Putting Data at the Centre of Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Read original: arXiv:2409.12001 - Published 9/19/2024 by Claude Formanek, Louise Beyers, Callum Rhys Tilbury, Jonathan P. Shock, Arnu Pretorius
Total Score

0

Putting Data at the Centre of Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses the importance of data in offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) and the current state of datasets for this field.
  • It identifies key challenges and proposes potential solutions to improve the development and use of datasets for offline MARL research.
  • The paper emphasizes the need to put data at the center of offline MARL to drive meaningful progress in the field.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on the role of data in the field of offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). Offline MARL is a type of machine learning where agents learn to solve complex tasks without interacting with the real world, but instead using pre-collected data.

The authors argue that the quality and availability of datasets are crucial for making progress in offline MARL. They analyze the current state of datasets in this field and identify several key challenges, such as the lack of standardization, limited diversity, and the need for better annotation and curation.

To address these issues, the paper proposes potential solutions, such as the development of benchmark datasets, the creation of data collection frameworks, and the establishment of data-centric research practices. By putting data at the center of offline MARL research, the authors believe the field can make more meaningful and sustainable progress.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the importance of data in the field of offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). Offline MARL is a paradigm where agents learn to solve complex tasks without interacting with the real world, but instead using pre-collected data.

The authors argue that the quality and availability of datasets are crucial for making progress in offline MARL. They analyze the current state of datasets in this field and identify several key challenges, such as:

  1. Lack of Standardization: There is no consensus on the format, content, and quality standards for offline MARL datasets, which hinders comparisons and reproducibility.
  2. Limited Diversity: Existing datasets often lack diversity in terms of environments, agent behaviors, and task complexities, limiting the generalization of learned models.
  3. Insufficient Annotation and Curation: Many datasets lack detailed annotations and curation, making it difficult for researchers to understand the properties and limitations of the data.

To address these challenges, the paper proposes several potential solutions:

  1. Benchmark Datasets: The development of well-designed and curated benchmark datasets that can serve as a common testbed for offline MARL research.
  2. Data Collection Frameworks: The creation of standardized frameworks and tools for collecting, annotating, and sharing offline MARL datasets.
  3. Data-Centric Research Practices: The adoption of data-centric research practices, where dataset design and curation are given equal importance to algorithmic innovation.

By putting data at the center of offline MARL research, the authors believe the field can make more meaningful and sustainable progress, leading to more robust and reliable multi-agent systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises valid concerns about the current state of datasets in the offline MARL field and the need for more standardization, diversity, and curation. The proposed solutions, such as benchmark datasets and data collection frameworks, are well-reasoned and could potentially address these issues.

However, the paper does not delve into the practical challenges of implementing these solutions, such as the resources and coordination required to develop and maintain high-quality datasets. Additionally, the paper could have explored the potential biases and limitations that may be inherent in the data collection and curation processes, and how to mitigate these concerns.

Furthermore, the paper could have discussed the broader implications of a data-centric approach to offline MARL research, such as the potential impact on algorithm development, the role of domain knowledge, and the ethical considerations around data privacy and bias.

Conclusion

The paper makes a compelling case for putting data at the center of offline MARL research. By addressing the current challenges in dataset quality and availability, the field can make more meaningful and sustainable progress, leading to the development of more robust and reliable multi-agent systems.

The proposed solutions, such as benchmark datasets and data collection frameworks, offer a promising path forward. However, the practical implementation and potential limitations of these approaches require further exploration.

Overall, the paper underscores the critical importance of data in the field of offline MARL and provides a valuable framework for driving the development and use of high-quality datasets to advance the state of the art in this rapidly evolving field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Putting Data at the Centre of Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Putting Data at the Centre of Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Claude Formanek, Louise Beyers, Callum Rhys Tilbury, Jonathan P. Shock, Arnu Pretorius

Offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is an exciting direction of research that uses static datasets to find optimal control policies for multi-agent systems. Though the field is by definition data-driven, efforts have thus far neglected data in their drive to achieve state-of-the-art results. We first substantiate this claim by surveying the literature, showing how the majority of works generate their own datasets without consistent methodology and provide sparse information about the characteristics of these datasets. We then show why neglecting the nature of the data is problematic, through salient examples of how tightly algorithmic performance is coupled to the dataset used, necessitating a common foundation for experiments in the field. In response, we take a big step towards improving data usage and data awareness in offline MARL, with three key contributions: (1) a clear guideline for generating novel datasets; (2) a standardisation of over 80 existing datasets, hosted in a publicly available repository, using a consistent storage format and easy-to-use API; and (3) a suite of analysis tools that allow us to understand these datasets better, aiding further development.

Read more

9/19/2024

Coordination Failure in Cooperative Offline MARL
Total Score

0

Coordination Failure in Cooperative Offline MARL

Callum Rhys Tilbury, Claude Formanek, Louise Beyers, Jonathan P. Shock, Arnu Pretorius

Offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) leverages static datasets of experience to learn optimal multi-agent control. However, learning from static data presents several unique challenges to overcome. In this paper, we focus on coordination failure and investigate the role of joint actions in multi-agent policy gradients with offline data, focusing on a common setting we refer to as the 'Best Response Under Data' (BRUD) approach. By using two-player polynomial games as an analytical tool, we demonstrate a simple yet overlooked failure mode of BRUD-based algorithms, which can lead to catastrophic coordination failure in the offline setting. Building on these insights, we propose an approach to mitigate such failure, by prioritising samples from the dataset based on joint-action similarity during policy learning and demonstrate its effectiveness in detailed experiments. More generally, however, we argue that prioritised dataset sampling is a promising area for innovation in offline MARL that can be combined with other effective approaches such as critic and policy regularisation. Importantly, our work shows how insights drawn from simplified, tractable games can lead to useful, theoretically grounded insights that transfer to more complex contexts. A core dimension of offering is an interactive notebook, from which almost all of our results can be reproduced, in a browser.

Read more

7/2/2024

Dispelling the Mirage of Progress in Offline MARL through Standardised Baselines and Evaluation
Total Score

0

Dispelling the Mirage of Progress in Offline MARL through Standardised Baselines and Evaluation

Claude Formanek, Callum Rhys Tilbury, Louise Beyers, Jonathan Shock, Arnu Pretorius

Offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is an emerging field with great promise for real-world applications. Unfortunately, the current state of research in offline MARL is plagued by inconsistencies in baselines and evaluation protocols, which ultimately makes it difficult to accurately assess progress, trust newly proposed innovations, and allow researchers to easily build upon prior work. In this paper, we firstly identify significant shortcomings in existing methodologies for measuring the performance of novel algorithms through a representative study of published offline MARL work. Secondly, by directly comparing to this prior work, we demonstrate that simple, well-implemented baselines can achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) results across a wide range of tasks. Specifically, we show that on 35 out of 47 datasets used in prior work (almost 75% of cases), we match or surpass the performance of the current purported SOTA. Strikingly, our baselines often substantially outperform these more sophisticated algorithms. Finally, we correct for the shortcomings highlighted from this prior work by introducing a straightforward standardised methodology for evaluation and by providing our baseline implementations with statistically robust results across several scenarios, useful for comparisons in future work. Our proposal includes simple and sensible steps that are easy to adopt, which in combination with solid baselines and comparative results, could substantially improve the overall rigour of empirical science in offline MARL moving forward.

Read more

6/14/2024

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Data Coverage and Algorithmic Techniques
Total Score

0

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Data Coverage and Algorithmic Techniques

Natalia Zhang, Xinqi Wang, Qiwen Cui, Runlong Zhou, Sham M. Kakade, Simon S. Du

We initiate the study of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (MARLHF), exploring both theoretical foundations and empirical validations. We define the task as identifying Nash equilibrium from a preference-only offline dataset in general-sum games, a problem marked by the challenge of sparse feedback signals. Our theory establishes the upper complexity bounds for Nash Equilibrium in effective MARLHF, demonstrating that single-policy coverage is inadequate and highlighting the importance of unilateral dataset coverage. These theoretical insights are verified through comprehensive experiments. To enhance the practical performance, we further introduce two algorithmic techniques. (1) We propose a Mean Squared Error (MSE) regularization along the time axis to achieve a more uniform reward distribution and improve reward learning outcomes. (2) We utilize imitation learning to approximate the reference policy, ensuring stability and effectiveness in training. Our findings underscore the multifaceted approach required for MARLHF, paving the way for effective preference-based multi-agent systems.

Read more

9/5/2024