses an important issue as LLMs become more widespread. Everyday users may want to protect their personal writings, ideas, or other original content from being copied or misappropriated by these powerful AI systems. The Ghost Sentence tool provides a simple solution for regular people to assert their intellectual property rights.
Technical Explanation
The Ghost Sentence paper introduces a new technique for users to create unique text snippets that can be used to identify and protect their original content from potential misuse by large language models (LLMs).
The key idea is to leverage the "memorization" behavior of LLMs, where the models can sometimes reproduce verbatim text that was used during their training. The authors develop an algorithm that generates short, unique sentences (called "ghost sentences") that are designed to be memorized by LLMs. These ghost sentences can then be embedded into the user's own text or shared content.
If the user's text containing the ghost sentences later appears in the output of an LLM, the presence of the ghost sentences can serve as a digital watermark or copyright tag. This allows the user to assert ownership and potentially prevent unauthorized use of their original material.
The authors evaluate the effectiveness of the Ghost Sentence approach through experiments on various LLM architectures. They demonstrate that the ghost sentences are reliably memorized by the models and can be used to accurately detect the reuse of user-provided content.
Critical Analysis
The Ghost Sentence paper addresses an important challenge faced by everyday users as large language models become more widespread and powerful. The ability to protect personal writings, ideas, and other original content from potential misuse by LLMs is a significant concern that this tool aims to address.
One potential limitation is that the effectiveness of the Ghost Sentence approach may depend on the specific LLM architecture and training process. The authors tested their technique on a few popular models, but it's possible that future LLMs could develop ways to circumvent or detect the ghost sentences. Ongoing research and adaptation of the approach may be necessary to maintain its effectiveness over time.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential edge cases or adversarial attacks that could be used to bypass the Ghost Sentence protection. Further research into the robustness and security of the approach would be valuable.
Overall, the Ghost Sentence tool represents a promising step forward in empowering users to assert their intellectual property rights in the age of advanced language models. Continued innovation and collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and the public will be crucial to addressing the complex challenges at the intersection of AI, data ownership, and individual privacy.
Conclusion
The Ghost Sentence paper introduces a new tool that allows everyday users to create unique text snippets, or "ghost sentences," that can be used to identify and protect their original content from potential misuse by large language models (LLMs).
This addresses an important issue as LLMs become increasingly powerful and widespread. The ability to memorize and reproduce users' private information is a significant concern, and the Ghost Sentence tool provides a practical solution for individuals to assert their intellectual property rights.
While the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the approach, further research is needed to explore its long-term robustness and adaptability to evolving LLM architectures. Ongoing collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and the public will be crucial to ensuring that the benefits of advanced language models are balanced with the need to protect individual privacy and creative rights.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Protecting Copyrighted Material with Unique Identifiers in Large Language Model Training
Shuai Zhao, Linchao Zhu, Ruijie Quan, Yi Yang
A major public concern regarding the training of large language models (LLMs) is whether they abusing copyrighted online text. Previous membership inference methods may be misled by similar examples in vast amounts of training data. Additionally, these methods are often too complex for general users to understand and use, making them centralized, lacking transparency, and trustworthiness. To address these issues, we propose an alternative textit{insert-and-detection} methodology, advocating that web users and content platforms employ textbf{textit{unique identifiers}} for reliable and independent membership inference. Users and platforms can create their own identifiers, embed them in copyrighted text, and independently detect them in future LLMs. As an initial demonstration, we introduce textit{ghost sentences}, a primitive form of unique identifiers, consisting primarily of passphrases made up of random words. By embedding one ghost sentences in a few copyrighted texts, users can detect its membership using a perplexity test and a textit{user-friendly} last-$k$ words test. The perplexity test is based on the fact that LLMs trained on natural language should exhibit high perplexity when encountering unnatural passphrases. As the repetition increases, users can leverage the verbatim memorization ability of LLMs to perform a last-$k$ words test by chatting with LLMs without writing any code. Both tests offer rigorous statistical guarantees for membership inference. For LLaMA-13B, a perplexity test on 30 ghost sentences with an average of 7 repetitions in 148K examples yields a 0.891 ROC AUC. For the last-$k$ words test with OpenLLaMA-3B, 11 out of 16 users, with an average of 24 examples each, successfully identify their data from 1.8M examples.
Read more8/13/2024
0
LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?
Pratyush Maini, Hengrui Jia, Nicolas Papernot, Adam Dziedzic
The proliferation of large language models (LLMs) in the real world has come with a rise in copyright cases against companies for training their models on unlicensed data from the internet. Recent works have presented methods to identify if individual text sequences were members of the model's training data, known as membership inference attacks (MIAs). We demonstrate that the apparent success of these MIAs is confounded by selecting non-members (text sequences not used for training) belonging to a different distribution from the members (e.g., temporally shifted recent Wikipedia articles compared with ones used to train the model). This distribution shift makes membership inference appear successful. However, most MIA methods perform no better than random guessing when discriminating between members and non-members from the same distribution (e.g., in this case, the same period of time). Even when MIAs work, we find that different MIAs succeed at inferring membership of samples from different distributions. Instead, we propose a new dataset inference method to accurately identify the datasets used to train large language models. This paradigm sits realistically in the modern-day copyright landscape, where authors claim that an LLM is trained over multiple documents (such as a book) written by them, rather than one particular paragraph. While dataset inference shares many of the challenges of membership inference, we solve it by selectively combining the MIAs that provide positive signal for a given distribution, and aggregating them to perform a statistical test on a given dataset. Our approach successfully distinguishes the train and test sets of different subsets of the Pile with statistically significant p-values < 0.1, without any false positives.
Read more6/11/2024
💬
0
Copyright Traps for Large Language Models
Matthieu Meeus, Igor Shilov, Manuel Faysse, Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye
Questions of fair use of copyright-protected content to train Large Language Models (LLMs) are being actively debated. Document-level inference has been proposed as a new task: inferring from black-box access to the trained model whether a piece of content has been seen during training. SOTA methods however rely on naturally occurring memorization of (part of) the content. While very effective against models that memorize significantly, we hypothesize--and later confirm--that they will not work against models that do not naturally memorize, e.g. medium-size 1B models. We here propose to use copyright traps, the inclusion of fictitious entries in original content, to detect the use of copyrighted materials in LLMs with a focus on models where memorization does not naturally occur. We carefully design a randomized controlled experimental setup, inserting traps into original content (books) and train a 1.3B LLM from scratch. We first validate that the use of content in our target model would be undetectable using existing methods. We then show, contrary to intuition, that even medium-length trap sentences repeated a significant number of times (100) are not detectable using existing methods. However, we show that longer sequences repeated a large number of times can be reliably detected (AUC=0.75) and used as copyright traps. Beyond copyright applications, our findings contribute to the study of LLM memorization: the randomized controlled setup enables us to draw causal relationships between memorization and certain sequence properties such as repetition in model training data and perplexity.
Read more6/6/2024
🧠
0
LLMs and Memorization: On Quality and Specificity of Copyright Compliance
Felix B Mueller, Rebekka Gorge, Anna K Bernzen, Janna C Pirk, Maximilian Poretschkin
Memorization in large language models (LLMs) is a growing concern. LLMs have been shown to easily reproduce parts of their training data, including copyrighted work. This is an important problem to solve, as it may violate existing copyright laws as well as the European AI Act. In this work, we propose a systematic analysis to quantify the extent of potential copyright infringements in LLMs using European law as an example. Unlike previous work, we evaluate instruction-finetuned models in a realistic end-user scenario. Our analysis builds on a proposed threshold of 160 characters, which we borrow from the German Copyright Service Provider Act and a fuzzy text matching algorithm to identify potentially copyright-infringing textual reproductions. The specificity of countermeasures against copyright infringement is analyzed by comparing model behavior on copyrighted and public domain data. We investigate what behaviors models show instead of producing protected text (such as refusal or hallucination) and provide a first legal assessment of these behaviors. We find that there are huge differences in copyright compliance, specificity, and appropriate refusal among popular LLMs. Alpaca, GPT 4, GPT 3.5, and Luminous perform best in our comparison, with OpenGPT-X, Alpaca, and Luminous producing a particularly low absolute number of potential copyright violations. Code will be published soon.
Read more7/1/2024