LLMs and Memorization: On Quality and Specificity of Copyright Compliance
0
🧠
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) can easily reproduce parts of their training data, including copyrighted work, which is an important problem to solve
- This paper proposes a systematic analysis to quantify the extent of potential copyright infringements in LLMs using European law as an example
- The analysis evaluates instruction-finetuned models in a realistic end-user scenario and uses a proposed threshold of 160 characters and a fuzzy text matching algorithm to identify potentially copyright-infringing textual reproductions
- The specificity of countermeasures against copyright infringement is analyzed by comparing model behavior on copyrighted and public domain data
- The paper investigates what behaviors models show instead of producing protected text and provides a first legal assessment of these behaviors
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. However, there is a growing concern that these models can easily reproduce parts of their training data, including text that is protected by copyright laws. This is a problem because it may violate existing copyright laws, as well as the European AI Act, which is a set of regulations for the use of AI in the European Union.
To address this issue, the researchers in this paper propose a systematic way to measure the extent of potential copyright infringement in LLMs. They focus on European law as an example, and they evaluate instruction-finetuned models (which are LLMs that have been further trained on specific tasks) in a realistic scenario where a user might interact with them.
The researchers use a threshold of 160 characters and a fuzzy text matching algorithm to identify potentially copyright-infringing text. They also compare how the models behave when presented with copyrighted versus public domain data, to see if the models can distinguish between the two and respond appropriately (e.g., by refusing to reproduce the copyrighted text).
The researchers find that there are significant differences in the copyright compliance, specificity, and appropriate refusal among popular LLMs. Some models, such as Alpaca, GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Luminous, perform better than others in terms of avoiding potential copyright violations.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a systematic analysis to quantify the extent of potential copyright infringements in large language models (LLMs) using European law as an example. Unlike previous work, the researchers evaluate instruction-finetuned models in a realistic end-user scenario.
The analysis builds on a proposed threshold of 160 characters, borrowed from the German Copyright Service Provider Act, and a fuzzy text matching algorithm to identify potentially copyright-infringing textual reproductions. The specificity of countermeasures against copyright infringement is analyzed by comparing model behavior on copyrighted and public domain data.
The researchers investigate what behaviors models show instead of producing protected text (such as refusal or hallucination) and provide a first legal assessment of these behaviors. They find that there are huge differences in copyright compliance, specificity, and appropriate refusal among popular LLMs, with Alpaca, GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Luminous performing best in their comparison.
The researchers also note that OpenGPT-X, Alpaca, and Luminous produce a particularly low absolute number of potential copyright violations.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and systematic analysis of the potential copyright infringement issues in large language models (LLMs), which is an important and timely topic. The researchers' use of a threshold of 160 characters and a fuzzy text matching algorithm to identify potentially copyright-infringing text seems reasonable, though the specific threshold and algorithm may be open to further discussion and refinement.
One limitation of the study is that it focuses on European law as an example, and the findings may not necessarily apply to other legal jurisdictions. Additionally, the researchers only evaluate instruction-finetuned models, and it would be interesting to see how the results might differ for other types of LLMs, such as those trained on a more diverse set of data sources.
The paper also does not delve deeply into the potential reasons for benchmark retrieval and automated citations in scientific sentences, which could provide valuable insights into the mechanisms behind the observed copyright infringement behaviors.
Overall, this paper represents an important step towards enhancing the legal compliance and regulation analysis of large language models, and the researchers' findings could have significant implications for the development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a systematic analysis of the potential copyright infringement issues in large language models (LLMs), using European law as an example. The researchers propose a method to identify potentially copyright-infringing textual reproductions and analyze the specificity of countermeasures against such infringement.
The study finds that there are significant differences in the copyright compliance, specificity, and appropriate refusal among popular LLMs, with some models (such as Alpaca, GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Luminous) performing better than others. The researchers' findings have important implications for the development and deployment of LLMs, as well as the ongoing efforts to enhance the legal compliance and regulation analysis of these AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
0
LLMs and Memorization: On Quality and Specificity of Copyright Compliance
Felix B Mueller, Rebekka Gorge, Anna K Bernzen, Janna C Pirk, Maximilian Poretschkin
Memorization in large language models (LLMs) is a growing concern. LLMs have been shown to easily reproduce parts of their training data, including copyrighted work. This is an important problem to solve, as it may violate existing copyright laws as well as the European AI Act. In this work, we propose a systematic analysis to quantify the extent of potential copyright infringements in LLMs using European law as an example. Unlike previous work, we evaluate instruction-finetuned models in a realistic end-user scenario. Our analysis builds on a proposed threshold of 160 characters, which we borrow from the German Copyright Service Provider Act and a fuzzy text matching algorithm to identify potentially copyright-infringing textual reproductions. The specificity of countermeasures against copyright infringement is analyzed by comparing model behavior on copyrighted and public domain data. We investigate what behaviors models show instead of producing protected text (such as refusal or hallucination) and provide a first legal assessment of these behaviors. We find that there are huge differences in copyright compliance, specificity, and appropriate refusal among popular LLMs. Alpaca, GPT 4, GPT 3.5, and Luminous perform best in our comparison, with OpenGPT-X, Alpaca, and Luminous producing a particularly low absolute number of potential copyright violations. Code will be published soon.
Read more7/1/2024
0
Measuring Copyright Risks of Large Language Model via Partial Information Probing
Weijie Zhao, Huajie Shao, Zhaozhuo Xu, Suzhen Duan, Denghui Zhang
Exploring the data sources used to train Large Language Models (LLMs) is a crucial direction in investigating potential copyright infringement by these models. While this approach can identify the possible use of copyrighted materials in training data, it does not directly measure infringing risks. Recent research has shifted towards testing whether LLMs can directly output copyrighted content. Addressing this direction, we investigate and assess LLMs' capacity to generate infringing content by providing them with partial information from copyrighted materials, and try to use iterative prompting to get LLMs to generate more infringing content. Specifically, we input a portion of a copyrighted text into LLMs, prompt them to complete it, and then analyze the overlap between the generated content and the original copyrighted material. Our findings demonstrate that LLMs can indeed generate content highly overlapping with copyrighted materials based on these partial inputs.
Read more9/24/2024
0
SHIELD: Evaluation and Defense Strategies for Copyright Compliance in LLM Text Generation
Xiaoze Liu, Ting Sun, Tianyang Xu, Feijie Wu, Cunxiang Wang, Xiaoqian Wang, Jing Gao
Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed machine learning but raised significant legal concerns due to their potential to produce text that infringes on copyrights, resulting in several high-profile lawsuits. The legal landscape is struggling to keep pace with these rapid advancements, with ongoing debates about whether generated text might plagiarize copyrighted materials. Current LLMs may infringe on copyrights or overly restrict non-copyrighted texts, leading to these challenges: (i) the need for a comprehensive evaluation benchmark to assess copyright compliance from multiple aspects; (ii) evaluating robustness against safeguard bypassing attacks; and (iii) developing effective defense targeted against the generation of copyrighted text. To tackle these challenges, we introduce a curated dataset to evaluate methods, test attack strategies, and propose lightweight, real-time defense to prevent the generation of copyrighted text, ensuring the safe and lawful use of LLMs. Our experiments demonstrate that current LLMs frequently output copyrighted text, and that jailbreaking attacks can significantly increase the volume of copyrighted output. Our proposed defense mechanism significantly reduces the volume of copyrighted text generated by LLMs by effectively refusing malicious requests. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/xz-liu/SHIELD
Read more8/22/2024
💬
0
Copyright Traps for Large Language Models
Matthieu Meeus, Igor Shilov, Manuel Faysse, Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye
Questions of fair use of copyright-protected content to train Large Language Models (LLMs) are being actively debated. Document-level inference has been proposed as a new task: inferring from black-box access to the trained model whether a piece of content has been seen during training. SOTA methods however rely on naturally occurring memorization of (part of) the content. While very effective against models that memorize significantly, we hypothesize--and later confirm--that they will not work against models that do not naturally memorize, e.g. medium-size 1B models. We here propose to use copyright traps, the inclusion of fictitious entries in original content, to detect the use of copyrighted materials in LLMs with a focus on models where memorization does not naturally occur. We carefully design a randomized controlled experimental setup, inserting traps into original content (books) and train a 1.3B LLM from scratch. We first validate that the use of content in our target model would be undetectable using existing methods. We then show, contrary to intuition, that even medium-length trap sentences repeated a significant number of times (100) are not detectable using existing methods. However, we show that longer sequences repeated a large number of times can be reliably detected (AUC=0.75) and used as copyright traps. Beyond copyright applications, our findings contribute to the study of LLM memorization: the randomized controlled setup enables us to draw causal relationships between memorization and certain sequence properties such as repetition in model training data and perplexity.
Read more6/6/2024