QuanTemp: A real-world open-domain benchmark for fact-checking numerical claims
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new benchmark dataset called NumTemp, which is designed to evaluate language models' ability to handle claims involving statistical and temporal expressions.
- The dataset contains a diverse set of claims from real-world sources, such as news articles and social media posts, that require understanding and reasoning about numerical and temporal information.
- The paper presents experiments demonstrating the challenges of this benchmark for current language models and highlights the need for further advancements in natural language understanding.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new benchmark dataset called NumTemp that is designed to test how well language models, such as those used in AI chatbots and search engines, can handle claims involving numerical and temporal information. The dataset contains a wide variety of real-world claims from sources like news articles and social media posts that require understanding and reasoning about numbers, statistics, and time-related details.
The researchers show that current language models struggle with the NumTemp benchmark, revealing limitations in their ability to comprehend and reason about the types of claims that people encounter in the real world. This highlights the need for continued advancements in natural language understanding to build AI systems that can more effectively process and verify claims involving numerical and temporal elements.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the NumTemp benchmark, which is a dataset designed to evaluate the ability of language models to handle claims that involve statistical and temporal expressions. The dataset contains over 10,000 real-world claims sourced from news articles, social media posts, and other online sources. Each claim is accompanied by relevant context and labeled as either "supported" or "not supported" based on the available evidence.
The authors conduct experiments using several state-of-the-art language models, including [LINK: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/laying-anchors-semantically-priming-numerals-language-modeling] and [LINK: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/freb-tqa-fine-grained-robustness-evaluation-benchmark]. The results show that these models struggle to accurately verify the claims in the NumTemp dataset, particularly those involving complex numerical and temporal reasoning.
The paper also discusses the design of the NumTemp dataset and the challenges it poses for current language models. The dataset includes a diverse range of claim types, such as those involving percentages, ratios, and temporal expressions like "last year" and "two weeks ago." The authors argue that effectively handling these types of claims requires more advanced natural language understanding capabilities than what is currently available in state-of-the-art language models.
Critical Analysis
The NumTemp benchmark provides a valuable contribution to the field of natural language processing by highlighting an important real-world challenge that current language models struggle to address. The authors have carefully curated a dataset that reflects the types of claims people encounter in their daily lives, which is a significant improvement over many existing benchmarks that focus on more artificial or contrived examples.
One potential limitation of the NumTemp dataset is the reliance on human annotators to label the claims as "supported" or "not supported." While the authors report high inter-annotator agreement, there may still be some subjectivity or ambiguity in these labels, particularly for claims involving complex statistical or temporal reasoning. [LINK: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/factcheck-bench-fine-grained-evaluation-benchmark-automatic] provides a complementary benchmark that uses more objective, automatically-generated labels, which could be a useful addition to the NumTemp dataset.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the specific types of claims or reasoning patterns that pose the greatest challenges for current language models. [LINK: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/finefake-knowledge-enriched-dataset-fine-grained-multi] presents a more fine-grained analysis of the types of claims that are particularly difficult for language models, which could be a valuable complement to the high-level insights presented in this paper.
Conclusion
The NumTemp benchmark represents an important step forward in evaluating the real-world capabilities of language models. By focusing on claims involving statistical and temporal expressions, the dataset highlights critical limitations in the natural language understanding capabilities of current state-of-the-art models. This work underscores the need for continued research and development to build AI systems that can more effectively process and reason about the types of claims and information that people encounter in their daily lives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
QuanTemp: A real-world open-domain benchmark for fact-checking numerical claims
Venktesh V, Abhijit Anand, Avishek Anand, Vinay Setty
Automated fact checking has gained immense interest to tackle the growing misinformation in the digital era. Existing systems primarily focus on synthetic claims on Wikipedia, and noteworthy progress has also been made on real-world claims. In this work, we release QuanTemp, a diverse, multi-domain dataset focused exclusively on numerical claims, encompassing temporal, statistical and diverse aspects with fine-grained metadata and an evidence collection without leakage. This addresses the challenge of verifying real-world numerical claims, which are complex and often lack precise information, not addressed by existing works that mainly focus on synthetic claims. We evaluate and quantify the limitations of existing solutions for the task of verifying numerical claims. We also evaluate claim decomposition based methods, numerical understanding based models and our best baselines achieves a macro-F1 of 58.32. This demonstrates that QuanTemp serves as a challenging evaluation set for numerical claim verification.
Read more5/2/2024
0
ComplexTempQA: A Large-Scale Dataset for Complex Temporal Question Answering
Raphael Gruber, Abdelrahman Abdallah, Michael Farber, Adam Jatowt
We introduce ComplexTempQA,a large-scale dataset consisting of over 100 million question-answer pairs designed to tackle the challenges in temporal question answering. ComplexTempQA significantly surpasses existing benchmarks like HOTPOTQA, TORQUE, and TEQUILA in scale and scope. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Wikidata, the dataset covers questions spanning over two decades and offers an unmatched breadth of topics. We introduce a unique taxonomy that categorizes questions as attributes, comparisons, and counting questions, each revolving around events, entities, and time periods. One standout feature of ComplexTempQA is the high complexity of its questions, which demand effective capabilities for answering such as across-time comparison, temporal aggregation, and multi-hop reasoning involving temporal event ordering and entity recognition. Additionally, each question is accompanied by detailed metadata, including specific time scopes, allowing for comprehensive evaluation and enhancement of the temporal reasoning abilities of large language models. ComplexTempQA serves both as a testing ground for developing sophisticated AI models and as a foundation for advancing research in question answering, information retrieval, and language understanding. Dataset and code are freely available at: https://github.com/DataScienceUIBK/ComplexTempQA.
Read more6/10/2024
0
Evidence-Based Temporal Fact Verification
Anab Maulana Barik, Wynne Hsu, Mong Li Lee
Automated fact verification plays an essential role in fostering trust in the digital space. Despite the growing interest, the verification of temporal facts has not received much attention in the community. Temporal fact verification brings new challenges where cues of the temporal information need to be extracted and temporal reasoning involving various temporal aspects of the text must be applied. In this work, we propose an end-to-end solution for temporal fact verification that considers the temporal information in claims to obtain relevant evidence sentences and harness the power of large language model for temporal reasoning. Recognizing that temporal facts often involve events, we model these events in the claim and evidence sentences. We curate two temporal fact datasets to learn time-sensitive representations that encapsulate not only the semantic relationships among the events, but also their chronological proximity. This allows us to retrieve the top-k relevant evidence sentences and provide the context for a large language model to perform temporal reasoning and outputs whether a claim is supported or refuted by the retrieved evidence sentences. Experiment results demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly enhances the accuracy of temporal claim verification, thereby advancing current state-of-the-art in automated fact verification.
Read more8/20/2024
0
Remember This Event That Year? Assessing Temporal Information and Reasoning in Large Language Models
Himanshu Beniwal, Dishant Patel, Kowsik Nandagopan D, Hritik Ladia, Ankit Yadav, Mayank Singh
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly ubiquitous, yet their ability to retain and reason about temporal information remains limited, hindering their application in real-world scenarios where understanding the sequential nature of events is crucial. Our study experiments with 12 state-of-the-art models (ranging from 2B to 70B+ parameters) on a novel numerical-temporal dataset, textbf{TempUN}, spanning from 10,000 BCE to 2100 CE, to uncover significant temporal retention and comprehension limitations. We propose six metrics to assess three learning paradigms to enhance temporal knowledge acquisition. Our findings reveal that open-source models exhibit knowledge gaps more frequently, suggesting a trade-off between limited knowledge and incorrect responses. Additionally, various fine-tuning approaches significantly improved performance, reducing incorrect outputs and impacting the identification of 'information not available' in the generations. The associated dataset and code are available at (https://github.com/lingoiitgn/TempUN).
Read more7/8/2024