Dispelling the Mirage of Progress in Offline MARL through Standardised Baselines and Evaluation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper examines the methodological problems in the field of Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (Offline MARL), which involves training AI agents to cooperate and compete in complex environments using pre-collected data instead of live interaction.
• The authors argue that the field of Offline MARL is facing a "mirage of progress" due to issues with experimental design, evaluation, and reporting, making it difficult to assess true advancements.
Plain English Explanation
• Offline MARL is a type of machine learning where AI agents are trained to work together or against each other in complicated scenarios, but the training is done using previously collected data rather than live interactions.
• The researchers claim that the field of Offline MARL seems to be making progress, but the way experiments are designed, evaluated, and reported is causing problems that make it hard to tell if the field is truly advancing.
• They aim to expose these methodological issues and provide standardized baselines and evaluation methods to help the community assess Offline MARL algorithms more accurately.
Technical Explanation
• The paper identifies several key problems in Offline MARL research, including:
- Inconsistent and non-representative benchmarks
- Lack of standardized evaluation protocols
- Insufficient reporting of experimental details
- Overemphasis on final performance metrics over process understanding
• To address these issues, the authors propose:
- A set of standardized Offline MARL environments and baselines (link)
- Guidelines for comprehensive experimental reporting
- Novel evaluation metrics focused on learning dynamics and generalization
• The authors demonstrate the value of their approach through extensive experiments, showing that many recent Offline MARL algorithms fail to outperform simple baselines when evaluated properly.
Critical Analysis
• The paper raises valid concerns about the methodological rigor in the Offline MARL field, which are echoed in critiques of other areas of reinforcement learning research (link, link).
• While the proposed standardized benchmarks and evaluation protocols are a step in the right direction, their effectiveness will depend on broader adoption by the research community.
• The authors acknowledge that their work does not address all possible sources of bias, such as the influence of the data distribution in Offline MARL settings (link, link).
Conclusion
• This paper highlights the critical need for more rigorous experimental practices and reporting in the field of Offline MARL to ensure meaningful progress and avoid the "mirage of progress" that the authors describe.
• By establishing standardized benchmarks and evaluation methods, the authors aim to provide a framework for the community to more accurately assess the performance and generalization capabilities of Offline MARL algorithms.
• Implementing these recommendations could lead to more robust and reliable advances in Offline MARL, with important implications for real-world multi-agent systems in domains like robotics, logistics, and finance.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Dispelling the Mirage of Progress in Offline MARL through Standardised Baselines and Evaluation
Claude Formanek, Callum Rhys Tilbury, Louise Beyers, Jonathan Shock, Arnu Pretorius
Offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is an emerging field with great promise for real-world applications. Unfortunately, the current state of research in offline MARL is plagued by inconsistencies in baselines and evaluation protocols, which ultimately makes it difficult to accurately assess progress, trust newly proposed innovations, and allow researchers to easily build upon prior work. In this paper, we firstly identify significant shortcomings in existing methodologies for measuring the performance of novel algorithms through a representative study of published offline MARL work. Secondly, by directly comparing to this prior work, we demonstrate that simple, well-implemented baselines can achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) results across a wide range of tasks. Specifically, we show that on 35 out of 47 datasets used in prior work (almost 75% of cases), we match or surpass the performance of the current purported SOTA. Strikingly, our baselines often substantially outperform these more sophisticated algorithms. Finally, we correct for the shortcomings highlighted from this prior work by introducing a straightforward standardised methodology for evaluation and by providing our baseline implementations with statistically robust results across several scenarios, useful for comparisons in future work. Our proposal includes simple and sensible steps that are easy to adopt, which in combination with solid baselines and comparative results, could substantially improve the overall rigour of empirical science in offline MARL moving forward.
Read more6/14/2024
🏅
0
BenchMARL: Benchmarking Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Matteo Bettini, Amanda Prorok, Vincent Moens
The field of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) is currently facing a reproducibility crisis. While solutions for standardized reporting have been proposed to address the issue, we still lack a benchmarking tool that enables standardization and reproducibility, while leveraging cutting-edge Reinforcement Learning (RL) implementations. In this paper, we introduce BenchMARL, the first MARL training library created to enable standardized benchmarking across different algorithms, models, and environments. BenchMARL uses TorchRL as its backend, granting it high performance and maintained state-of-the-art implementations while addressing the broad community of MARL PyTorch users. Its design enables systematic configuration and reporting, thus allowing users to create and run complex benchmarks from simple one-line inputs. BenchMARL is open-sourced on GitHub: https://github.com/facebookresearch/BenchMARL
Read more7/8/2024
0
A Meta-Game Evaluation Framework for Deep Multiagent Reinforcement Learning
Zun Li, Michael P. Wellman
Evaluating deep multiagent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms is complicated by stochasticity in training and sensitivity of agent performance to the behavior of other agents. We propose a meta-game evaluation framework for deep MARL, by framing each MARL algorithm as a meta-strategy, and repeatedly sampling normal-form empirical games over combinations of meta-strategies resulting from different random seeds. Each empirical game captures both self-play and cross-play factors across seeds. These empirical games provide the basis for constructing a sampling distribution, using bootstrapping, over a variety of game analysis statistics. We use this approach to evaluate state-of-the-art deep MARL algorithms on a class of negotiation games. From statistics on individual payoffs, social welfare, and empirical best-response graphs, we uncover strategic relationships among self-play, population-based, model-free, and model-based MARL methods.We also investigate the effect of run-time search as a meta-strategy operator, and find via meta-game analysis that the search version of a meta-strategy generally leads to improved performance.
Read more5/2/2024
0
Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Data Coverage and Algorithmic Techniques
Natalia Zhang, Xinqi Wang, Qiwen Cui, Runlong Zhou, Sham M. Kakade, Simon S. Du
We initiate the study of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (MARLHF), exploring both theoretical foundations and empirical validations. We define the task as identifying Nash equilibrium from a preference-only offline dataset in general-sum games, a problem marked by the challenge of sparse feedback signals. Our theory establishes the upper complexity bounds for Nash Equilibrium in effective MARLHF, demonstrating that single-policy coverage is inadequate and highlighting the importance of unilateral dataset coverage. These theoretical insights are verified through comprehensive experiments. To enhance the practical performance, we further introduce two algorithmic techniques. (1) We propose a Mean Squared Error (MSE) regularization along the time axis to achieve a more uniform reward distribution and improve reward learning outcomes. (2) We utilize imitation learning to approximate the reference policy, ensuring stability and effectiveness in training. Our findings underscore the multifaceted approach required for MARLHF, paving the way for effective preference-based multi-agent systems.
Read more9/5/2024